In the road transport network, intersections are among the most critical locations leading to a risk of death and serious injury. The traditional methods to assess the safety of intersections are based on statistical analyses that require crash data. However, such data may be under-reported and omit important crash-related factors. The conventional approaches, therefore, are not easily applied to making comparisons of intersection designs under different road classifications. This study developed a risk-based approach that incorporates video-based traffic conflict analysis to investigate vehicle conflicts under mixed traffic conditions including motorcycles and cars in Thailand. The study applied such conflict data to assess the risk of intersections in terms of time-to-collision and conflict speed. Five functional classes of intersections were investigated, including local-road/local-road, local-road/collector, collector/arterial, collector/collector, and arterial/arterial intersections. The results showed that intersection classes, characteristics, and control affect the behavior of motorists and the safety of intersections. The results found that the low-order intersections with stop/no control are high risks due to the short time-to-collision of motorcycle-related conflicts. They generate frequent conflicts with low chance of injury. The high-order intersections with signal control are high risks due to high conflicting speeds of motorcycle–car conflicts. They generate few conflicts but at a high chance of injury. The study presents the applicability of video-based traffic conflict analysis for systematically estimating the crash risk of intersections. The risk-based approach can be deemed as a supplement indicator in addition to limited crash data to evaluate the safety of intersections. However, future research is needed to explore the potential of other road infrastructure under different circumstances.

Globally, road traffic collisions cause over a million deaths annually, with pedestrians accounting for 23%. In developing countries, most pedestrian deaths occur on urban arterial roads, particularly at midblock crossings. This study analyzes the factors influencing driver yielding behavior at midblock crosswalks on urban arterial roads in Thailand. This study analyzed the factors influencing driver yielding behavior at the midblock crosswalk before and after the upgrade from a zebra crossing (C1) to a smart pedestrian crossing (C2), which is a smart traffic signal detecting and controlling pedestrians and vehicles entering the crosswalk. Video-based observations were used to assess driver yielding behavior, with multinomial logistic regression applied to develop driver yielding behavior models. The results revealed that the chances of a driver yielding at C2 were higher than at C1, and the yielding rate increased by 74%. The models indicate that the number and width of traffic lanes, width and length of crosswalks, vulnerable group, number of pedestrians, pedestrian crossing time, number of vehicles, vehicle speed, headway, post-encroachment time between a vehicle and pedestrian, and roadside parking are the significant factors influencing yielding behavior. These findings propose measures to set proper crosswalk improvements (e.g., curb extensions), speed reduction measures, enforcement (e.g., parking restrictions), public awareness campaigns, and education initiatives.

Globally, road traffic collisions cause over a million deaths annually, with pedestrians accounting for nearly one-quarter (23%) of these fatalities. This casualty proportion highlights the critical importance of adhering to traffic regulations. This study analyzes the factors influencing driver yielding behavior at midblock crosswalk improvements, comparing (1) a typical zebra crossing (C1) and (2) an intelligent signalized crosswalk (C2). The study used video-based observational data to investigate driver behaviors and factors influencing driver behaviors. The study applied multinomial logistic regression to formulate yielding behavior models. The results indicate that the number of traffic lanes, width of the traffic lanes, width and length of the crosswalk, vulnerable group, the number of pedestrian crossings, pedestrian crossing time, the number of vehicles approaching a crosswalk, speed of vehicle, headway, the post-encroachment time (PET) between vehicles and pedestrian, and roadside parking are the significant factors influence yielding behavior. These findings provide a better understanding of the factors influencing driver yielding behavior and propose measures to set proper physical improvements (e.g., curb extensions, raised pedestrian platforms, and pedestrian fencing), enforcement (e.g., parking restriction, speed violation detection), public awareness campaigns, and education initiatives.

While multilane roundabouts follow geometric design standards, they often overlook motorcycle-dominated traffic behavior. This study evaluates lane-reduction strategies to create safer and more inclusive urban corridors in mixed-traffic conditions, focusing on a case study in Southern Thailand. High-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) trajectory data were analyzed using the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD), Cell Transmission Model (CTM), and Time-To-Collision (TTC) frameworks under three configurations: full lane availability, partial inner-lane closure, and full inner-lane closure. Results indicate progressive deterioration in performance under restricted-lane conditions. Under full closure, total flow decreased by 31%, and average travel time increased by 43%. The MFD curve shifted toward higher critical densities, indicating earlier congestion onset, while CTM results revealed longer discharge times, queue spillback, and increased merging friction. Conversely, safety outcomes (TTC) improved significantly: extreme rear-end conflicts were reduced by 48%, and severe lane-change conflicts were nearly eliminated (99%). Behavioral evidence suggests that full closure constrains motorcycles to a single circulating path, reducing erratic filtering and promoting more stable interactions. Overall, this study identifies a systemic trade-off between safety and efficiency, highlighting how geometric interventions catalyze behavioral adaptation. The findings highlight how geometric constraints shape collective behavior in motorcycle-dominated roundabouts and demonstrate the value of an integrated UAV-based framework as a vital tool for inclusive urban management, providing the granular data needed to balance safety and mobility in complex traffic landscapes.