Background: Maxillofacial trauma (MFT) caused by falls, interpersonal violence or traffic accidents leading to fractures of different facial regions, including the midface and the mandible, are common clinical conditions requiring open reduction and internal fixation. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and time trends in MFT-associated surgeries regarding different facial regions in the German healthcare system over time. Materials and methods: Nationwide data regarding the national diagnosis-related group (DRG) inpatient billing system was received from the German Federal Statistical Office for the years 2005–2022. We estimated the age–gender standardized incidence of MFT-associated procedures classified by the Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS) and evaluated age- and gender-adjusted time trends using Poisson regression analysis. Results: The total standardized incidence rate of MFT-associated procedures in the observational period 2005–2022 was 25.1 (♀13.3; ♂37.5) per 100,000 person-years within a slight significant annual decrease of 0.5%. A significant increase in the incidence of MFT-related procedures within the observational period was found in older adults from 60 to 79 years (+55.1%; ♀+54.8%; ♂+56.3%) and elderly patients over 80 years (+66.7%; ♀+59.1%; ♂+85.1%). Other significant trends are decreases in MFT-related procedures performed in children from 0–14 years (−28.1%; ♀−30.3%; ♂−27.3%) and young adults between 15 and 35 years (−20.4%; ♀−7.3%; ♂−22.5%). Conclusions: MFT-associated surgery is a persisting challenge in the German healthcare system. There is an ongoing transition in MFT-associated surgeries from younger to older patients beyond the scope of demographic change, highlighting the increasing importance of interdisciplinary treatment of patients with pre-existing conditions in maxillofacial surgery. Implementation of injury prevention measures might be beneficial in this population.
Background: Assessing the morphology of the superior airway space is a crucial diagnostic step in the treatment planning of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or prior to orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the necessary scope of a two-dimensional cephalometric assessment and the necessity of three-dimensional imaging in the identification of superior airway space narrowing (SASN). Methods: The computed tomography studies of 100 non-obese, non-OSAS patients were evaluated and analyzed retrospectively. Multiplanar reconstructions were created and underwent cephalometric evaluation. The three-dimensional superior airway morphology was segmented and measured for the minimal cross-sectional area (Amin) and volume (V0). Patients were grouped according to Amin < 80 mm2 and V0 < 12 cm3. Cephalometric parameters (CPs) were analyzed according to Amin and V0 with an unpaired t-test, Pearson correlation, and ROC-curve analysis. Results: The CPs regarding sagittal airway space dimensions (IPAS, MPAS, SPAS) and mandibular body length (GoGn) show the strongest correlation to the three-dimensional minimal cross-sectional area (Amin). The ROC-curve analysis classifying for SASN led to an AUC of 0.86 for IPAS, 0.87 for MPAS, 0.88 for SPAS, and 0.63 for GoGn. Three-dimensional imaging may further improve the diagnostic accuracy in the identification of SASN for IPAS below 13.5 mm, MPAS below 10.2 mm, SPAS below 12.5 mm, and GoGn below 90.2 mm. Conclusions: Two-dimensional cephalometric sagittal airway space diameters and mandibular body length are useful initial screening parameters in the identification of superior airway space narrowing. Nevertheless, as the correlation of two-dimensional cephalometric parameters with three-dimensional upper airway space narrowing is varying and highly dependent on acquisition circumstances, indications for three-dimensional imaging, if possible, in the supine position to evaluate upper airway space morphology should be provided generously, especially in patients with low but normal airway space parameters in two-dimensional cephalometry.