Transradial artery access (TRA) has been established as the default access site for most coronary catheterization procedures with fewer access-related and bleeding complications, rapid hemostasis, early ambulation of the patient and reduction in all-cause mortality compared with transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains the most frequent complication of TRA coronary catheterization procedures. The purpose of our review was to conduct detailed literature research and summarize all the available treatment strategies for RAO, given the lack of a standardized treatment protocol in the literature. Pharmacological treatment with low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) or other anticoagulant, invasive strategies and pharmaco-invasive methods available in the literature were included in our review. Data was derived from case series, case reports, clinical trials and observational studies. Eight studies regarding pharmacological treatment with LMWH or any other anticoagulant and 7 studies of invasive treatment were included in our review. There are only two randomized studies one with LMWH (tinzaparin) and one with apixaban. Furthermore, taking into consideration data derived from the above-mentioned studies a treatment algorithm for RAO was proposed. RAO remains the most frequent complication of coronary procedures with transradial access. Application of preventive strategies and good knowledge of the risk factors remain the key factor for reduction of the incidence of this clinical entity. Therapeutic options include anticoagulation regimens and interventional techniques through the distal radial artery. Large, randomized, multicenter studies should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the available treatment methods and define a standardized treatment protocol for RAO.
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have emerged in cardiovascular clinical practice. Regarding transcatheter aortic valve replacement/implantation (TAVR/TAVI) procedures, their utilization optimizes procedural planning, aids physicians with decision making, and predicts possible post-procedural complications. Moreover, machine-learning (ML) models, compared with traditional mortality risk scores, show promising results considering predicted mortality in TAVI patients. However, further validation is required. As the implementation of cardiovascular procedures can be challenging, AI technology broadens the armamentarium of tools that a clinician is able to use for a more comprehensive evaluation of patients, minimizing complications and resulting in optimum clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to 20 September 2025, to identify relevant studies. The search strategy included the following keywords: [“TAVI” OR “TAVR”] AND [“AI”, Artificial Intelligence]. Results: According to our database research, 7177 articles were initially screened, and 2145 duplicate articles were excluded. Eventually, 189 articles were evaluated by our reviewers and 51 articles of studies published between 2014 and 2025 were included in our review. Conclusions: AI algorithms could revolutionize the Heart Team decision making process, being not only a tool for patient evaluation but an active member of the team with applications to analyze and optimize all stages of the TAVI procedure, guide decision making and predict outcomes, and, with the contribution and evaluation of information from all human members of the team, enhance even more the patient-mediated medicine/interventions.
Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is characterized by progressive myocardial infiltration leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy and heart failure. While left ventricular assessment has traditionally dominated prognostic evaluation, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and RV–pulmonary artery (PA) coupling have emerged as critical determinants of outcomes. Objectives: This review synthesizes current evidence on RV–PA coupling as a prognostic marker in cardiac amyloidosis, examining measurement methodologies, prognostic significance, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical applications. Methods: We comprehensively reviewed the recent literature on RV–PA coupling in CA, focusing on studies published from 2020 to 2025, including both AL and ATTR subtypes. We analyzed data from multicenter cohorts, prospective registries, and validation studies examining the relationship between RV–PA coupling indices and clinical outcomes. Results: RV–PA coupling, most commonly assessed using the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio, consistently demonstrates strong independent prognostic value for mortality and heart failure outcomes in CA patients. Impaired coupling (TAPSE/PASP < 0.45 mm/mmHg) identifies high-risk patients with hazard ratios ranging from 1.98 to 4.17 for adverse outcomes. In a multicenter cohort of 283 patients, TAPSE/PASP < 0.45 mm/mmHg was independently associated with death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.32–2.96, p = 0.001) and significantly improved risk reclassification (NRI 0.46–0.49). In ATTR-specific populations receiving disease-modifying therapy, impaired coupling (TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.382 mm/mmHg) predicted three-year mortality with an adjusted HR of 2.99. The coupling index provides incremental value over individual RV parameters by accounting for afterload conditions and demonstrates consistent prognostic performance across both AL and ATTR subtypes. Conclusions: RV–PA coupling represents a robust, easily obtainable prognostic marker that should be routinely assessed in CA patients for risk stratification and clinical decision-making. The TAPSE/PASP ratio can be calculated from standard echocardiographic examinations without additional cost or time, making it practical for widespread implementation. Future research should focus on standardizing measurement protocols, establishing disease-specific thresholds, evaluating coupling trajectories with novel therapies, and integrating coupling assessment into staging systems and management algorithms. The strong prognostic signal, pathophysiological relevance, and ease of measurement position RV–PA coupling as an essential component of comprehensive cardiac amyloidosis evaluation.
Background: Intravenous (IV) flecainide is recommended for the pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of IV flecainide, co-administered with oral b-blockers, for the cardioversion of paroxysmal AF. Methods: Single-center registry, initiated in the “Skylitseion” General Hospital of Chios in January 2020. The main inclusion criterion was IV flecainide administration plus oral b-blocker for recent-onset AF (≤48 h). The primary outcome was conversion to sinus rhythm at 2 h. Results: A total of 121 (73 males and 48 females, with mean age 61.4 years) consecutive, unselected patients who complied with the study protocol were included. A successful conversion to sinus rhythm at 2 h was achieved in 99 patients (success rate: 81.8%). The median conversion time was 11.7 min (varied from 3 to 23 min). Duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in patients who were successfully cardioverted with IV flecainide (10.9 vs. 30.7 h, p < 0.001). No serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: This is one of the largest registries worldwide, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of IV flecainide co-administered with a b-blocker in the acute management of recent-onset AF. The successful conversion rate at 2 h is very high and quick with no serious adverse events.
Chios Mastiha essential oil (CMO) is a natural product extracted from the resin of Mastiha, possessing antioxidant, anti-microbial, anti-ulcer, anti-neoplasmatic and cholesterol lowering capabilities in vitro, and its hypolipidemic effect was confirmed in animal studies. Yet, there are no randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies in the literature regarding CMO's hypolipidemic effects in humans. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to study the hypolipidemic effect of CMO capsules on healthy volunteers with elevated cholesterol. 192 healthy volunteers were screened and 160 of them with total cholesterol> 200 mg/dl participated in the study. They were randomized with a 2:1 ratio of receiving CMO capsules (200 mg mastiha-oil/capsule) and placebo for 8 weeks respectively. 113 patients received CMO and 47 were randomized in the control group, and all of them completed the follow-up period. After 8 weeks of CMO administration, total and LDL cholesterol were significantly lower in the CMO compared to the placebo group 215.2±27.5 vs 237.0±27.9 mg/dl (p<0.001) and 135.0±26.1 vs 153.0±23.3 mg/dl (p<0.001) respectively. No gastrointestinal adverse events, liver or renal toxicity were reported. Additionally, in the CMO group total cholesterol was significantly decreased by 20.6 mg/dl (9%) and LDL by 18.1 mg/dl (12%), triglycerides by 21.8 mg/dl (15%) and glucose by 4.6 mg/dl (5%) and HDL was increased by 2.4 mg/dl (5%), compared to their baseline values. MASTIHA-OIL study showed the efficacy and safety of CMO in reduction of Total and LDL-cholesterol after 8 weeks of administration in healthy volunteers with elevated cholesterol levels.