Bruno de Melo Tavares

Dr. Bruno de Melo Tavares

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2023 in Clinics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MFMaristela p freire
Maristela p freire
BABrandão Assis
Brandão Assis
BTBruno de Melo Tavares
Bruno de Melo Tavares
VBValquiria O.C. Brito
Valquiria O.C. Brito
IMIgor Marinho
Igor Marinho
ALAnna S. Levin
Anna S. Levin
Background: This study aimed to analyze the Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) rates and antimicrobial consumption in Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Sao Paulo city during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them with the pre-pandemic period. Methods: This cohort included all hospitals that reported HAI rates (Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection CLABSI and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia - VAP), the proportion of microorganisms that caused CLABSI, the proportion of resistant microorganisms, and antimicrobial consumption from January 2017 - December 2020. Hospitals were stratified by the number of beds, Central Venous Catheter (CVC) utilization rate, Mechanical-Ventilation (MV) utilization rate, and type of funding. Statistical analyses were based on time-series plots and regression models. Results: 220 ICUs were included. The authors observed an abrupt increase in CLABSI rates after the pandemic onset. High CLABSI rates during the pandemic were associated with hospital size, funding (public and non-profit private), and low CVC use (<= 50%). An increase in VAP rates was associated with public hospitals, and high MV use (> 35%). The susceptibility profile of microorganisms did not differ from that of the pre-pandemic period. polymyxin, glycopeptides, and antifungal use increased, especially in COVID-19 ICUs. Conclusions: HAI increased during COVID-19. The microorganisms' susceptibility profile did not change with the pandemic, but the authors observed a disproportionate increase in large-spectrum antimicrobial drug use.

1 July 2023 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTwisha S Patel
Twisha S Patel
OMOlivia L McGovern
Olivia L McGovern
GMGarrett Mahon
Garrett Mahon
HOHanako Osuka
Hanako Osuka
ÍBÍcaro Boszczowski
Ícaro Boszczowski
FLFernanda C Lessa
Fernanda C Lessa
High rates of antibiotic use (AU) among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite low rates of bacterial coinfection and secondary infection have been reported. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AU in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in South America. We conducted an ecologic evaluation of AU in inpatient adult acute care wards in 2 HCFs each in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. The AU rates for intravenous antibiotics were calculated as the defined daily dose per 1000 patient-days, using pharmacy dispensing records and hospitalization data from March 2018–February 2020 (prepandemic) and March 2020–February 2021 (pandemic). Differences in median AU were compared between the prepandemic and pandemic periods, using the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine significance. Interrupted time series analysis was used to analyze changes in AU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with the prepandemic period, the median difference in AU rates for all antibiotics combined increased in 4 of 6 HCFs (percentage change, 6.7%–35.1%; P < .05). In the interrupted time series models, 5 of 6 HCFs had significant increases in use of all antibiotics combined immediately at the onset of the pandemic (immediate effect estimate range, 15.4–268), but only 1 of these 5 HCFs experienced a sustained increase over time (change in slope, +8.13; P < .01). The effect of the pandemic onset varied by antibiotic group and HCF. Substantial increases in AU were observed at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the need to maintain or strengthen antibiotic stewardship activities as part of pandemic or emergency HCF responses.

1 February 2019 in Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBruno de Melo Tavares
Bruno de Melo Tavares
PFPaula Fcbc Fernandes
Paula Fcbc Fernandes
COCláudia Maria C. Oliveira
Cláudia Maria C. Oliveira
SSSônia L. Silva
Sônia L. Silva
MMMárcia U. Mota
Márcia U. Mota
EGEvelyne S. Girão
Evelyne S. Girão
Background: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection is an acute febrile illness with polyarthralgia and arthritis. There are few data about CHIKV infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). We report the largest case series of CHIKV infection in this population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 32 cases of CHIKV infection in KTR between January 2016 and December 2017 at Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio of Federal University of Ceará. Results: All patients had been in endemic areas before the beginning of the symptoms. All presented arthralgia, 15 (46.9%) with joint inflammatory symptoms and 14 (43.8%) evolved to chronic arthralgia. Seven (21.9%) showed acute kidney injury (AKI) by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria during the acute phase. Acute kidney injury was not related to prednisone use (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-2.61, P = 0.3) nor chronic arthralgia (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.2-8.4, P = 0.8) as well as male sex, chronic kidney disease and older than 60 years (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.3-10.3, P = 0.58; OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-2.7, P = 0.4; and OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.3-14.9, P = 0.45, respectively). Hospitalization was associated to AKI (OR, 44.0; 95% CI, 3.8-503.1; P = 0.002), probably due to diarrhea or dehydration. One patient died throughout the study, possibly unassociated with CHIKV infection. Conclusions: KTR with CHIKV infection have a clinical presentation and evolution similar to those seen in the general population. Kidney function is generally well preserved, with transitory graft dysfunction without negative impact after 3 months from the beginning of the symptoms. Previous costicosteroids use did not relate with AKI or chronic arthralgia.

