Patients with respiratory failure may benefit from veno-venous and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We report on our initial experience of veno-veno-arterial (v-v-a) ECMO in patients with respiratory failure. Between January 2012 and February 2014, 406 patients required ECMO support at our institution. Here, we retrospectively analysed the characteristics and outcomes of patients commenced on either veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO due to respiratory failure, and then switched to v-v-a ECMO. Ten (2%) patients proceeded to v-v-a ECMO. The underlying conditions were acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 3), end-stage pulmonary fibrosis (n = 5) and respiratory failure after major thoracic surgery (n = 1) and Caesarean section (n = 1). In all of these patients, ECMO was initially started as veno-venous (n = 9) or veno-arterial (n = 1) ECMO but was switched to a veno-veno-arterial (v-v-a) approach after a mean of 2 (range, 0–7) days. Reasons for switching were: haemodynamic instability (right heart failure, n = 5; pericardial tamponade, n = 1; severe mitral valve regurgitation, n = 1; haemodynamic instability following cardiopulmonary resuscitation, n = 1 and evidence of previously unknown atrial septal defect with pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger syndrome, n = 1) and upper-body hypoxaemia (n = 1). ECMO-related complications were bleeding (n = 3) and leg ischaemia (n = 2). Seven patients were successfully taken off ECMO with 4 being bridged to recovery and a further 3 to lung transplantation after a mean of 11 (range, 9–18) days. Five patients survived until hospital discharge and all of them were alive at the end of the follow-up. Veno-veno-arterial ECMO is a technically feasible rescue strategy in treating patients presenting with combined respiratory and haemodynamic failure.

Allogeneic lung transplantation (LuTx) is considered the treatment of choice for a broad range of advanced, progressive lung diseases resistant to conventional treatment regimens. Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) occurring upon reperfusion of the explanted, ischemic lung during implantation remains a crucial mediator of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and early allo-immune responses. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) displays an advanced technique aiming at improving lung procurement and preservation. Indeed, previous clinical trials have demonstrated a reduced incidence of PGD following LuTx utilizing EVLP, while long-term outcomes are yet to be evaluated. Mechanistically, EVLP may alleviate donor lung inflammation through reconditioning the injured lung and diminishing IRI through storing the explanted lung in a non-ischemic, perfused, and ventilated status. In this work, we review potential mechanisms of EVLP that may attenuate IRI and improve organ quality. Moreover, we dissect experimental treatment approaches during EVLP that may further attenuate inflammatory events deriving from tissue ischemia, shear forces or allograft rejection associated with LuTx.

During recent years, continuous technological innovation has provoked an increase of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for perioperative cardiopulmonary support in lung transplantation. Initial results were disappointing, due to ECLS-specific complications and high surgical risk of the supported patients. However, the combination of improved patient management, multidisciplinary team work and standardization of ECLS protocols has recently yielded excellent results in several case series from high-volume transplant centres. Therein, it was demonstrated that, although the prevalence of complications remains higher in supported patients, there may be no difference in long-term graft function between supported and non-supported patients. These results are important, because most of the patients who require ECLS support in lung transplantation are young and have no other chance to survive, but to be transplanted. Moreover, there is no device for “bridging to destination” therapy in lung transplantation. Of note, the evidence in favour of ECLS support in lung transplantation was never validated by randomized controlled trials, but by everyday experience at the patient bed-side. Here, we review the state-of-the-art ECLS evidence for intraoperative and postoperative cardiopulmonary support in lung transplantation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has an important role in bridging patients to lung transplantation. In this study, we present our experience with pretransplant ECMO during the last 7 years and investigate its impact on graft outcomes. Records of all lung-transplanted patients at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival was compared between patients who required pretransplant ECMO (pre-Tx ECMO+) and patients who did not (pre-Tx ECMO−). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality and graft survival were identified using a binary logistic regression and the Cox regression analyses, respectively. Among the 917 patients transplanted during the study period, 68 (7%) required ECMO as a bridge to transplantation [awake strategy, n = 57 (84%) patients]. Median bridging time was 9 days. Among pre-Tx ECMO+ patients, the need for haemodialysis at any point during bridging emerged as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 7.79, 95% confidence interval 1.21–50.24; P = 0.031). Although in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in pre-Tx ECMO+ versus pre-Tx ECMO− patients (15% vs 5%, P = 0.003), overall graft survival did not differ between groups (79% vs 90% and 61% vs 68% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, P = 0.13). Pretransplant ECMO did not emerge as a risk factor for graft survival in the multivariable analysis. If applied in selected patients in a high-volume centre, pretransplant ECMO as a bridge to transplantation results in impaired, but still high in-hospital, survival and does not impact graft survival.