Threshold tracking was used to compare excitability properties (stimulus–response curves, strength–duration properties, recovery cycle and threshold electrotonus) of the median nerve in 11 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 25 healthy controls. Stimulus–response curves were significantly different: threshold was much higher, the slope of the curves reduced and the spread of the thresholds greater in the CIDP group. The strength–duration time constant (τ_SD) was significantly shorter and the rheobase higher in the CIDP group. In the recovery cycle, the CIDP group had less refractoriness, supernormality and late subnormality than healthy controls, but the duration of the relatively refractory period was normal. These changes in τ_SD and the recovery cycle were not those previously predicted. There were no consistent changes in threshold electrotonus, suggesting that, for the studied axons, there are no consistent changes in accommodation properties that depend on internodal conductances. It is difficult to explain these changes in excitability on the basis of a change in membrane potential, or solely as the result of demyelination, and it is possible that other morphological factors such as variable remyelination and inflammatory oedema affected axonal excitability in the patients.

Background: Elderly patients account for 30% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but are under-represented in randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Meta-analysis of “real world” studies evaluating 90-day outcomes in elderly patients ≥80 years have been limited to small numbers undergoing EVT with older generation devices. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 181 prospectively collected patients who received EVT for anterior circulation AIS at an Australian center over 2.5-years. The study aims to determine (i) 90-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale mRS 0–2) in patients ≥80 vs. <80 years, (ii) the interaction of prognostic factors and age and (iii) compare our data to those previously reported using a meta-analysis of outcomes in observational studies using second generation thrombectomy devices. Results: We analyzed 2,387 patients (≥80 years, n = 649; <80 years, n = 1,738) from 14 studies including our study (≥80 years, n = 71; <80 years, n = 110). Twenty-eight percent of our and 30% of the meta-analysis elderly cohort achieved good 90-day mRS compared to 55 and 52%, respectively of younger patients (p < 0.001). Twenty-seven percent of our and 26% of the meta-analysis elderly cohort died compared to 16% (p = 0.07) and 15% (p < 0.0001), respectively of younger patients. Baseline NIHSS≥16 correlated with poor prognosis in elderly (OR 16.4; 95% CI 4.49–59.91, p < 0.001) and younger (OR 8.73;95% CI 3.35–22.80, p < 0.001) patients. Prior rt-PA was associated with favorable outcome in younger (OR 2.90; 95%CI 1.29–6.52, p = 0.01) patients only. Conclusion: EVT has less favorable outcomes in elderly patients. However, results are better than outcomes in historical controls not treated with thrombectomy providing further support for EVT in the elderly.