Telerehabilitation is an appealing service delivery option for optimising recovery. Internationally, the equity of telerehabilitation services for people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds has been questioned. Using a 31-item survey, our study explored the access, readiness and willingness of 260 patients receiving allied health services from a large tertiary health service located in Sydney, Australia, to use telerehabilitation for adults. Overall, 72% patients reported having access to technology, 38% met our readiness criteria and 53% reported willingness to engage in telerehabilitation. There were no differences in access, readiness and willingness to engage in telerehabilitation between patients from CALD and non-CALD backgrounds. Age was the only factor that influenced access (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.97), readiness (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98) and willingness (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00) to engage in telerehabilitation. Past experience of telerehabilitation was related to willingness (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.55–4.79) but not access (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.68) or readiness (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 0.93 to 3.87). Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring positive patient experiences to promote ongoing willingness to use telerehabilitation. Efforts are needed to improve patients’ digital health literacy, especially patients from older age groups, to ensure equitable engagement in telerehabilitation services.

(1) Background: The local divergence exponent (LDE) is a sensitive measure of walking stability deterioration and risk of falling in older adults. We aim to determine the validity the LDE measured using a mobile phone and to assess its ability to discriminate between healthy young and older adults; (2) Methods: 20 older adults (76.4 ± 4.6 years) and 20 young adults (29.1 ± 6.5 yrs) walked for 6 min on a 20-m walkway while wearing a research-grade inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a mobile phone placed on the sternum to record 3D acceleration data. The LDE was calculated using data from both devices for 3D, vertical (VT), mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and norm (N) accelerations. ICC (3,1) was used to determine the validity of the mobile phone’s LDE. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to determine age-group discriminability of LDE measures; (3) Results: LDEs demonstrated excellent absolute agreement between the wearable IMU and mobile phone (ICC = 0.844). Mobile phone-derived LDEs demonstrated excellent validity relative to the wearable IMU (ICC > 0.75). No significant age-related differences in LDE were observed; wearable or mobile sensors (both p > 0.05); (4) Conclusions: LDEs measures obtained with a mobile phone are valid. No age group differences were identified.

Curriculum renewal is a priority in higher education, yet its enactment is complex and contested. It involves negotiating institutional imperatives, disciplinary identities and the lived realities ...

Telerehabilitation is an appealing service delivery option for optimising recovering. Internationally, the equity of telerehabilitation services for people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds has been questioned. Using a 31-item survey, our study explored the access, readiness, and willingness of 260 patients to use allied health telerehabilitation services for adults receiving interventions from a large tertiary health service located in Sydney, Australia. Overall, 72% patients reported having access to technology, 38% met our readiness criteria, and 53% reported willingness to engage in telerehabilitation. There were no difference in access, readiness and willingness to engage in telerehabilitation between patients from CALD and non-CALD backgrounds. Age was the only factor that influenced access, readiness and willingness to engage in telerehabilitation. Past experience of telerehabilitation was related to willingness, but not access or readiness. Findings highlight the importance of ensuring positive patient experiences to promote ongoing willingness to use telerehabilitation. Efforts are needed to improve patients’ digital health literacy, especially patients from older age groups, to ensure equitable access to telerehabilitation services.

Inertial measurement units are increasingly used to assess human movement and balance performance and impairment in a broad range of applications, but mostly in laboratory settings. Smartphones can record balance time-series data for non-linear analyses such as sample entropy (SE), multiscale sample entropy (MSE) and its derived complexity index (CI), but the validity and agreement of phone-derived entropy measures are unknown.Are SE and CI obtained from mobile phone sensors valid when compared to research-grade wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs)?Twenty healthy young adults performed two 2-minute quiet standing postural tasks: eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). 3D acceleration time series were recorded using a mobile phone and a research-grade wearable IMU. CI was calculated using 20-scale multiscale SE analysis for each acceleration direction. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to assess validity of CI measures and Bland-Altman plots examined agreement. Secondarily, the effect of visual condition, EO and EC, was also analysed.Most ICC values were good-to-excellent, which indicates the validity of CI obtained with a mobile phone, with minimal, non-proportional bias. Significantly higher SE and CI were found for the norm, whereas CI was higher in AP and SE in the VT direction.Mobile phones can validly capture non-linear complexity measures of balance control, enabling more accessible and potentially more sensitive assessment and monitoring for ageing and clinical populations. Agreement was lower for SE than its derivative, CI, a potentially robust measure which merits further investigation.