Kori Leblanc

Dr. Kori Leblanc

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

17 February 2016 in JMIR Human Factors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KTKim Tran
Kim Tran
KLKori Leblanc
Kori Leblanc
AVAlissia Valentinis
Alissia Valentinis
DKDoug Kavanagh
Doug Kavanagh
NZNina Zahr
Nina Zahr
NINoah M Ivers
Noah M Ivers
JMIR Human Factors - a leading peer-reviewed ehealth journal

1 January 2024 in Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YMYuki Meng
Yuki Meng
CCChristopher Chiu
Christopher Chiu
MKMamta Kapoor
Mamta Kapoor
SLShelly-Anne Li
Shelly-Anne Li
NKNavaldeep Kaur
Navaldeep Kaur
CPChristine Papoushek
Christine Papoushek
Background: Depression affects approximately 280 million individuals globally and it is a leading cause of disability. Despite effective medication options, 50% of patients prematurely discontinue antidepressants within 6 months. We sought to understand patients’ perspectives regarding their needs and expectations related to antidepressants. Objectives: To identify and describe enablers and barriers that influence adult patients’ medication adherence in depression treatment and to explore patients’ educational needs on initiating or continuing antidepressant therapy. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study was conducted using individual, semi-structured interviews of adult patients with depression who were prescribed an antidepressant within 3 months of study recruitment at an urban primary care clinic in Toronto, Canada. Thirteen participants were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for inductive thematic analysis. Results: Six themes emerged: safety and effectiveness of antidepressant, understanding of depression and its management, medication administration, healthcare experiences in the treatment of depression, and social influences and relationships. Barriers to adherence included adverse effects of antidepressants, preference for non-pharmacological therapies, uncertainty about therapeutic effects, and social stigma. In contrast, enablers were positive responses from antidepressants, fear of relapse, reminder aids, established routine, and a trusting patient-provider relationship. Participants desired access to reliable, evidence-based, and personalized educational information delivered through verbal, written, and digital formats to support antidepressant adherence. Conclusion: To overcome the identified barriers, educational strategies should involve both patients and their prescribers to identify patient-specific needs and treatment goals, engage in shared decision-making, and maintain consistent follow-up to support antidepressant adherence.

29 September 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKori Leblanc
Kori Leblanc
SEScott Edwards
Scott Edwards
George DranitsarisGeorge Dranitsaris
George Dranitsaris
DLDarryl P. Leong
Darryl P. Leong
MCMarc Carrier
Marc Carrier
Urban EmmeneggerUrban Emmenegger
Urban Emmenegger
Background/Objectives: Abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide, which make up the androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs) drug class, are commonly used in the management of prostate cancer. Many patients on ARATs also receive oral antithrombotic therapy (i.e., anticoagulants or antiplatelets). The concomitant use of ARATs and antithrombotic therapies creates the potential for clinically relevant drug–drug interactions, but the literature regarding the actual consequences of these interactions, and guidance for co-prescribing, is limited. We assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts and provided them with clinical information derived from a comprehensive literature review regarding the drug–drug interactions between ARATs and antithrombotic therapies. Methods: A three-stage modified electronic Delphi process was used to gather and consolidate opinions from the panel. Each stage consisted of up to three rounds of voting to achieve consensus on which ARAT/antithrombotic therapy drug pairs warrant attention, the possible clinical consequences of drug–drug interactions, and suggested actions for management. Results: The panel achieved consensus to avoid 11 ARAT/antithrombotic therapy drug pairs and modify therapy for eight pairs. Assessments relied heavily on pharmacokinetic data and extrapolation from drug–drug interaction studies of similarly metabolized drugs. Conclusions: This e-Delphi process highlights the need for further research into the clinical impact of ARAT/antithrombotic drug interactions. Nonetheless, the suggested actions aim to provide clinicians with a practical framework for therapeutic decision making.

29 July 2020 in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKori Leblanc
Kori Leblanc
ABAlan D. Bell
Alan D. Bell
JEJustin A. Ezekowitz
Justin A. Ezekowitz
MTMary K. Tan
Mary K. Tan
DLDavid Laflamme
David Laflamme
FIfor the OPTIMAL AF Investigators
for the OPTIMAL AF Investigators

9 February 2018 in Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKori Leblanc
Kori Leblanc
WSWilliam M. Semchuk
William M. Semchuk
JPJohn Papastergiou
John Papastergiou
BSBlair Snow
Blair Snow
LMLeilany Mandlsohn
Leilany Mandlsohn
DGDavid J. Gladstone
David J. Gladstone