A high-definition mapping catheter has been introduced, allowing for bipolar recording along and across the spline with a rapid assessment of voltage, activation, and directionality of conduction. We aimed to evaluate differences in mapping density, accuracy, time, and consequently RF time between different mapping catheters used for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation at our center. Patients were divided into the LiveWire 2-2-2 mm catheter (group A) and the HD Grid SE (group B). Primary endpoints were total RF delivery time, the number of points acquired in sinus rhythm and VT, and the scar area. Fifty-one patients were enrolled, 22 in group A and 29 in group B. More points were acquired in the Grid group in sinus rhythm (SR) and during VT (2060.78 ± 1600.38 vs. 3278.63 ± 3214.45, p = 0.05; 4201.13 ± 5141.61 vs. 10,569.43 ± 13,644.94, p = 0.02, respectively). The scar area was smaller in group B (Bipolar area, cm² 4.52 ± 2.72 vs. 2.89 ± 2.81, p = 0.05. Unipolar area, cm² 7.47 ± 4.55 vs. 5.56 ± 2.79, p = 0.03). Radiofrequency (RF) time was shorter in the Grid group (30.52 ± 13.94 vs. 22.16 ± 11.03, p = 0.014). LPs and LAVAs were eliminated in overall >93% of patients. No differences were found in terms of arrhythmia-free survival at follow-up. In conclusion, the use of a high-definition mapping catheter was associated with significantly shorter mapping time during VT and RF time. Significantly more points were acquired in SR and during VT. During remap, we also observed more LAVAs and LPs requiring further ablation.

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been adopted to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although the role of HPSD is well-established in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), fewer data have assessed the impact of HPSD when addressing extra-pulmonary veins (PVs) targets. Therefore, this study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of HPSD lesion index (LSI)-guided posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to PVI as an initial strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ablation of Pe-AF in our center between August 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients’ ablation strategy was PVI plus PWI using HPSD LSI-guided isolation. RF parameters included 50 W targeting LSI values of ≥5 on the anterior part of the PVs and anterior roofline and ≥4 for the posterior PVs aspect, bottom line, and within the posterior wall (PW). We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PWI. Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and a high-density multipolar Grid-shaped mapping catheter. We compared the procedural characteristics using HPSD (n = 35) vs. a control group (n = 46). Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. PWI on top of PVI was achieved in all cases in the HPSD group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 93.3% of PVs (n = 126/135). First-pass roofline block was obtained in most patients (n = 31, 88.5%), while first-pass block of the bottom line was only achieved in 51.4% (n = 18). There were no significant differences compared to the control group; first-pass PVI was achieved in 94.9% of PVs (n = 169/178), first-pass roofline block in 89.1%, and bottom-line in 45.6% of patients. To achieve complete PWI with HPSD, scattered RF applications within the PW were necessary. No electrical reconnection of the PW was found after adenosine administration and the waiting period. The procedure and RF times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the control group, with values of 116.2 ± 10.9 vs. 144.5 ± 11.3 min, and 19.8 ± 3.6 vs. 26.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively, p < 0.001. Fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No procedural complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 71.4% of patients remained free from AF, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: HPSD LSI-guided PWI on top of PVI seems effective and safe. Compared to a control group, HPSD is associated with similar rates of first-pass PWI and PVI but with a shorter procedural and RF time.

