Nosocomial infections are a frequent and serious problem in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Donor human milk (DHM) is the best alternative for feeding these babies when mother’s own milk (MOM) is not available. Recently, a patented prototype of a High-Temperature Short-Time (HTST) pasteurizer adapted to a human milk bank setting showed a lesser impact on immunologic components. We designed a multicentre randomized controlled trial that investigates whether, in ELBW infants with an insufficient MOM supply, the administration of HTST pasteurized DHM reduces the incidence of confirmed catheter-associated sepsis compared to DHM pasteurized with the Holder method. From birth until 34 weeks postmenstrual age, patients included in the study received DHM, as a supplement, pasteurized by the Holder or HTST method. A total of 213 patients were randomized; 79 (HTST group) and 81 (Holder group) were included in the analysis. We found no difference in the frequency of nosocomial sepsis between the patients of the two methods—41.8% (33/79) of HTST group patients versus 45.7% (37/81) of Holder group patients, relative risk 0.91 (0.64–1.3), p = 0.62. In conclusion, when MOM is not available, supplementing during admission with DHM pasteurized by the HTST versus Holder method might not have an impact on the incidence of catheter-associated sepsis.
Background/Objectives: To obtain bioelectrical data to assess nutritional status for extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants upon reaching term-corrected age. Methods: A descriptive, observational, prospective, and single-center study, which included ELBW preterm infants was performed. The study variables collected were gestational age, sex, and anthropometry at birth and at term-corrected age. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) was performed by a phase-sensitive device (BIA 101 BIVA PRO AKERN srl, Pisa, Italy). The components of the impedance vector—resistance (R) and reactance (Xc)—were normalized for body height (H). For each subject, the measurement was taken between the 36th and 44th weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA). A semi-quantitative analysis of body composition was performed using the vector modality of the BIA. Using the RXc graph method, the bivariate 95% confidence intervals of the mean vectors were constructed. From the bivariate normal distribution of R/H and Xc/H, the bivariate 95%, 75%, and 50% tolerance intervals for this cohort were drawn. The individual impedance vectors were compared with the distribution of the vectors from other populations. Results: 85 ELBW infants (40 male, 45 female) were included, with a mean gestational age at birth of 26 + 6 weeks (±1.76). Mean R/H was 870.33 (±143.21) Ohm/m and Xc/H was 86.84 (±19.05) Ohm/m. We found differences in the bioelectrical data with regard to gender, with resistance values being significantly higher in females. Our ellipses align closely with those from other term neonatal cohorts. Conclusions: Bioelectrical data and the confidence and tolerance ellipses of an ELBW infant cohort are presented and can be used as a reference standard for nutritional assessment at discharge.
Background/Objectives: To obtain bioelectrical data to assess nutritional status for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants upon reaching term corrected age. Methods: A descriptive, observational, prospective and single-center study which included ELBW preterm infants was performed. The study variables collected were: gestational age, sex and anthropometry at birth and at term corrected age. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) was performed by a phase sensitive device (BIA 101 BIVA PRO AKERN srl, Pisa, Italy). The components of the impedance vector –resistance (R) and reactance (Xc)– were normalized for body height (H). For each subject, the measurement was taken between the 36 th and 44 th week of postmenstrual age (PMA). A semi-quantitative analysis of body composition was performed using the vector modality of the BIA. Using the RXc graph method, the bivariate 95% confidence intervals of the mean vectors were constructed. From the bivariate normal distribution of R/H and Xc/H, the bivariate 95%, 75%, and 50% tolerance intervals for this cohort were drawn. The individual impedance vectors were compared with the distribution of the vectors from other populations. Results: 85 ELBW infants (40 male, 45 female) were included, with a mean gestational age at birth of 26+6 weeks (± 1.76). Mean R/H was 870.33 (±143.21) Ohm/m and Xc/H was 86.84 (± 19.05) Ohm/m. We found differences in the bioelectrical data with regard to gender, with resistance values being significantly higher in females. Our ellipses align closely with those from other term neonatal cohorts. Conclusions: Bioelectrical data and the confidence and tolerance ellipses of an ELBW infant cohort are presented and can be used as a reference standard for nutritional assessment at discharge.