This retrospective study examines the outcomes of sclerotherapy in children with (veno)lymphatic malformations who received sclerotherapy between 2011 and 2016 (116 children, 234 procedures). Complication severity was classified using the Society of Interventional Radiology classification. Clinical response was rated on a scale of 0 (no change) to 3 (good improvement). The sclerosants used were bleomycin (n = 132; 56%), lauromacrogol (n = 42; 18%), doxycycline (n = 15; 6%), ethanol (n = 12; 5%), or a combination (n = 33; 14%). Four major and 25 minor complications occurred without significant differences between the agents. The median response rate per procedure was 2—some improvement—for all sclerosants. However, in pure LMs (67%), bleomycin and a combination of agents resulted in the best clinical response. On patient level, all had some or good clinical response. Mixed macrocystic and microcystic lesions showed a significantly lower clinical response (median 2 versus 3; p = 0.023 and p = 0.036, respectively) and required significantly more procedures (median 2 versus 1; p = 0.043 and p = 0.044, respectively) compared with lesions with one component.Conclusion: Sclerotherapy for (V)LMs in children is safe and effective. Bleomycin is the most frequently used agent in this clinic and seemed most effective for pure LMs. Mixed macrocystic and microcystic lesions are most difficult to treat effectively. What is Known:• A variety of agents can be used for sclerotherapy of lymphatic malformations in children.• Macrocystic lesions have favorable outcomes compared with microcystic and mixed lesions. What is New:• Bleomycin and a combination of agents seem to be most effective to treat lymphatic malformations in children.• Mixed macrocystic and microcystic lesions are more difficult to treat effectively compared with lesions with either one of these components.

Congenital vascular malformations (CVMs) are the result of an aberrant development during embryogenesis. Although these lesions are present at birth, they are not always visible yet. Once symptomatic, patients suffer from pain, bleeding, ulcers, infections or lymphatic leakage, depending on the subtype of vessels involved. Treatment includes conservative management, surgery, sclerotherapy, embolization and pharmacological therapy. The clinical presentation varies widely and treatment can be challenging due to the rarity of the disease and potential difficulties of treatment. This review gives an overview of the historical developments in diagnosis and classification and exposes the key elements of innovations in the past decades on the identification of genetic mutations and personalized treatment. These advances in the field and a multidisciplinary approach are highly valuable in the optimization of clinical care aimed at both curing or stabilizing the CVM and pursuing physical and psychosocial wellbeing.

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suturing demands advanced surgical skills. Therefore, it is important these skills are adequately trained and assessed. Assessment and feedback can consist of judgments and scores of expert observers or objective parameters using instrument tracking. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent objective parameters correspond to expert assessment. Methods: Participants performed an intracorporeal suturing task on the EoSim simulator repeatedly (maximum 20 repetitions) during training. The best discriminating parameters, which previously shown construct validation, were combined into a composite score, using regression analysis. All videos were blinded and assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the validated laparoscopic suturing competency assessment tool (LS-CAT). These scores were compared with the composite score. Results: A 100 videos of 16 trainees, during separate points on their learning curve, and 8 experts were used. The parameters “time” and “distance” were statistically significantly correlated with all LS-CAT domains. The composite score (calculated from “time” and “distance”) showed improvement between the first and the last knot (57% versus 94%, P < .001). Also the LS-CAT score improved (28 versus 17, P < .001). However, the correlation of the composite score with the LS-CAT score was weak ( R : 0.351), with an accuracy of 55/100 when pooling the outcomes based on inadequate, adequate, or good performance. Conclusion: Instrument tracking parameters (using Surgtrac) could give an indication of the skill level, however, it missed important elements, essential for reliable assessment. Therefore, expert assessment remains superior to determine the skill level in MIS suturing skills.

Introduction: Acquiring and retaining minimally invasive surgery (MIS) skills may be aided by using MIS take-home box simulators. This study aims to evaluate the use of a take-home MIS box trainer for training sessions at-home. Methods: Trainees who previously bought the LaparoscopyBoxx (between 2016 and 2020) were asked to complete an online questionnaire. The first part was on their demographic data, and the second part was on their use and opinion on the box trainer (on a 5-point Likert scale). Results: A total of 39 participants (9 surgeons and 30 trainees) completed the questionnaire (response rate 40%). Overall, participants had a positive opinion on the use of the box trainer and would recommend it to others for training (mean 4.2). Basic tasks, such as needle trail and ring transfer, were practiced most often and were regarded most relevant (mean 4.1–4.3). They regarded practicing on the stimulator of added value to practicing in the clinic (mean 4.2), were more confident during clinical procedures (mean 3.9), and felt that their skills had improved (mean 4.1). Of quarter of the participants who bought the MIS box trainer during the COVID-19 pandemic reported an increased use during times of less clinical exposure. Conclusion: Surgeons and trainees have a positive opinion on using a take-home MIS box trainer for at-home training for general as well as for pediatric MIS skills. Especially during periods of less exposure in the clinical setting and less hands-on courses, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, at-home training may be a valuable addition.

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the parameters 'time' and 'distance', measured by SurgTrac, correlate with the assessment of the same skills by blinded experts. Methods: Basic open suturing tasks were executed by medical students. SurgTrac software measured objective parameters by tracking fingers. The executed tasks were recorded by a tablet and additionally assessed by a blinded expert with a Competency Assessment Tool-form (CAT-form). A Pearson's correlation was used to investigate the correlation between the parameters and the outcomes of the expert assessment. Results: A strong correlation between the measured parameters of SurgTrac and the expert-assessment was found for knot tying by hand (r =-0.703) and vertical mattress suture (r =-0.644) and a moderate correlation for transcutaneous suture (r =-0.555) and intracutaneous suture (r =-0.451). Conclusion: The use of finger tracking by SurgTrac showed a good concurrent validity for the basic open suturing tasks knot tying by hand, transcutaneous suture and vertical mattress suture.