Kathleen A Martin Ginis

Prof. Dr. Kathleen A Martin Ginis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
HPHidde P van der Ploeg
Hidde P van der Ploeg
CFCharlie Foster
Charlie Foster
BLByron Lai
Byron Lai
CMChristopher B McBride
Christopher B McBride
GHGregory W Heath
Gregory W Heath

1 September 2013 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAmy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
LPLara A. Pilutti
Lara A. Pilutti
AHAudrey L. Hicks
Audrey L. Hicks
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
AFAlyssa M. Fenuta
Alyssa M. Fenuta
RMRobert W. Motl
Robert W. Motl

22 January 2019 in Journal of Business and Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSilvia Bonaccio
Silvia Bonaccio
CCCatherine E. Connelly
Catherine E. Connelly
IGIan R. Gellatly
Ian R. Gellatly
AJArif Jetha
Arif Jetha
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
Despite legislation on diversity in the workplace, people with disabilities still do not experience the same access to work opportunities as do their counterparts without disabilities. Many employers have been shown to harbor sincere yet ill-founded views about the work-related abilities of people with disabilities; these negative views are often a result of interrelated concerns that permeate the entire employment cycle. In this paper, we provide evidence-based responses to 11 specific concerns that employers have about people with disabilities, from pre-employment and entry experiences to the final dissolution of the employment relationship. At each stage of the employment cycle, we summarize and evaluate the relevant empirical evidence and provide recommendations for organizations committed to creating more effective, equitable, and inclusive workplaces for all individuals. We also suggest avenues for future research.

18 December 2002 in Spinal Cord
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHA L Hicks
A L Hicks
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
DDD S Ditor
D S Ditor
ALA E Latimer
A E Latimer
CCC Craven
C Craven
NMN McCartney
N McCartney

29 June 2016 in Health Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
JMJasmin K. Ma
Jasmin K. Ma
ALAmy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
JRJames H. Rimmer
James H. Rimmer
Dozens of published papers cite factors related to leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) participation among people with physical disabilities. Unfortunately, there has been little effort to synthesise this literature in a manner that is accessible and useful to the sectors (e.g., health care, recreation) responsible for LTPA promotion in disability populations. In this systematic review, over 200 factors were extracted from 22 review articles addressing barriers and facilitators to LTPA in children and adults with physical disabilities. Factors were grouped according to common themes, classified into five levels of a social ecological model, and coded according to whether they could be affected by the health-care and/or recreation sectors. Findings are discussed with regard to key factors to target in LTPA-enhancing interventions, relevant theories and models in which to frame interventions, the levels at which the interventions can be implemented, and intervention priorities. The synthesis provides a blueprint and a catalyst for researchers and practitioners to shift focus from conducting studies that merely describe LTPA barriers and facilitators, to developing and delivering strategies to increase LTPA among persons with physical disabilities.

25 October 2017 in Spinal Cord
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKathleen A Martin Ginis
Kathleen A Martin Ginis
JSJan W. van der Scheer
Jan W. van der Scheer
ALAmy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
ABAndy Barrow
Andy Barrow
CBChris Bourne
Chris Bourne
VVicky Tolfrey
Vicky Tolfrey
To describe the process and outcomes of using a new evidence base to develop scientific guidelines that specify the type and minimum dose of exercise necessary to improve fitness and cardiometabolic health in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI). International. Using Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II reporting criteria, steps included (a) determining the guidelines’ scope; (b) conducting a systematic review of relevant literature; (c) holding three consensus panel meetings (European, Canadian and International) to formulate the guidelines; (d) obtaining stakeholder feedback; and (e) process evaluation by an AGREE II consultant. Stakeholders were actively involved in steps (c) and (d). For cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength benefits, adults with a SCI should engage in at least 20 min of moderate to vigorous intensity aerobic exercise 2 times per week AND 3 sets of strength exercises for each major functioning muscle group, at a moderate to vigorous intensity, 2 times per week (strong recommendation). For cardiometabolic health benefits, adults with a SCI are suggested to engage in at least 30 min of moderate to vigorous intensity aerobic exercise 3 times per week (conditional recommendation). Through a systematic, rigorous, and participatory process involving international scientists and stakeholders, a new exercise guideline was formulated for cardiometabolic health benefits. A previously published SCI guideline was endorsed for achieving fitness benefits. These guidelines represent an important step toward international harmonization of exercise guidelines for adults with SCI, and a foundation for developing exercise policies and programs for people with SCI around the world.