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia associated with stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. Due to its efficacy and safety, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is widely accepted for rhythm control; however, long-term AF recurrence remains a challenge. Continuous monitoring with implantable loop recorders (ILRs) enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI) can detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes, potentially optimizing patient management. This analysis assessed the long-term effectiveness of CBA in maintaining sinus rhythm and investigated the role of ILR-guided monitoring in enhancing therapeutic decisions. Methods: Data from 91 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon ablation at four Italian centers between April 2022 and April 2024 were analyzed. All patients received an insertable loop recorder (ILR) before or during hospitalization for ablation, allowing for the continuous remote monitoring of arrhythmias. Baseline demographics, procedural details, AF occurrence, AF burden (calculated as the total duration of all AF episodes occurring within a day and categorized by episode duration), therapeutic adjustments, and the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on data processing were evaluated. Results: The cohort’s average age was 62.4 years, with 24.2% of participants being female. Physician-confirmed AF recurrence was noted in 26.7% of patients at 12 months and 49.5% at 24 months. The device data indicated a daily AF burden of ≥6 min in 47.2% at 12 months, with 25.9% surpassing 1 h. AI algorithms decreased false-positive alerts by 21%, resulting in an estimated saving of 19 clinician hours. In patients with pre-ablation ILR data, the median AF burden significantly decreased from 7% to 0.2% (p = 0.017). ILR-guided monitoring affected treatment adjustments, leading to the discontinuation of antiarrhythmic therapy in 36 patients and redo ablations in 8. Conclusions: Continuous ILR monitoring, combined with AI-driven analysis, enables the detection of AF recurrences and burden, thereby facilitating timely therapeutic adjustments.

Background: Durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but it has been demonstrated that it may not be enough to treat persistent AF (Pe-AF). Therefore, posterior wall isolation (PWI) is among the strategies adopted on top of PVI to treat Pe-AF patients. However, PWI using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions remains challenging, and few studies have evaluated the impact of the Ablation Index (AI) on the efficacy of PWI. Moreover, previous papers did not evaluate arrhythmia recurrences using continuous monitoring. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, single-center study on patients affected by Pe-AF undergoing treated PVI plus AI-guided PWI. Procedures were performed using the CARTO mapping system, SmartTouch SF ablation catheter, and PentaRay multipolar mapping catheter. The AI settings were 500–550 for the anterior PV aspect and roofline, while the settings were 450–500 for the posterior PV aspect, bottom line, and/or PW lesions. All patients received an implantable loop recorder (ILR). All patients underwent clinical evaluation in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at each visit, and device data from the ILR were reviewed to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Results: Between January 2021 and December 2021, forty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI plus PWI guided by AI at our center and were prospectively enrolled in the study. PVI was achieved in all patients, first-pass roofline block was obtained in 82.9% of the patients, and first-pass block of the bottom line was achieved in 36.5% of the patients. In 39% of the patients, PWI was not performed with a “box-only” lesion set, but with scattered lesions across the PW to achieve PWI. AI on the anterior aspect of the left PVs was 528 ± 22, while on the posterior aspect of the left PVs, it was 474 ± 18; on the anterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 532 ± 27, while on the posterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 477 ± 16; on the PW, AI was 468 ± 19. No acute complications occurred at the end of the procedure. After the blanking period, 70.7% of the patients reported no arrhythmia recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions: In patients with Pe-AF undergoing catheter ablation, PWI guided by AI seems to be an effective and feasible strategy in addition to standard PVI.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common and clinically important complications in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), occurring in up to 50% of cases within the first year after implantation. Despite the hemodynamic support provided by LVADs, VAs are linked to increased morbidity and mortality, primarily through recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and right ventricular failure. The underlying mechanisms of VAs in this population are multifactorial, involving structural myocardial remodeling, device-related factors, and pre-existing arrhythmic substrates. Catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment option when antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device reprogramming are inadequate, though procedural timing (pre-, intra-, or post-implantation) and approaches remain under discussion. Epicardial access during LVAD surgery may provide advantages for selected patients, while ablation after implantation poses technical challenges due to altered anatomy and electromagnetic interference. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of VAs in LVAD recipients, emphasizing technical considerations, procedural safety, and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential in guiding personalized treatment and optimizing outcomes for this complex population. Undergoing studies will provide more insight into optimal management of arrhythmias, particularly regarding the optimal timing of catheter ablation. The impact of new technologies such as non-invasive mapping alongside pre-procedural imaging needs also to be further evaluated.

Cardioneuroablation aims to correct the imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic tone by targeting the cardiac postganglionic vagal fibers. Accurate localization of ganglionated plexi is crucial for the efficacy of the procedure. Omnipolar Technology Near Field is a novel mapping algorithm enabling real‐time, automatic spectral analysis with high spatial resolution and accuracy.