Several studies have shown the effects of e-cigarettes in adults. Nowadays, few data are available in the pediatric population. This study aims to assess the relationship between asthma exacerbations and home exposure to e-cigarettes. We conducted a pilot, retrospective, monocenter, observational study. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including number of asthma exacerbations, need for rescue therapy and/or therapeutic step-up, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) and children-Asthma Control Test (c-ACT) scores. The cohort consisted of 54 patients (5–17 years old), divided into two groups: A, including patients exposed to e-cigarette aerosols; B, including unexposed patients. The statistical analysis showed no relevant variation in the number of asthma symptomatic days and need for rescue therapy in group A versus group B (p = 0.27 and 0.19, respectively). There were no statistically significant variations when also considering the number of patients who needed a therapeutic step-up (p = 0.3). The mean values of ACT and c-ACT were, respectively, 17.2 ± 7.6 and 18.3 ± 5.6 in group A and 19.6 ± 3.8 and 14.6 ± 5.8 in group B (p = 0.3 and 0.4, respectively). Although we did not find a statistically significant correlation between second-hand e-cigarette exposure and asthma exacerbations, our findings suggest that asthmatic children exposed second-hand to e-cigarettes may have increased risk of asthma symptomatic days. Future research is warranted.

Background: Molecular syndromic stool panels are increasingly used in paediatric diarrheal syndromes; however, interpretation of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) detection remains challenging because colonisation is common in younger children. We aimed to assess the frequency of C. difficile detection using a syndromic gastrointestinal panel in a paediatric tertiary-care centre and to describe the subsequent microbiological work-up and CDI-directed treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of all BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) panels performed at San Marco Hospital (University Hospital “G. Rodolico-San Marco”, Catania, Italy) from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2025. Only the first C. difficile-positive result per patient was included; repeat positives within 30 days were excluded. Index-positive episodes were stratified by age (<1 year, 1 to <2 years, and ≥2 years). Data collected included co-detected pathogens, toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results, GeneXpert PCR findings, and CDI-directed therapy. Results: Among the 714 GI panels performed during the study period, 112 (15.7%) were positive for C. difficile. After exclusion of repeat positives, 91 index-positive episodes were analysed. Median age was 1.0 years (IQR 0.75–4.0), and 48/91 cases (52.7%) occurred in children younger than two years. Toxin A/B EIA was positive in 11/82 tested episodes (13.4%), whereas GeneXpert tcdB was positive in 75/84 episodes (89.3%). Co-detection of at least one additional enteric pathogen occurred in 40/91 cases (44.0%). CDI-directed therapy was administered in 9/91 episodes (9.9%), mainly in children aged ≥2 years. Conclusions: Detection of C. difficile by syndromic molecular panels was relatively frequent in our paediatric cohort but rarely associated with toxin positivity or the need for specific treatment. These findings suggest that many positive Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) results may represent colonisation rather than true infection, particularly in younger children. Careful clinical interpretation of syndromic panel results is therefore essential to avoid overdiagnosis and unnecessary antimicrobial therapy.

Papilledema is a potentially vision-threatening finding in children, often diagnosed during routine ophthalmological evaluation in asymptomatic subjects, which requires prompt diagnostic evaluation to exclude intracranial pathology. The available literature suggests that a significant proportion of cases with confirmed idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) may present without headache or other manifestations of increased intracranial pressure. Current diagnostic criteria for pediatric IIH include lumbar puncture (LP) as a mandatory step following neuroimaging. However, the invasive nature of this procedure raises critical questions regarding the identification of patients who truly require this investigation. Indeed, the challenge of distinguishing true papilledema from pseudopapilledema represents the critical diagnostic prerequisite, requiring an expert pediatric neuro-ophthalmologist to ensure appropriate patient selection and avoid unnecessary tests. Evidence regarding the management of asymptomatic IIH is limited. Most published cohorts report treatment with acetazolamide despite the absence of symptoms, probably based on concerns regarding potential visual deterioration rather than prospective data. Currently, data from pediatric populations characterizing the natural history of untreated patients are lacking, and there is no consensus regarding treatment duration, tapering strategies, or long-term follow-up for this group. This narrative review summarizes the current literature on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for asymptomatic pediatric papilledema. It focuses on the role of lumbar puncture, the importance of differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema, and the uncertainties surrounding treatment decisions. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the optimal management of these patients, highlighting the need for prospective studies.