Mary Jane Spiller

Dr. Mary Jane Spiller

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2009 in Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJulia Simner
Julia Simner
NMNeil Mayo
Neil Mayo
MSMary Jane Spiller
Mary Jane Spiller

1 January 2013 in Behavioural Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
APAchille Pasqualotto
Achille Pasqualotto
MSMary Jane Spiller
Mary Jane Spiller
AJAshok S. Jansari
Ashok S. Jansari
MPMichael J. Proulx
Michael J. Proulx
Representing the position of the objects independently from our own position is a fundamental cognitive ability. Here we investigated whether this ability depends on visual experience. Congenitally blind, late blind and blindfolded sighted participants haptically learnt a room-sized regularly shaped array of objects, and their spatial memory was tested to determine which spatial reference frame was used. Crucially, the use of an object-based reference frame requires representing the regular structure of the array. We found that blindfolded sighted and late blind participants, that is those with visual experience, showed a preferential use of the object-based or 'allocentric' reference frame. On the contrary, congenitally blind participants preferred a self-based, or egocentric, reference frame. This suggests that, due to its developmental effect on the multisensory brain areas involved in spatial cognition, visual experience is necessary to develop a preference for an object-based, allocentric reference frame.

1 January 2015 in Consciousness and Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMary Jane Spiller
Mary Jane Spiller
CJClare N. Jonas
Clare N. Jonas
JSJulia Simner
Julia Simner
AJAshok Jansari
Ashok Jansari
Synesthesia based in visual modalities has been associated with reports of vivid visual imagery. We extend this finding to consider whether other forms of synesthesia are also associated with enhanced imagery, and whether this enhancement reflects the modality of synesthesia. We used self-report imagery measures across multiple sensory modalities, comparing synesthetes' responses (with a variety of forms of synesthesia) to those of non-synesthete matched controls. Synesthetes reported higher levels of visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory and tactile imagery and a greater level of imagery use. Furthermore, their reported enhanced imagery is restricted to the modalities involved in the individual's synesthesia. There was also a relationship between the number of forms of synesthesia an individual has, and the reported vividness of their imagery, highlighting the need for future research to consider the impact of multiple forms of synesthesia. We also recommend the use of behavioral measures to validate these self-report findings.

1 October 2008 in Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMary Jane Spiller
Mary Jane Spiller
AJAshok S. Jansari
Ashok S. Jansari

1 May 2013 in Personality and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael J. Banissy
Michael J. Banissy
HHHenning Holle
Henning Holle
JCJosephine Cassell
Josephine Cassell
LALucy Annett
Lucy Annett
ETElias Tsakanikos
Elias Tsakanikos
JWJamie Ward
Jamie Ward

10 July 2017 in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CJClare Jonas
Clare Jonas
MSMary Jane Spiller
Mary Jane Spiller
PHPaul Hibbard
Paul Hibbard