Canopy cover is an important indicator and commonly used in forest management applications. Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle (UAV)—Borne Laser Scanning (ULS) has drawn increasing attention as a new alternative source for forest field inventory due to its spatial resolution comparable to that of Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS). In this study, the performance of plot canopy cover estimations from ULS and TLS is investigated. The experiment was conducted in 16 plots from two Pinus massoniana forests with different stand conditions in Guangxi, China. Both the Canopy Height Model (CHM)-based and Individual Tree Delineation (ITD)-based methods were used to estimate the canopy cover. The influence of CHM pixel sizes on the estimations was also analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the accuracies of ULS ($R^2$: 0.992–0.996, $RMSE$: 0.591–0.820%) were better than those of TLS ($R^2$: 0.541–0.846, $RMSE$: 3.642–6.297%) when compared against the reference. The average difference between the ULS and TLS estimations was 6.91%, and the disagreement increased as the forest complexity increased. The reasonable CHM pixel sizes for the canopy cover estimations were 0.07–1.2 m for ULS and 0.07–1.5 m for TLS. This study can provide useful information for the selection of data sources and estimation methods in plot canopy cover mapping.

Forest height plays a crucial role in various fields, such as forest ecology, resource management, natural disaster management, and environmental protection. In order to obtain accurate and efficient measurements of forest height over large areas, in this study, Terra Synthetic Aperture Radar-X and the TerraSAR-X Add-on for Digital Elevation Measurement (TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X), Sentinel-2A, and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data were used, and various feature combinations were established in conjunction with measurements from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Classification and regression tree (CART), gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were employed to estimate forest height in the study area. Independent validation on the basis of LiDAR forest height samples showed the following results: (1) Regarding feature combinations, the combination of coherence and decorrelation of volume scattering provided by TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X data outperformed the combination of backscatter coefficient and local incidence angle, as well as the combination of coherence, decorrelation of volume scattering, backscatter coefficient, and local incidence angle. The best results (R² = 0.67, RMSE = 2.89 m) were achieved with the combination of coherence and decorrelation of volume scattering using the GBDT and RF algorithms. (2) In terms of machine learning methods, the GBDT algorithm proved suitable for estimating forest height. The most effective approach for forest height mapping involved combining the GBDT algorithm with coherence, decorrelation of volume scattering, and a small amount of LiDAR forest height data, used as training data.

Mapping large-scale tree species distributions is essential for accurately estimating forest carbon storage. Previous studies have shown that Satellite Image Time Series (SITS) can be effective for classifying tree species. However, many of these studies rely heavily on manual feature engineering or overlook critical geoscientific and forestry knowledge. Such domain-specific insights are particularly important in Earth observation because the same species can exhibit diverse spatio-temporal behaviors across different regions, leading to lower accuracy and limited model robustness. In this work, we propose a novel model, PTSViT, which integrates phenological information with deep spatio-temporal features to address these limitations. Our model’s loss function incorporates phenological priors, utilizing ground-based phenological data and tree species labels as supervisory signals to guide the learning of spatio-temporal encoders. We evaluate PTSViT on a newly created dataset, GXData, which includes 11 major tree species in GuangXi. Our model surpasses previous approaches across all evaluation metrics, demonstrating the value of integrating prior knowledge for automated, accurate tree species mapping.