Sagittal craniosynostosis, a rare but fascinating craniofacial anomaly, presents a unique challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. This condition involves premature fusion of the sagittal suture, which alters the normal growth pattern of the skull and can affect neurological development. Sagittal craniosynostosis is characterised by a pronounced head shape, often referred to as scaphocephaly. Asymmetry of the face and head, protrusion of the fontanel, and increased intracranial pressure are common clinical manifestations. Early recognition of these features is crucial for early intervention, and understanding the aetiology is, therefore, essential. Although the exact cause remains unclear, genetic factors are thought to play an important role. Mutations in genes such as FGFR2 and FGFR3, which disrupt the normal development of the skull, are suspected. Environmental factors and various insults during pregnancy can also contribute to the occurrence of the disease. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for treatment. Imaging studies such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional reconstructions play a crucial role in visualising the prematurely fused sagittal suture. Clinicians also rely on a physical examination and medical history to confirm the diagnosis. Early detection allows for quick intervention and better treatment outcomes. The treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes neurosurgery, craniofacial surgery, and paediatric care. Traditional treatment consists of an open reconstruction of the cranial vault, where the fused suture is surgically released to allow normal growth of the skull. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy, are becoming increasingly popular due to their lower morbidity and shorter recovery times. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sagittal craniosynostosis, highlighting the aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and current treatment options.

Pediatric epidural hematomas (EDH) represent a neurosurgical emergency. Both surgical and conservative treatment can lead to a good clinical outcome. The aim of the study was to review our series of pediatric EDH and to determine the clinical and radiologic factors, which can influence the final outcome. All children aged from 0 to 16 that have been treated between 2013 and 2017 for cranial EDH have been selected. Thirty children have been included in the study. Seventeen cases have been treated with surgical evacuation and 13 conservatively. Six months after the trauma, the outcome was excellent (mRS 0) in 25/30 (83.3%) cases, mild deficits (mRS 1–2) were present in 4/30 (13.3%), and severe deficits (mRS 3–5) in 1/30 (3.3%) cases. Only a GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) below 8 at admission was significantly related to the presence of a neurologic deficit at 6 months (p = 0.048). EDH can be managed with excellent outcomes. Even in the presence of bad initial clinical and radiologic conditions, a correct treatment strategy can lead to a good recovery. In our series, only a GCS below 8 at admission was significantly related to the presence of neurological sequelae.

The supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach is frequently used for the treatment of lesions in the pineal and posterior third ventricle region and can be performed in a sitting or prone posi...

Chiari malformations encompass various radiological and clinical entities, sharing the herniation of the rhombencephalic structures through the foramen magnum as a common characteristic. They can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. The therapeutic strategies for these malformations differ on the basis of the diverse pathophysiologic processes that cause them. As Chiari malformations are caused by various pathophysiologic processes, they must be recognized promptly to select the best treatment for each single case.

Background: Craniosynostosis is a rare congenital disease of the skull. They arise when one or more cranial sutures ossify prematurely. This causes an obstruction to normal brain growth and leads to specific deformations of the skull, which may result in intracranial hypertension and cognitive delay. Materials and methods: We have retrospectively analysed all children treated at the Unit of paediatric neurosurgery of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between June 2015 and September 2020. The following items have been recorded: affected suture, underlying syndromic condition, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, raised intracranial pressure, age at surgery, surgical technique, need for multiple operations and surgical complications. Results: During the study period, 71 children have been treated for craniosynostosis. The median postoperative follow-up was 31 months. There were: 54.9% sagittal, 25.3% metopic, 14.0% unicoronal, 1.4% bicoronal and 1.4% unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis. Multiple sutures were affected in 2.8% cases. 7.0% of the cases were syndromic. Overall, 74 surgical procedures have been performed: frontoorbital advancement represented 40.5% of them; biparietal remodelling 32.4%: total cranial vault remodelling 22.9%; posterior distraction 2.7%; posterior expansion 1.3%. Median age at surgery was 12.8 months. Conclusions: The treatment of craniosynostosis is surgical and requires a multidisciplinary approach, with expertise in plastic and reconstructive surgery, maxillofacial surgery and neurosurgery. The aim of surgical treatment is to release the constrictive and deformative effect that the synostosis has on skull growth. This requires a remodelling of the neurocranium and, if necessary, of the viscerocranium. Beyond aesthetic purposes, the primary aim of surgical treatment is to permit a normal development of the brain.