Conventional rock classification diagrams do not distinguish the variety of peraluminous rock series. Moreover, peraluminous granite types have not been clearly discriminated in recent revisions. The study of several peraluminous series in different intracontinental orogenic belts reveals that four distinct groups can be defined. Using an A-B diagram, these four groups are: (1) highly peraluminous granitoids (hP) characterised by high A values and typified by an increase in peraluminosity toward the most mafic varieties; (2) moderately peraluminous granitoids (mP) which occupy the intermediate field and generally show increasing peraluminosity towards the most felsic varieties; (3) low peraluminous granitoids (IP) which plot in the lowest part of the peraluminous field defining negative slope trends; (4) highly felsic peraluminous granites (fP) with poorly defined variation trends.In intracontinental orogenic belts, the genesis of peraluminous granitic series is favoured by the abundance of fertile crustal protoliths, mainly metapelites, metaigneous rocks and metagreywackes. The difficulty of attaining temperatures in excess of 950°C at lower crustal levels during the tectonothermal evolution of thickened crust, inhibits the partial melting of more basic sources. Although the physical parameters of the melting process influence their chemical and mineralogical characteristics, source rock composition ultimately determines the degree of peraluminosity of the granitic series.
In less than two decades, UASs (unmanned aerial systems) have revolutionized the field of hydrology, bridging the gap between traditional satellite observations and ground-based measurements and allowing the limitations of manned aircraft to be overcome. With unparalleled spatial and temporal resolutions and product-tailoring possibilities, UAS are contributing to the acquisition of large volumes of data on water bodies, submerged parameters and their interactions in different hydrological contexts and in inaccessible or hazardous locations. This paper provides a comprehensive review of 122 works on the applications of UASs in surface water and groundwater research with a purpose-oriented approach. Concretely, the review addresses: (i) the current applications of UAS in surface and groundwater studies, (ii) the type of platforms and sensors mainly used in these tasks, (iii) types of products generated from UAS-borne data, (iv) the associated advantages and limitations, and (v) knowledge gaps and future prospects of UASs application in hydrology. The first aim of this review is to serve as a reference or introductory document for all researchers and water managers who are interested in embracing this novel technology. The second aim is to unify in a single document all the possibilities, potential approaches and results obtained by different authors through the implementation of UASs.