Rationale: Normal mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) is 14.0 ± 3.3 mm Hg (mean ± SD). The prognostic relevance of mildly elevated mPAP not fulfilling the definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH; mPAP ≥ 25 mm Hg) has not been prospectively evaluated in a real-world setting. Objectives: To assess the association of resting mPAP with all-cause mortality in a retrospective and a prospective cohort of patients with unexplained dyspnea and/or at risk of PH. Methods: Prognostic cutoffs were calculated by means of 1) classification and regression tree (CART) analysis without any preset thresholds, and 2) preset thresholds on the basis of literature data defining mPAP as lower-normal (≤mean + 1 SD), upper-normal (between mean + 1 SD and mean + 2 SD), borderline (between mean + 2 SD and 25 mm Hg), and manifest PH (≥25 mm Hg). We performed univariate and multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and comorbidities. Measurements and Main Results: We enrolled 547 patients, of whom 137, 56, 64, and 290 presented with lower-normal, upper-normal, or borderline mPAP, and manifest PH, respectively. The CART analysis on mPAP discriminated three prognostic groups: mPAP less than 17 mm Hg, 17 to 26 mm Hg, and greater than 26 mm Hg, with significantly decreasing survival. The univariate analysis on the basis of preset thresholds showed that upper-normal mPAP, borderline mPAP, and manifest PH were significantly associated with poor survival compared with lower-normal mPAP. In the multivariate model, considering age and comorbidities, only borderline mPAP (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–4.97; P = 0.022) and manifest PH (hazard ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.79–9.12; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with poor survival. Conclusions: In patients at risk for PH and/or with unexplained dyspnea, CART analysis detects prognostic thresholds at a resting mPAP of 17 mm Hg and 26 mm Hg, and values between 20 mm Hg and 25 mm Hg represent an independent predictor of poor survival. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01607502).

The accuracy of pulmonary vascular pressure measurements is of great diagnostic and prognostic relevance. However, there is variability of zero leveling procedures, and the current recommendation of end-expiratory reading may not always be adequate. A review of physiological and anatomical data, supported by recent imaging, leads to the practical recommendation of zero leveling at the cross-section of three transthoracic planes, which are, respectively midchest frontal, transverse through the fourth intercostal space, and midsagittal. As for the inevitable respiratory pressure swings, end-expiratory reading at functional residual capacity allows for minimal influence of elastic lung recoil on pulmonary pressure reading. However, hyperventilation is associated with changes in end-expiratory lung volume and increased intrathoracic pressure, eventually exacerbated by expiratory muscle contraction and dynamic hyperinflation, all increasing pulmonary vascular pressures. This problem is amplified in patients with obstructed airways. With the exception of dynamic hyperinflation states, it is reasonable to assume that negative inspiratory and positive expiratory intrathoracic pressures cancel each other out, so averaging pulmonary vascular pressures over several respiratory cycles is most often preferable. This recommendation may be generalized for the purpose of consistency and makes sense, as pulmonary blood flow measurements are not corrected for phasic inspiratory and expiratory changes in clinical practice.

Background: The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is an echocardiographic measurement to assess right ventricular systolic function in adults and children. Objective: We determined growth- and birth weight-related changes of TAPSE to establish reference values in preterm and term neonates. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a group of 258 preterm and term neonates (age: 25+0 to 40+6 weeks of gestation, birth weight: 530–4,200 g). Results: The TAPSE ranged from a mean of 0.44 cm (Z-score ±2: 0.30–0.59 cm) in preterm neonates in the 26th week of gestation to 1.03 cm (Z-score ±2: 0.85–1.21 cm) in term neonates in the 41st week of gestation. The TAPSE values increased in a linear way from the 26th to 41st week of gestation. TAPSE, week of gestation and weight are strongly correlated: Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.93 for week of gestation – TAPSE (p < 0.001), 0.93 for week of gestation – birth weight (p < 0.001), and 0.89 for birth weight – TAPSE (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference of normal TAPSE values between female and male patients (p = 0.987). Conclusion: Z-scores of TAPSE values were calculated and percentile charts were established to serve as reference data for ready application in preterm and term neonates with structurally normal hearts and with congenital heart disease in the future.

Although in the pulmonary circulation small pressure differences may alter the categorisation of patients, there is no consensus on a standard zero reference level (ZRL). In the supine position, ZRL is mostly set at “5 cm below anterior thorax surface”, “1/3 thoracic diameter below anterior thorax surface”, “mid-thoracic level” or “10 cm above table level”.We retrospectively assessed the distance of these four ZRLs from computed tomography-derived right and left atrial centre levels and from one another in patients undergoing right heart catheterisation and calculated the respective differences in pressure readings.We included 196 consecutive patients. The ZRL at “1/3 thoracic diameter” was most often (98.5%) level with the right atrium, and the ZRL at “mid-thoracic level” was level with the left atrium (97.4%), revealing a median (range) pressure difference of -0.3 (-3.0–1.3) and 0.2 (-2.0–1.3) mmHg from the right and left atrial centre level, respectively. The largest differences (8.0 (2.0–15.4) mmHg) were found between the ZRLs “5 cm below anterior thorax surface” and “10 cm above table level”. Accordingly, 59%versus80% of patients would be classified with pulmonary hypertension and 7%versus38% with elevated left heart pressures.The choice of ZRL strongly influences pulmonary pressure readings and pulmonary hypertension classification. 1/3 thoracic diameter mostly represents the right atrium while the left atrium is best represented by the mid-thoracic level.