Mahmut Akgul

Dr. Mahmut Akgul

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Human Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMahmut Akgul
Mahmut Akgul
GMGregory T. MacLennan
Gregory T. MacLennan
Liang ChengLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng

24 June 2021 in Journal of Clinical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMahmut Akgul
Mahmut Akgul
KAKhaleel I Al-Obaidy
Khaleel I Al-Obaidy
Liang ChengLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng
MIMuhammad T Idrees
Muhammad T Idrees
Aims Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) has recently been introduced as a potential distinct entity. Methods At the Indiana University department of pathology, primary renal epithelial neoplasms between 2005 and 2020 were searched after appropriate institutional review board permissions. Results Twenty-three cases (male/female ratio 14/9) with a median age of 66 (23–84 years) were identified. The majority of patients underwent partial nephrectomy (15/23, 65%), with a median tumour size of 4.0 cm (2.2–10.5 cm). Only one case had infiltration beyond the kidney (perinephric fat). Solid/diffuse proliferation of tightly packed oncocytic tumour cells and occasional tubule formations, with an abrupt edematous change in the stroma with loosely connected small clusters of tumour cells. Along with diffuse CK7 expression with lack of CD117 in all cases, vimentin was positive in 8/23 cases (35%, 5 focal). CD10 was expressed in 6/13 (46%, 4 focal). Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (AMACR) was positive in 5/8 (63%) cases. Focal but intense cytoplasmic colloidal iron stain was present in 3/20 (15%) cases. Luminal or cytoplasmic/perinuclear precipitation was observed in 8/20 (40%) cases. Succinate Dehydrogenase B (SDHB) was performed in 6 cases, with all retained expression. Conclusions LOT is a clinically indolent and potentially benign entity with distinguishable morphology and immunohistochemical profile that can be performed and be easily interpreted in most of surgical pathology settings. Additional studies with larger cohorts, comprehensive molecular evaluation and longer follow-up are needed to definitively recognise these tumours as a separate entity and to further address the possibility of active surveillance options in eligible patients.

29 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMahmut Akgul
Mahmut Akgul
SWSean R Williamson
Sean R Williamson
DEDilek Ertoy
Dilek Ertoy
PAPedram Argani
Pedram Argani
SGSounak Gupta
Sounak Gupta
MIMuhammad T Idrees
Muhammad T Idrees
Transcription factor E3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) has heterogenous morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features. 131 pathologists with genitourinary expertise were invited in an online survey containing 23 questions assessing their experience on TFE3-RCC diagnostic work-up. Fifty (38%) participants completed the survey. 46 of 50 participants reported multiple patterns, most commonly papillary pattern (almost always 9/46, 19.5%; frequently 29/46, 63%). Large epithelioid cells with abundant cytoplasm were the most encountered cytologic feature, with either clear (almost always 10/50, 20%; frequently 34/50, 68%) or eosinophilic (almost always 4/49, 8%; frequently 28/49, 57%) cytology. Strong (3+) or diffuse (>75% of tumour cells) nuclear TFE3 IHC expression was considered diagnostic by 13/46 (28%) and 12/47 (26%) participants, respectively. Main TFE3 IHC issues were the low specificity (16/42, 38%), unreliable staining performance (15/42, 36%) and background staining (12/42, 29%). Most preferred IHC assays other than TFE3, cathepsin K and pancytokeratin were melan A (44/50, 88%), HMB45 (43/50, 86%), carbonic anhydrase IX (41/50, 82%) and CK7 (32/50, 64%). Cut-off for positive TFE3 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) was preferably 10% (9/50, 18%), although significant variation in cut-off values was present. 23/48 (48%) participants required TFE3 FISH testing to confirm TFE3-RCC regardless of the histomorphologic and IHC assessment. 28/50 (56%) participants would request additional molecular studies other than FISH assay in selected cases, whereas 3/50 participants use additional molecular cases in all cases when TFE3-RCC is in the differential. Optimal diagnostic approach on TFE3-RCC is impacted by IHC and/or FISH assay preferences as well as their conflicting interpretation methods.

13 April 2022 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRose S. George
Rose S. George
AHArkar Htoo
Arkar Htoo
MCMichael Cheng
Michael Cheng
TMTimothy M. Masterson
Timothy M. Masterson
KHKun Huang
Kun Huang
Liang ChengLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng

1 May 2021 in Urology Case Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RGRose George
Rose George
DSDaniel Swerdloff
Daniel Swerdloff
MAMahmut Akgul
Mahmut Akgul
TNTipu Nazeer
Tipu Nazeer
BMBadar M. Mian
Badar M. Mian
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT) of the urachus is a rare neoplastic condition characterized by proliferation of spindle cell, likely derived from myofibroblasts or fibroblasts, with acute and chronic inflammatory infiltrate. Urachal IMT present with abdominal/pelvic pain and urinary symptoms. These often manifest as abdominal mass involving adjacent structures. We describe a case of young female with urachal IMT that was excised with a wide margin to ensure complete removal of all adjacent affected tissue using robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. Immunohistochemical evidence of ALK and ALK gene rearrangement were confirmed in this tumor which are diagnostic of IMT.

1 August 2022 in International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMichel Kmeid
Michel Kmeid
MAMahmut Akgul
Mahmut Akgul
TFE3 rearranged Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not very common, and demonstrates unique heterogenous morphological features overlapping other recognized entities and distinct immunoprofile. It can be seen in any age group, therefore practicing pathologists should be aware of the distinctive clinical settings and histologic findings associated with these tumors and subsequently employ an adequate panel of ancillary studies in order to confirm the diagnosis. Recognizing these entities remains crucial for future clinical trials and development of novel therapies.