Clinical reasoning is fundamental to all forms of professional health practice, however it is also difficult to teach and learn because it is complex, tacit, and effectively invisible for students. In this paper we present an approach for teaching clinical reasoning based on making expert thinking visible and accessible to students.

Background: Clinical education is a key component to learning in the health professions. Aims: This qualitative study investigated how physiotherapy students and clinical educators perceived their respective roles in learning and teaching clinical skills during students’ first clinical placements. Methods: Separate physiotherapy student and educator focus groups were conducted in two major teaching hospitals in Melbourne, Australia during students’ first clinical placements. Results: The key difference between students’ and educators’ perspectives of their role was their description of how to build knowledge within clinical placement settings. Clinical educators’ focused on steps involved in their teaching tasks, rather than ways to facilitate learning. Their conception of teaching was to impart structured knowledge to students in response to knowledge deficits. Students also identified knowledge gaps but they proposed alternative practical ways to build their knowledge. Their conception of learning was to move from an initial static identification of knowledge deficits, to a more dynamic search for methods and people that might build their knowledge and understanding. Conclusions: The findings of this research were used to develop a set of teaching and learning statements and strategies that are grounded in the perspectives and experiences of students and educators in the clinical education setting.

Physical therapist practice has a distinct focus that is holistic (ie, patient centered) and at the same time connected to a range of other providers within health care systems. Although there is a growing body of literature in physical therapy ethics knowledge, including clinical obligations and underlying philosophical principles, less is known about the unique ethical issues that physical therapists encounter, and how and why they make ethical decisions. As moral agents, physical therapists are required to make autonomous clinical and ethical decisions based on connections and relationships with their patients, other health care team members, and health institutions and policies. This article identifies specific ethical dimensions of physical therapist practice and highlights the development and focus of ethics knowledge in physical therapy over the last several decades. An applied ethics model, called the “active engagement model,” is proposed to integrate clinical and ethical dimensions of practice with the theoretical knowledge and literature about ethics. The active engagement model has 3 practical steps: to listen actively, to think reflexively, and to reason critically. The model focuses on the underlying skills, attitudes, and actions that are required to build a sense of moral agency and purpose within physical therapist practice and to decrease gaps between the ethical dimensions of physical therapist practice and physical therapy ethics knowledge and scholarship. A clinical case study is provided to illustrate how the ethics engagement model might be used to analyze and provide insight into the ethical dimensions of physical therapist practice.