The development of healthy building technology has become a major trend in the global construction industry, especially in China, owing to accelerating urbanization and increasing health awareness among residents. However, an effective evaluation framework to quantify and evaluate the maturity of healthy building technology is lacking. This paper proposes a novel maturity evaluation model for healthy building technology. After analyzing the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework for asserting the maturity of healthy building in China, it constructs an evaluation indicator system, comprising five and twenty-seven first- and second-class indicators, respectively. Subsequently, this paper constructs an improved projection pursuit model based on border collie optimization. The model obtains evaluation results by mining evaluation data, thus overcoming the limitations of traditional evaluation models in dealing with complex data. The empirical research results demonstrate that China is in the optimization stage in terms of the level of maturity of healthy building technology. The weight of impact is as high as 0.2743, which is the most important first-level indicator. Strict green energy utilization policy requirements are the most important secondary indicator, with a weight of 0.0513. Notably, the model is more advanced than other algorithms. In addition, this paper offers some countermeasures and suggestions to promote healthy building in China. Developing and applying this model can promote and popularize healthy building technology in China and even the globe and contribute to a healthier and more sustainable living environment.

Vulnerability assessments of public service buildings (PSBs) are critical to life cycle management. An accurate evaluation can substantially improve the quality of public services and reduce the government’s financial burden. We proposed a WBS-VBS framework to build a vulnerability decomposition matrix for PSBs. A Chinese vocational education center relocation case study validated the method. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to normalize the path coefficients and obtain the index weights. The matter-element extension method was utilized to calculate correlation functions and determine the vulnerability levels of different indicators. The case study results demonstrate the effectiveness of the model.

Evaluating the aquatic ecological and environmental consequences of dredging projects with precision is essential for reconciling engineering objectives with the long-term health of aquatic ecosystems. This study establishes an evaluation system for the aquatic ecological and environmental impacts of dredging engineering based on the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) analytical framework, and constructs a comprehensive assessment system through Velocity Pausing Particle Swarm Optimization–Projection Pursuit (VPPSO-PP) coupled with fuzzy pattern recognition. Taking the Pinglu Canal project as a case study, the objective weights of indicators are obtained via the VPPSO-PP method, and the impact levels are determined by combining the fuzzy pattern recognition model. Case studies show that the quality of discharged residual water is the most critical factor affecting the aquatic ecological environment, ranking highest with a weight of 0.0839, followed by the proportion of aquatic ecological restoration investment at 0.0685. Among the five typical dredging sections of the Pinglu Canal, the Shaping River section and the Offshore Estuary Section were rated as having a “mild impact.” In contrast, the Main Stream of Qinjiang River section, the Watershed section, and the Qinzhou urban section were rated as having a “moderate impact.” These evaluation results are consistent with the actual engineering conditions. The model developed in this study enables a quantitative and objective assessment of the aquatic ecological impacts of dredging projects. It provides a scientific basis and a practical tool for ecological management and decision-making in dredging operations.