Background Since 2015, Dutch guidelines have recommended BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant testing for all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Recently, recommendations shifted from germline testing to the tumor-first approach, in which tumor tissue is tested first, and subsequent germline testing is performed only in those with BRCA1/2 tumor pathogenic variants or a positive family history. Data on testing rates and on characteristics of patients missing out on testing remain scarce. Objective To evaluate BRCA1/2 testing rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and compare testing rates of germline testing (performed from 2015 until mid-2018) versus tumor-first testing (implemented mid-2018). Methods A consecutive series of 250 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 2016 and 2019 was included from the OncoLifeS data-biobank of the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. Testing rates were analyzed for the overall study population and for germline testing (period I) and tumor-first testing (period II) separately. Characteristics of tested and untested patients were compared and predictors for receiving testing were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Results Median age was 67.0 years (IQR 59.0–73.0) and 173 (69.2%) patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma. Overall, 201 (80.4%) patients were tested. In period I, 137/171 (80.1%) patients were tested and in period II this was 64/79 (81.0%). Patients with non-high-grade serous carcinoma were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (OR=0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.46, p<0.001). Conclusions The results show that BRCA1/2 testing rates are suboptimal and suggest that clinicians may not be choosing to test patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, although guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 testing in all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Suboptimal testing rates limit optimization of care for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and counseling of potentially affected relatives.

Analyzing BRCA1/2 tumor pathogenic variants (TPVs) in epithelial tubal/ovarian cancers (EOCs) has become an essential part of the diagnostic workflow in many centers to guide treatment options and genetic cascade testing. However, there is no standardization of testing procedures, including techniques, gene assays, or sequencers used, and data on the execution of tumor tests remains scarce. Therefore, we evaluated characteristics of BRCA1/2 tumor testing in advanced-stage EOC with real-world national data. Pathology reports of patients diagnosed with EOC in 2019 in the Netherlands were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), and data regarding histological subtype and BRCA1/2 tumor tests were extracted. A total of 999 patients with advanced-stage EOC were included. Tumor tests were performed for 502 patients (50.2%) and BRCA1/2 TPVs were detected in 14.7%. Of all tests, 48.6% used hybrid capture techniques and 26.5% used PCR-based techniques. More than half of the tests (55.0%) analyzed other genes in addition to BRCA1/2. Overall, this study highlights the heterogeneity in the execution of BRCA1/2 tumor tests. Despite a lack of evidence of quality differences, we emphasize that adequate reporting and internal and external quality monitors are essential for the high-quality implementation and execution of reliable BRCA1/2 tumor testing, which is crucial for identifying all patients with BRCA1/2 TPVs.