9 June 2019 in Journal of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTerezinha Leitão
Terezinha Leitão
AFAntonio M. P. Oliveira Filho
Antonio M. P. Oliveira Filho
JFJosé Evaldo P. Sousa Filho
José Evaldo P. Sousa Filho
BTBruno de Melo Tavares
Bruno de Melo Tavares
JMJacó R. L. Mesquita
Jacó R. L. Mesquita
LDLisandra Serra Damasceno
Lisandra Serra Damasceno
The buffy coat is obtained routinely for disseminated histoplamosis (DH) diagnosis in Ceará, Brazil. The aim of this study is to describe the accuracy of staining smears for Histoplasma in the buffy coat of AIDS-patients with DH. From 2012–2013, all results of stained buffy coat smears and culture for fungi performed at São José Hospital were recorded. In total, 489 buffy coats of 361 patients were studied; 19/361 (5.3%; 95%CI = 2.9–7.6%) had positive direct examination stained smears for Histoplasma and 61/361 (16.9%; 95%CI = 13.0–20.8%) had growth in culture. For those with positive Histoplasma cultures, the CD4 count was significantly lower (139.3 vs. 191.7cells/µL; p = 0.014) than others, and death was 18%. The sensitivity and specificity of stained smears was 25.9% and 100%, respectively. A second test, performed up to 36 days from the first one, increased the sensitivity of stained smears to 32.2%. Stained smears of buffy coat have low accuracy; nonetheless, they are easy to perform and can give a quick diagnosis in low-resource endemic areas. Despite the decrease in mortality, it is not yet to the low levels observed in areas that have better and more efficient methods.

15 May 2024 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuiza Arcas Gonçalves
Luiza Arcas Gonçalves
BABeatriz Barbosa Anjos
Beatriz Barbosa Anjos
BTBruno de Melo Tavares
Bruno de Melo Tavares
AMAna Paula Marchi
Ana Paula Marchi
MFMarina Farrel
Marina Farrel
SCSilvia Figueiredo Costa
Silvia Figueiredo Costa
Background: Assessing the risk of multidrug-resistant colonization and infections is pivotal for optimizing empirical therapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs). Limited data exist on extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) colonization in this population. This study aimed to assess whether ESBL-E colonization constitutes a risk factor for ESBL-E bloodstream infection (BSI) and to evaluate ESBL-E colonization in HSCT recipients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of ESBL-E colonization and BSI in HSCT patients was conducted from August 2019 to June 2022. Weekly swabs were collected and cultured on chromogenic selective media, with PCR identifying the β-lactamase genes. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) assessed the colonizing strains’ similarities. Results: Of 222 evaluated HSCT patients, 59.45% were colonized by ESBL-E, with 48.4% at admission. The predominant β-lactamase genes were blaTEM (52%) and blaSHV (20%). PFGE analysis did not reveal predominant clusters in 26 E. coli and 15 K. pneumoniae strains. WGS identified ST16 and ST11 as the predominant sequence types among K. pneumoniae. Thirty-three patients developed thirty-five Enterobacterales-BSIs, with nine being third-generation cephalosporin-resistant. No association was found between ESBL-E colonization and ESBL-BSI (p = 0.087). Conclusions: Although the patients presented a high colonization rate of ESBL-E upon admission, no association between colonization and infection were found. Thus, it seems that ESBL screening is not a useful strategy to assess risk factors and guide therapy for ESBL-BSI in HSCT-patients.

18 July 2023 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PTPaula Tuma
Paula Tuma
JJJosé M. Vieira Júnior
José M. Vieira Júnior
ERElenara Ribas
Elenara Ribas
KSKaren C. C. D. Silva
Karen C. C. D. Silva
AGAndrea K. F. Gushken
Andrea K. F. Gushken
SVSebastian Vernal
Sebastian Vernal
Beginning in 2018, a quality improvement collaborative initiative in Brazil successfully reduced the baseline incidence density of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care settings after 2 years. We describe the adaptations of the quality improvement interventions as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged and how the pandemic affected the project outcomes.