William Woodgate

Dr. William Woodgate


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 July 2020 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGilberto Pastorello
Gilberto Pastorello
CTCarlo Trotta
Carlo Trotta
ECEleonora Canfora
Eleonora Canfora
HCHousen Chu
Housen Chu
DCDanielle Christianson
Danielle Christianson
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
The FLUXNET2015 dataset provides ecosystem-scale data on CO2, water, and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere, and other meteorological and biological measurements, from 212 sites around the globe (over 1500 site-years, up to and including year 2014). These sites, independently managed and operated, voluntarily contributed their data to create global datasets. Data were quality controlled and processed using uniform methods, to improve consistency and intercomparability across sites. The dataset is already being used in a number of applications, including ecophysiology studies, remote sensing studies, and development of ecosystem and Earth system models. FLUXNET2015 includes derived-data products, such as gap-filled time series, ecosystem respiration and photosynthetic uptake estimates, estimation of uncertainties, and metadata about the measurements, presented for the first time in this paper. In addition, 206 of these sites are for the first time distributed under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license. This paper details this enhanced dataset and the processing methods, now made available as open-source codes, making the dataset more accessible, transparent, and reproducible.

27 July 2018 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VHVanessa Haverd
Vanessa Haverd
BSBenjamin Smith
Benjamin Smith
LNLars Nieradzik
Lars Nieradzik
PBPeter R. Briggs
Peter R. Briggs
WWWilliam Woodgate
William Woodgate
MCMatthias Cuntz
Matthias Cuntz
The Community Atmosphere–Biosphere Land Exchange model (CABLE) is a land surface model (LSM) that can be applied stand-alone and provides the land surface–atmosphere exchange within the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS). We describe new developments that extend the applicability of CABLE for regional and global carbon–climate simulations, accounting for vegetation responses to biophysical and anthropogenic forcings. A land use and land cover change module driven by gross land use transitions and wood harvest area was implemented, tailored to the needs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6). Novel aspects include the treatment of secondary woody vegetation, which benefits from a tight coupling between the land use module and the Population Orders Physiology (POP) module for woody demography and disturbance-mediated landscape heterogeneity. Land use transitions and harvest associated with secondary forest tiles modify the annually resolved patch age distribution within secondary vegetated tiles, in turn affecting biomass accumulation and turnover rates and hence the magnitude of the secondary forest sink. Additionally, we implemented a novel approach to constrain modelled GPP consistent with the coordination hypothesis and predicted by evolutionary theory, which suggests that electron-transport- and Rubisco-limited rates adjust seasonally and across biomes to be co-limiting. We show that the default prior assumption – common to CABLE and other LSMs – of a fixed ratio of electron transport to carboxylation capacity at standard temperature (Jmax,0∕Vcmax,0) is at odds with this hypothesis; we implement an alternative algorithm for dynamic optimisation of this ratio such that coordination is achieved as an outcome of fitness maximisation. The results have significant implications for the magnitude of the simulated CO2 fertilisation effect on photosynthesis in comparison to alternative estimates and observational proxies. These new developments enhance CABLE's capability for use within an Earth system model and in stand-alone applications to attribute trends and variability in the terrestrial carbon cycle to regions, processes and drivers. Model evaluation shows that the new model version satisfies several key observational constraints: (i) trend and interannual variations in the global land carbon sink, including sensitivities of interannual variations to global precipitation and temperature anomalies; (ii) centennial trends in global GPP; (iii) coordination of Rubisco-limited and electron-transport-limited photosynthesis; (iv) spatial distributions of global ET, GPP, biomass and soil carbon; and (v) age-dependent rates of biomass accumulation in boreal, temperate and tropical secondary forests. CABLE simulations agree with recent independent assessments of the global land–atmosphere flux partition that use a combination of atmospheric inversions and bottom-up constraints. In particular, there is agreement that the strong CO2-driven sink in the tropics is largely cancelled by net deforestation and forest degradation emissions, leaving the Northern Hemisphere (NH) extratropics as the dominant contributor to the net land sink.

4 February 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VHVanessa Haverd
Vanessa Haverd
BSBenjamin Smith
Benjamin Smith
JCJosep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell
MCMatthias Cuntz
Matthias Cuntz
SMSara Mikaloff‐Fletcher
Sara Mikaloff‐Fletcher
CTCathy M. Trudinger
Cathy M. Trudinger
Several lines of evidence point to an increase in the activity of the terrestrial biosphere over recent decades, impacting the global net land carbon sink (NLS) and its control on the growth of atmospheric carbon dioxide (ca). Global terrestrial gross primary production (GPP)—the rate of carbon fixation by photosynthesis—is estimated to have risen by (31 ± 5)% since 1900, but the relative contributions of different putative drivers to this increase are not well known. Here we identify the rising atmospheric CO2 concentration as the dominant driver. We reconcile leaf‐level and global atmospheric constraints on trends in modeled biospheric activity to reveal a global CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis of 30% since 1900, or 47% for a doubling of ca above the pre‐industrial level. Our historic value is nearly twice as high as current estimates (17 ± 4)% that do not use the full range of available constraints. Consequently, under a future low‐emission scenario, we project a land carbon sink (174 PgC, 2006–2099) that is 57 PgC larger than if a lower CO2 fertilization effect comparable with current estimates is assumed. These findings suggest a larger beneficial role of the land carbon sink in modulating future excess anthropogenic CO2 consistent with the target of the Paris Agreement to stay below 2°C warming, and underscore the importance of preserving terrestrial carbon sinks.

5 January 2019 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMatheus Vicari
Matheus Vicari
MDMathias Disney
Mathias Disney
PWPhil Wilkes
Phil Wilkes
ABAndrew Burt
Andrew Burt
KCKim Calders
Kim Calders
WWWilliam Woodgate
William Woodgate
Leaf and wood separation is a key step to allow a new range of estimates from Terrestrial LiDAR data, such as quantifying above‐ground biomass, leaf and wood area and their 3D spatial distributions. We present a new method to separate leaf and wood from single tree point clouds automatically. Our approach combines unsupervised classification of geometric features and shortest path analysis. The automated separation algorithm and its intermediate steps are presented and validated. Validation consisted of using a testing framework with synthetic point clouds, simulated using ray‐tracing and 3D tree models and 10 field scanned tree point clouds. To evaluate results we calculated accuracy, kappa coefficient and F‐score. Validation using simulated data resulted in an overall accuracy of 0.83, ranging from 0.71 to 0.94. Per tree average accuracy from synthetic data ranged from 0.77 to 0.89. Field data results presented and overall average accuracy of 0.89. Analysis of each step showed accuracy ranging from 0.75 to 0.98. F‐scores from both simulated and field data were similar, with scores from leaf usually higher than for wood. Our separation method showed results similar to others in literature, albeit from a completely automated workflow. Analysis of each separation step suggests that the addition of path analysis improved the robustness of our algorithm. Accuracy can be improved with per tree parameter optimization. The library containing our separation script can be easily installed and applied to single tree point cloud. Average processing times are below 10 min for each tree.

25 February 2021 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGilberto Pastorello
Gilberto Pastorello
CTCarlo Trotta
Carlo Trotta
ECEleonora Canfora
Eleonora Canfora
HCHousen Chu
Housen Chu
DCDanielle Christianson
Danielle Christianson
DPDario Papale
Dario Papale
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00851-9.

1 June 2015 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWilliam Woodgate
William Woodgate
SJSimon D. Jones
Simon D. Jones
LSLola Suarez
Lola Suarez
MHMichael Hill
Michael Hill
JAJohn Armston
John Armston
AMAndrew Mellor
Andrew Mellor