Identification of somatic and germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients is essential for determining poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor sensitivity and genetic predisposition. In the Netherlands, BRCA1/2 testing changed to a tumor-first approach to efficiently identify both somatic and germline pathogenic variants in all patients. Here, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the first four years of the tumor-first test-pathway. Data of consecutive series of patients diagnosed with EOC in two regions were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Tumor and/or germline test data were retrieved from hospital databases. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients completing the BRCA1/2 test-pathway, defined as having a negative tumor test or a referral for a germline test in case of a positive tumor test or no tumor test. Factors associated with test-pathway completion were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis. In total, 69.8% (757/1085) completed the test-pathway. This was 74.4% in the most recent year. Younger patients, patients diagnosed in year three or four, patients with high-grade serous/high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, advanced stage disease, middle or high socioeconomic status, and patients who underwent surgery or chemotherapy, were more likely to complete the test-pathway. We report inequalities in genetic testing access in EOC patients, which highlight the need for better guideline adherence, particularly in older patients, those with low socioeconomic status, low-grade histotypes, early-stage disease and those without surgery or chemotherapy. Additionally, timely testing of patients, and testing relatives if patients cannot be tested, are crucial to increase test uptake.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of lithium disilicate cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) on oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction, and esthetic outcomes in patients with a missing maxillary incisor. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study prostheses were placed in patients with a missing maxillary incisor. Gingival grafts were performed for localized alveolar ridge defects. OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and pink and white esthetics (PES/WES) were assessed pre‐treatment (T0), 1 week post‐treatment (T1), and most recent follow‐up (T2). PES were stratified by graft status. Subgroup analyses were performed, including RBFDP configuration. Three observers assessed esthetics independently, and interobserver reliability was calculated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ( α = 0.05). Changes in OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and esthetics across the three time points were analyzed using the Friedman's test ( α = 0.05) with post hoc pairwise comparisons conducted using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests ( α = 0.0167). Results: Thirty‐five patients were followed for a mean of 43 months. Median OHRQoL scores decreased from 30.0 to 16.0, with greatest improvements in psychological well‐being. Patient satisfaction increased from 1.0 to 5.0 on a 0–5 scale. PES/WES improved from 3.3 to 15.7 on a 0–20 scale, with white esthetics showing the largest gains. Gingival grafts further improved PES. When stratified by RBFDP configuration, OHRQoL scores were lowest for the contact‐point design. Interobserver reliability was moderate to good. Conclusions: Lithium disilicate cantilever RBFDPs significantly improved OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and objectively determined esthetics, with stable effects over time.

Background/Objectives: Germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D increase breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Limited data on clinicopathological characteristics of BC and OC in women with these GPVs hamper guideline development. Therefore, this study aims to describe these characteristics in a consecutive series of female PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D GPV carriers. Methods: Women with a PALB2, RAD51C, or RAD51D GPV determined before July 2023 at the University Medical Center Groningen were included. Cancer diagnoses were obtained through linkage with the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Median onset age and histopathological subtypes were compared to the data of The Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Results: Among 164 GPV carriers (125 PALB2, 30 RAD51C, and 9 RAD51D), 54 BC and 6 OC cases were identified. The median BC onset age was 52 (n = 50), 71 (n = 3), and 43 years (n = 1) for PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D, respectively, compared with 62 years in the NCR. No BC histological subtype differences were observed in PALB2 carriers. The populations of RAD51C and RAD51D carriers were too small to compare to NCR data. No OC cases occurred in PALB2 carriers. The median OC onset age was 66 (n = 4) and 56 years (n = 2) for RAD51C and RAD51D carriers, respectively, versus 67 years in the NCR. All RAD51D carriers had high-grade serous carcinoma, compared to 51.5% in the NCR. Conclusions: Differences in onset age and histological subtypes were observed between GPV carriers and national data. Further research on cancer characteristics is needed to optimize counseling and cancer prevention in these women.

Analyzing BRCA1/2 tumor pathogenic variants (TPVs) in epithelial tubal/ovarian cancers (EOC) has become an essential part of the diagnostic workflow in many centers to guide treatment options and genetic cascade testing. However, there is no standardization of testing procedures, including techniques, gene assays, or sequencers used, and data on the execution of tumor tests remains scarce. Therefore, we evaluated characteristics of BRCA1/2 tumor testing in advanced-stage EOC with real-world national data. Pathology reports of patients diagnosed with EOC in 2019 in the Netherlands were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), and data regarding histological subtype and BRCA1/2 tumor tests were extracted. A total of 999 patients with advanced-stage EOC were included. Tumor tests were performed for 502 patients (50.2%) and BRCA1/2 TPVs were detected in 14.7%. Of all tests, 48.6% used hybrid capture techniques and 26.5% used PCR-based techniques. More than half of the tests (55.0%) analyzed other genes in addition to BRCA1/2. Overall, this study highlights the heterogeneity in the execution of BRCA1/2 tumor tests. Despite a lack of evidence of quality differences, we emphasize that adequate reporting and internal and external quality monitors are essential for high-quality implementation and execution of reliable BRCA1/2 tumor testing, which is crucial for identifying all patients with BRCA1/2 TPVs.