Geneviève Petitpierre

Dr. Geneviève Petitpierre


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2015 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAnne-Claude Luisier
Anne-Claude Luisier
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre
CFCamille Ferdenzi
Camille Ferdenzi
ABAnnick Clerc Bérod
Annick Clerc Bérod
AGAgnes Giboreau
Agnes Giboreau
MBMoustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi
Atypical sensory functioning in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has been well documented in the last decade for the visual, tactile and auditory systems, but olfaction in ASD is still understudied. The aim of the present study was to examine whether children with ASD and neuro-typically (NT) developed children differed in odor perception, at the cognitive (familiarity and identification ability), sensorimotor (olfactory exploration) and affective levels (hedonic evaluation). Because an important function of the sense of smell is its involvement in eating, from food selection to appreciation and recognition, a potential link between odor perception and food neophobia was also investigated. To these ends, 10 children between 6 and 13 years old diagnosed with ASD and 10 NT control children were tested. To compare performance, 16 stimuli were used and food neophobia was assessed by the parents on a short food neophobia scale. Results revealed that (i) significant hedonic discrimination between attractive and aversive odors was observed in NT (p=0.005; d=2.378) and ASD children (p=0.042; d=0.941), and (ii) hedonic discrimination level was negatively correlated with food neophobia scores in ASD (p=0.007) but not NT children. In conclusion, this study offers new insights into odor perception in ASD children, highlighting a relationship between odor hedonic reactivity and eating behavior. This opens up new perspectives on both (i) the role of olfaction in the construction of eating behavior in ASD children, and (ii) the measurement and meaning of food neophobia in this population.

1 May 2021 in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NRNicola Rudelli
Nicola Rudelli
CSClaudio Straccia
Claudio Straccia
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre

29 November 2018 in Autism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAnne-Claude Luisier
Anne-Claude Luisier
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre
ABAnnick Clerc Bérod
Annick Clerc Bérod
DGDavid Garcia-Burgos
David Garcia-Burgos
MBMoustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi
This study assessed whether olfactory familiarization can render food odors more pleasant, and consequently food more attractive, to children with autism spectrum disorder. Participants were first presented with a series of food odors (session 1). Then, they were familiarized on four occasions (time window: 5 weeks) with one of the two most neutral odors (the other neutral odor was used as control) (session 2). In session 3, participants smelled the entire series of odors again. Both verbal and facial responses were compared from session 1 to session 3. After session 3, the children were presented with two identical foods (one containing the familiarized odor and one the control odor) and were asked to choose between these foods. Results revealed (1) a specific increase in positive emotions for the familiarized odor and (2) that 68% of the children chose the food associated with the “familiarized odor” (children who chose the “familiarized odor” food exhibited significantly more sensory particularities). These findings suggest that it is possible to modulate olfactory emotions and expand the dietary repertoire of children with autism spectrum disorder. Application of this paradigm may enable innovative prospects for food education in autism.

13 February 2019 in Perception
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAnne-Claude Luisier
Anne-Claude Luisier
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre
ABAnnick Clerc Bérod
Annick Clerc Bérod
ARAnne-Raphaëlle Richoz
Anne-Raphaëlle Richoz
JLJunpeng Lao
Junpeng Lao
MBMoustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi
The present study examined whether children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) children differed in visual perception of food stimuli at both sensorimotor and affective levels. A potential link between visual perception and food neophobia was also investigated. To these aims, 11 children with ASD and 11 TD children were tested. Visual pictures of food were used, and food neophobia was assessed by the parents. Results revealed that children with ASD explored visually longer food stimuli than TD children. Complementary analyses revealed that whereas TD children explored more multiple-item dishes (vs. simple-item dishes), children with ASD explored all the dishes in a similar way. In addition, children with ASD gave more negative appreciation in general. Moreover, hedonic rating was negatively correlated with food neophobia scores in children with ASD, but not in TD children. In sum, we show here that children with ASD have more difficulty than TD children in liking a food when presented visually. Our findings also suggest that a prominent factor that needs to be considered is time management during the food choice process. They also provide new ways of measuring and understanding food neophobia in children with ASD.

3 December 2021 in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre
JDJuliane Dind
Juliane Dind
CBCatherine De Blasio
Catherine De Blasio
GGGermaine Gremaud
Germaine Gremaud
Background Olfaction provides information on very important dimensions of the environment; however the olfactory abilities of children and young people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) remain largely unknown. This within-subjects study explores olfactory detection abilities in children with PIMD. Method Twenty-two children and young people with PIMD (7–18 years) were presented with 18 medium intensity odours and an odourless control stimulus. Odorants were presented one by one in a randomised order. The neutral stimulus was presented prior to each odorant. Participants' responses were measured using 21 behavioural indicators. Results Results show that participants make a clear distinction between odorous and neutral conditions, between food and non-food, and between pleasant and unpleasant odours. The detection abilities are manifested by several behaviours, in particular by the duration of the head alignment on the odorant. Conclusions This study shows that participants detect the stimuli and act differently depending on the category.

31 March 2016 in Contraste
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGeneviève Petitpierre
Geneviève Petitpierre
RSRégine Scelles
Régine Scelles
MBMartine Bungener
Martine Bungener
JDJean-Jacques Detraux
Jean-Jacques Detraux
MTMireille Tremblay
Mireille Tremblay
Les chercheurs dans le champ du « handicap » sont de plus en plus sollicités par des acteurs sociaux, économiques et politiques qui souhaitent faire de la recherche pour répondre aux questions qu’ils se posent. Cet article coécrit par des chercheurs de trois pays différents vise à faire un état des lieux de ces pratiques de recherche en soulignant les prérequis en matière de formation à la recherche et de méthodologie qu’elles nécessitent. Il propose des pistes pour faire en sorte que ces recherches soient menées scientifiquement dans des conditions de collaboration qui doivent se construire avant le début de l’étude.