Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an integral component of the management of various cancers and have contributed to significant improvements in overall survival. Most available ICIs target anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4), and anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD1/PDL1). Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events remain a common complication of ICIs. The predominant manifestations include diarrhea and colitis, which often manifest concurrently as immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC). Risk factors for developing these side effects include baseline gut microbiota, preexisting autoimmune disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, and type of neoplasm. The hallmark symptom of colitis is diarrhea which may be accompanied by mucus or blood in stools. Patients may also experience abdominal pain, fever, vomiting, and nausea. If not treated rapidly, ICI-induced colitis can lead to serious life-threatening complications. Current management is based on corticosteroids as first-line, and immunosuppressants like infliximab or vedolizumab for refractory cases. Microbiota transplantation and specific cytokines and lymphocyte replication inhibitors are being investigated. Optimal patient care requires maintaining a balance between treatment toxicity and efficacy, hence the aim of this review is to enhance readers’ comprehension of the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with ICIs, particularly IMDC. In addition to identifying the risk factors, we discuss the incidence, clinical presentation, workup, and management options of IMDC.

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient’s condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.

Background: The efficacy of immunotherapies in soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) is limited, and biomarkers of response are lacking. The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is a prognostic biomarker used with immunotherapy across cancer types. This study investigates the association of LIPI with the disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with STS treated with immunotherapy versus other therapies in early-phase trials. Methods: This post hoc analysis was conducted with patients with STS from Gustave Roussy and Centre Léon Bérard between January 2012 and June 2021. The LIPI was calculated based on a derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3 and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Patients were categorized based on treatment (immunotherapy or other) and LIPI (good, intermediate, or poor). DCR was defined as the sum of stable disease and complete and partial response. Results: A total of 82 patients were enrolled in immunotherapy trials and 126 in the other therapy trials. In the immunotherapy group, DCR was higher in patients with good LIPI (76%; n = 23/30) compared with the intermediate (50%; n = 13/26) and poor LIPI groups (8%; n = 1/12; p < 0.001). The other-therapy group did not show significant differences in DCR by LIPI: DCR was 70% (n = 48/69), 70% (n = 21/30), and 60% (n = 6/10) in patients with good, intermediate, and poor LIPI, respectively (p = 0.86). In multivariate analyses, LIPI was independently associated with PFS in the immunotherapy group (hazard ratio = 5.97, p = 0.0001) and not in the control group (p = 0.71). Conclusions: LIPI is a significant independent prognostic marker for DCR in patients with STS treated with immunotherapy. In early-phase trials, LIPI could be used as a screening tool for stratification at inclusion. High neutrophil levels, which correlate with a poorer LIPI score, are likely associated with immunotherapy resistance. This relationship could explain the statistical impact of poor LIPI in the immunotherapy group.

Background: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs) are amongst the most common subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas. Few real-world data on the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in UPS patients and other high-grade pleomorphic STS patients are available. Purpose: The purpose of our study is to describe the efficacy and toxicity of ICB in patients with advanced UPSs and other high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas treated at our institution. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study of all patients with metastatic high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas treated with FDA-approved ICB at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2023. Patients included in trials for which results are not yet published were excluded. Results: Thirty-six patients with advanced/metastatic pleomorphic sarcomas were included. The median age was 52 years. A total of 26 patients (72%) had UPSs and 10 patients (28%) had other high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas. The median follow-up time was 8.8 months. The median PFS was 2.9 months. The 3-month PFS and 6-month PFS were 46% and 32%, respectively. The median OS was 12.9 months. The 12-month OS and 24-month OS were 53% and 29%, respectively. The best response, previous RT, and type of ICB treatment were significantly and independently associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.0012, p = 0.0019 and p = 0.036, respectively). No new safety signal was identified, and the toxicity was overall manageable with no toxic deaths and only four patients (11%) stopping treatment due to toxicity. Conclusions: Real-world retrospective data are consistent with the published literature, with a promising 6-month PFS of 32%. Partial or stable responders to ICB treatment have significantly improved PFS compared to progressors.

Le 4 août 2020, vers 18h00, un entrepôt du port de Beyrouth contenant 2 750 tonnes de nitrate d’ammonium a explosé engendrant la plus grande explosion urbaine depuis Hiroshima et Nagasaki. Au cœur de ce désastre, la Croix-Rouge libanaise (CRL) a répondu à l’appel, et s’est déployée sur la totalité de la zone sinistrée offrant tout genre de service au peuple dévasté. Au total, plus de 4 000 patients ont été traités sur place et plus de 2 600 ont été transportés vers les hôpitaux de Beyrouth et du Mont Liban. Dans une époque où le Liban est profondément secoué par une crise économique étouffante et par la pandémie de la COVID-19, les défis rencontrés ont été majeurs. La documentation de cet évènement et l’évaluation des réponses de la CRL sont des éléments clés pour l’amélioration de la gestion de catastrophe. Vue la rareté du contexte, les leçons à tirer sont nombreuses.