PD-L1 expression on tumour cells can guide the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune modulators to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression both within and between tumour sites is a well-documented phenomenon that compromises its predictive power. Our aim was to better characterise the pattern and extent of PD-L1 heterogeneity with a view to optimising tumour sampling and improve its accuracy as a biomarker. Expression of PD-L1 was assessed by immunochemistry using the SP263 clone in 107 resected primary NSCLCs and their nodal metastases. Intra-tumoural heterogeneity, defined as 'small-scale' (mm²), 'medium-scale' (cm²) and 'large-scale' (between tumour blocks), was assessed by digital imaging using a novel 'squares method'. Inter-tumoural heterogeneity between the primary tumours and their nodal metastases and between N1 and N2 nodal stages was also assessed. The majority of tumours demonstrated intra-tumoural heterogeneity (small-scale 78%, medium-scale 50%, large-scale 46%). Inter-tumoural heterogeneity between the primary and nodal metastases was present in 53% of cases and, in 17%, between N1 and N2 disease. These differences were occasionally sufficient to lead to discrepancy across the ≥1%, ≥25% and ≥50% cut-offs used to guide therapy. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression is common, variable in scale and extent, and carries significant implications for its accuracy as a predictive biomarker. Extensive sampling reduces, but cannot eliminate, this inaccuracy.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue is limited by epitope masking, posttranslational modification and immunoreactivity loss that occurs in stored tissue by poorly characterized mechanisms. Conformational epitopes recognized by many programmed-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) IHC assays are particularly susceptible to degradation and provide an ideal model for understanding signal loss in stored FFPE tissue. Here we assessed 1206 tissue sections to evaluate environmental factors impacting immunoreactivity loss. PD-L1 IHC using four antibodies (22C3, 28-8, E1L3N, and SP142), raised against intracellular and extracellular epitopes, was assessed in stored FFPE tissue alongside quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). Global proteome analyses were used to assess proteome-wide oxidation across an inventory of 3041 protein groups (24,737 distinct peptides). PD-L1 quantitation correlated well with IHC expression on unaged sections (R² = 0.744; P < 0.001), with MS demonstrating no loss of PD-L1 protein, even in sections with significant signal loss by IHC impacting diagnostic category. Clones 22C3 and 28-8 were most susceptible to signal loss, with E1L3N demonstrating the most robust signal (56%, 58%, and 33% reduction respectively; p < 0.05). Increased humidity and temperature resulted in significant acceleration of immunoreactivity loss, which was mitigated by storage with desiccant. MS demonstrated only modest oxidation of 274 methionine-containing peptides and aligned with IHC results suggesting peptide oxidation is not a major factor. These data imply immunoreactivity loss driven by humidity and temperature results in structural distortion of epitopes rendering them unsuitable for antibody binding following epitope retrieval. Limitations of IHC biomarker analysis from stored tissue sections may be mitigated by cost-effective use of desiccant when appropriate. In some scenarios, complementary MS is a preferred approach for retrospective analyses of archival FFPE tissue collections.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumour cells is the only predictive biomarker of response to immuno-modulatory therapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accuracy of this biomarker is hampered by its challenging interpretation. Here we explore if the use of machine-learning derived image analysis tools can improve interpathologist concordance of assessing PD-L1 expression in NSCLC. Five pathologists who routinely score PD-L1 at a major regional referral hospital for thoracic surgery participated. 13 NSCLC small diagnostic biopsies were stained for PD-L1 (SP263 clone) and digitally scanned. Each pathologist independently scored each case with and without the Roche uPath PD-L1 (SP263) image analysis NSCLC algorithm with a wash-out interim period of 6 weeks. A consistent improvement in interpathologist concordance was seen when using the image analysis tool compared with scoring without: (Fleiss’ kappa 0.886 vs 0.613 (p<0.0001) and intraclass coefficient correlation 0.954 vs 0.837 (p<0.001)). Five cases (38%) were classified into clinically relevant different categories (negative/weak/strong) by multiple pathologists when not using the image analysis algorithm, whereas only two cases (15%) were classified differently when using the image analysis algorithm. The use of the image analysis algorithm improved the concordance of assessing PD-L1 expression between pathologists. Critically, there was a marked improvement in the placement of cases into more consistent clinical groupings. This small study is evidence that the use of image analysis tools may improve consistency in assessing tumours for PD-L1 expression and may therefore result in more consistent prediction to targeted treatment options.

PD‐L1 expression for the prediction of response to immune‐checkpoint blockade remains the most broadly utilised clinically validated biomarker in a range of tumour types. In this study, we aimed to assess, in a prospectively collected matched cohort, the impact of sampling technique and both formalin and alcohol fixation on PD‐L1 expression and heterogeneity in non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Patients undergoing surgical resection for NSCLC were consented. Surgical specimens were received directly from theatre and sampled fresh to produce two sets of core biopsies, two fine‐needle aspirates (FNAs) and two whole‐block tissue sections from each specimen. A matched biopsy, FNA, and whole‐block were placed into formalin or an alcohol‐based fixative (Cytolyt™) prior to PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry assessment. A total of 114 specimens from 57 patients were included. All whole‐block cases (100%), 92% of core biopsies, and 88% of FNAs were adequate for PD‐L1 expression analysis. Fixation had no significant impact on adequacy, but cytology specimens fixed in alcohol showed a significant reduction in PD‐L1 expression, with 25% of cases placed into different clinically relevant categories of PD‐L1 expression. PD‐L1 expression by immunochemistry is an exemplar of the challenges of utilising a heterogeneously expressed protein‐based predictive biomarker. Regardless of sampling technique, a good quality biopsy or FNA is likely to give a statistically representative PD‐L1 expression, although expression ranges close to clinically relevant cut‐offs of 1% and 50% remain a source of potential discordance.