The aim of this study was to assess the role of climate variability on the incidence of dengue fever (DF), an endemic arboviral infection existing in Jakarta, Indonesia. The work carried out included analysis of the spatial distribution of confirmed DF cases from January 2007 to December 2018 characterising the sociodemographical and ecological factors in DF high-risk areas. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to examine the relationship between DF incidence and climatic factors. Spatial clustering and hotspots of DF were examined using global Moran’s I statistic and the local indicator for spatial association analysis. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to compare and identify demographical and socio-ecological characteristics of the identified hotspots and low-risk clusters. The seasonality of DF incidence was correlated with precipitation (r=0.254, P<0.01), humidity (r=0.340, P<0.01), dipole mode index (r= –0.459, P<0.01) and Tmin (r= –0.181, P<0.05). DF incidence was spatially clustered at the village level (I=0.294, P<0.001) and 22 hotspots were identified with a concentration in the central and eastern parts of Jakarta. CART analysis showed that age and occupation were the most important factors explaining DF clustering. Areaspecific and population-targeted interventions are needed to improve the situation among those living in the identified DF high-risk areas in Jakarta.

In Indonesia, COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy persists among health care workers (HCWs). Understanding the motives and challenges impacting HCWs’ acceptance of the booster vaccination is critical. Efforts are still needed to overcome apprehension about taking a booster dosage. This study aims to analyze the vaccine acceptance among HCWs in Jakarta using an extended, modified model of health behavior theories, namely The Health Belief Model (HBM) and The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). A cross-sectional survey from November 2021 to January 2022 was distributed to health care workers in Jakarta. Bivariate analysis followed by multivariate regression was used to assess factors associated with the vaccine intention and collected 1684 responses. The results have shown that the final model combining the constructs and demographic characteristics could explain 50% of the variance of intention to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccination. Moreover, anticipated regret had the most significant standardized coefficient among the constructs (β = 0.381, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors in the model were attitude (β = 0.243, p < 0.001), perceived benefits (β = 0.103, p < 0.001), subjective norms (β = 0.08, p = 0.005), and perceived susceptibility (β = 0.051, p = 0.016). The findings can be used to strategize interventions to increase vaccine uptake.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been extensively researched, particularly with regard to COVID-19 vaccines. However, issues with logistics and availability might cause delays in vaccination programs. Thus, the efficacy and safety of half-dose heterologous mRNA should be explored. This was an open-label observational study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of half-dose mRNA-1273 as a booster vaccine among adults aged >18 years who underwent a complete primary SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) vaccination regimen with CoronaVac^® and ChAdOx1-S. Adverse events (AEs), seropositivity rate, seroconversion, geometric mean titer (GMT) of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, and T cells (CD4+ and CD8+) specific for SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed. Two hundred subjects were included in the final analysis, with 100 subjects in each priming vaccine group. Most of the AEs were mild, with systemic manifestations occurring between 1 and 7 days following vaccination. A significant difference was observed in the GMT and seropositivity rate following booster dose administration between the two groups. CD8+/CD3+, IFN (interferon)-producing CD8+, and TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-producing CD8+ cells showed significant increases in both groups. The administration of the half-dose mRNA-1273 booster is safe and effective in increasing protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background: Numerous studies have proved the efficacy of vaccination in reducing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) burden. However, even though the COVID-19 vaccination coverage is high for primary doses, a booster dose is needed to sustain protection. Continuing our previous research, this study evaluates the immunogenicity and safety of full and half doses of two COVID-19 booster vaccines, ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), in individuals primed with ChAdOx1-S. Methods: This study was an observer-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of half and full doses of two COVID-19 booster vaccine types, BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S, among fully vaccinated, ChAdOx1-S-primed individuals in Jakarta, Indonesia. A total of 329 participants were randomized to receive either full or half doses of the booster vaccines, namely the ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines. Immunogenicity was assessed through SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) at 28 days post-booster, while safety was monitored via adverse event reporting. Results: The results showed that both vaccines demonstrated increased geometric mean titers (GMTs) post-booster. In the ChAdOx1-S booster group, at the baseline visit (day 0) and third visit (day 28), no statistically significant differences in GMT between the half- and full-dose groups were observed (p = 0.970 and 0.539, respectively). In the BNT162b2 group, no statistically significant difference was noted at the baseline visit, while the full dose was higher than the half dose at 28 days (Day 28, p = 0.011). Surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNTs) and NAbs assays also revealed no significant differences between the half and full dose groups for both the Wuhan strain and the Delta variant. The BNT162b2 group compared to the ChAdOx1-S group revealed a statistically significant increase in IgG levels compared to ChAdOx1-S, with p-values of <0.001 and <0.001 for the half dose and full dose, respectively. This was also reflected in the NAbs test results, where BNT162b2 showed significantly higher levels against both the Wuhan strain and Delta variant. Adverse events were predominantly mild: 79.6% (n = 86/108) in the ChAdOx1-S full-dose group, 75.4% (n = 43/57) in the ChAdOx1-S half-dose group, 84.2% (n = 101/120) in the BNT162b2 full-dose group, and 92.6% (n = 88/95) in the BNT162b2 half-dose group, with pain at the injection site being the most common local reaction and myalgia and headache the most frequent systemic reactions. One serious adverse event was reported, assessed as unrelated to the vaccine. Conclusions: This study confirms that half doses of ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 are as immunogenic and safe as full doses, and a heterologous booster is more immunogenic than a homologous booster.