Teresa A. Paço

Prof. Dr. Teresa A. Paço

Research Center LEAF, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2007 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJ. S. Pereira
J. S. Pereira
JMJ. A. Mateus
J. A. Mateus
LALuis Miguel Igreja Aires
Luis Miguel Igreja Aires
GPG. Pita
G. Pita
CPC. Pio
C. Pio
Abel RodriguesAbel Rodrigues
Abel Rodrigues
Droughts reduce gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco), contributing to most of the inter-annual variability in terrestrial carbon sequestration. In seasonally dry climates (Mediterranean), droughts result from reductions in annual rainfall and changes in rain seasonality. We compared carbon fluxes measured by the eddy covariance technique in three contrasting ecosystems in southern Portugal: an evergreen oak woodland (savannah-like) with ca.~21% tree crown cover, a grassland dominated by herbaceous annuals and a coppiced short-rotation eucalyptus plantation. During the experimental period (2003–2006) the eucalyptus plantation was always the strongest sink for carbon: net ecosystem exchange rate (NEE) between −861 and −399 g C m−2 year−1. The oak woodland and the grassland were much weaker sinks for carbon: NEE varied in the oak woodland between −140 and −28 g C m−2 year−1 and in the grassland between −190 and +49 g C m−2 year−1. The eucalyptus stand had higher GPP and a lower proportion of GPP spent in respiration than the other systems. The higher GPP resulted from high leaf area duration (LAD), as a surrogate for the photosynthetic photon flux density absorbed by the canopy. The eucalyptus had also higher rain use efficiency (GPP per unit of rain volume) and light use efficiency (the daily GPP per unit incident photosynthetic photon flux density) than the other two ecosystems. The effects of a severe drought could be evaluated during the hydrological-year (i.e., from October to September) of 2004–2005. Between October 2004 and June 2005 the precipitation was only 40% of the long-term average. In 2004–2005 all ecosystems had GPP lower than in wetter years and carbon sequestration was strongly restricted (less negative NEE). The grassland was a net source of carbon dioxide (+49 g C m−2 year−1). In the oak woodland a large proportion of GPP resulted from carbon assimilated by its annual vegetation component, which was strongly affected by the shortage of rain in winter. Overall, severe drought affected more GPP than Reco leading to the deterioration of NEE. Although the rain-use efficiency of the eucalyptus plantation increased in the dry year, this was not the case of evergreen oak woodland, which rain-use efficiency was not influenced by drought. Recovery after drought alleviation, i.e., beginning with heavy rain in October 2005, was fully accomplished in 2006 in the oak woodland and grassland, but slow in the eucalyptus plantation.

11 April 2013 in Irrigation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BZBaozhong Zhang
Baozhong Zhang
YLYu Liu
Yu Liu
DXDi Xu
Di Xu
NZNana Zhao
Nana Zhao
BLBo Lei
Bo Lei
Luis Santos PereiraLuis Santos Pereira
Luis Santos Pereira


2 December 2019 in Blue-Green Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSiv Lene Gangenes Skar
Siv Lene Gangenes Skar
RPR. Pineda-Martos
R. Pineda-Martos
ATA. Timpe
A. Timpe
BPBernd Pölling
Bernd Pölling
KBK. Bohn
K. Bohn
Ranka JungeRanka Junge
Ranka Junge
Research and practice during the last 20 years has shown that urban agriculture can contribute to minimising the effects of climate change by, at the same time, improving quality of life in urban areas. In order to do so most effectively, land use and spatial planning are crucial so as to obtain and maintain a supportive green infrastructure and to secure citizens' healthy living conditions. As people today trend more towards living in green and sustainable city centres that can offer fresh and locally produced food, cities become again places for growing food. The scope of urban agriculture thereby is to establish food production sites within the city's sphere; for example, through building-integrated agriculture including concepts such as aquaponics, indoor agriculture, vertical farming, rooftop production, edible walls, as well as through urban farms, edible landscapes, school gardens and community gardens. Embedded in changing urban food systems, the contribution of urban agriculture to creating sustainable and climate-friendly cities is pivotal as it has the capacity to integrate other resource streams such as water, waste and energy. This article describes some of the current aspects of the circular city debate where urban agriculture is pushing forward the development of material and resource cycling in cities.

1 May 2021 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni RalloGiovanni Rallo
Giovanni Rallo
Teresa A. PaçoTeresa A. Paço
Teresa A. Paço
Paula ParedesPaula Paredes
Paula Paredes
ÀPÀ. Puig-Sirera
À. Puig-Sirera
RMR. Massai
R. Massai
LPL.S. Pereira
L.S. Pereira