Philipp Schmitz

Dr. Philipp Schmitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2024 in Systems & Control Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
TFTimm Faulwasser
Timm Faulwasser
PRPaolo Rapisarda
Paolo Rapisarda
KWKarl Worthmann
Karl Worthmann

1 September 2023 in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJussi Behrndt
Jussi Behrndt
Friedrich (Fritz) GesztesyFriedrich (Fritz) Gesztesy
Friedrich (Fritz) Gesztesy
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
CTCarsten Trunk
Carsten Trunk
In this note we provide estimates for the lower bound of the self-adjoint operator associated with the three-coefficient Sturm–Liouville differential expression 1 r ( − d d x p d d x + q ) \begin{equation*} \frac {1}{r} \left (-\frac {\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx} p \frac {\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx} + q\right ) \end{equation*} in the weighted L 2 L^2 -Hilbert space L 2 ( R ; r d x ) L^2(\mathbb R; rdx) .

25 October 2016 in Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJussi Behrndt
Jussi Behrndt
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
CTCarsten Trunk
Carsten Trunk

17 April 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAnna Eingartner
Anna Eingartner
SNSteffi Naumann
Steffi Naumann
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
KWKarl Worthmann
Karl Worthmann
In this paper, the application of the method of affinely adjustable robust optimization to a planning model of an energy system under uncertain parameters is presented, and the total scheduling costs in comparison with the deterministic model are evaluated. First, the basics of optimization under uncertain data are recapped, and it is described how these methods can be used in different applications for energy systems. This is followed by the methodology of adjustable robust optimization by defining the affinely adjustable robust counterpart. Finally, a numerical case study is conducted to compare the adjustable robust method with a rolling deterministic scheduling method. Both are implemented on a model of an energy system and compared with each other by simulation using real-world data. By calculating the total operating costs for both methods, it can be concluded that the adjustable robust optimization provides a significantly more cost-effective solution to the scheduling problem.

1 December 2017 in Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJussi Behrndt
Jussi Behrndt
BGBernhard Gsell
Bernhard Gsell
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
CTCarsten Trunk
Carsten Trunk

1 May 2026 in IEEE Control Systems Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAmine Othmane
Amine Othmane
PSPhilipp Schmitz
Philipp Schmitz
KWKarl Worthmann
Karl Worthmann
KFKathrin Flaßkamp
Kathrin Flaßkamp
We derive a numerically stable method to compute an image representation of an unknown linear system only from data, leveraging a continuous-time version of Willems et al.’s fundamental lemma. To this end, we use derivatives approximated by algebraic differentiators. Our novel image representation avoids solving differential-algebraic equations and significantly reduces computational complexity by eliminating redundant degrees of freedom corresponding to the number of unknown quantities to be identified. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach, even in the presence of severe measurement disturbances.