Hui Xu

Hui Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 May 2022 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
LOLongwen Ou
Longwen Ou
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li
THTroy R. Hawkins
Troy R. Hawkins
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang
This study presents a life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) and renewable diesel (RD, or hydroprocessed easters and fatty acids) production from oilseed crops, distillers corn oil, used cooking oil, and tallow. Updated data for biofuel production and waste fat rendering were collected through industry surveys. Life-cycle GHG emissions reductions for producing biodiesel and RD from soybean, canola, and carinata oils range from 40% to 69% after considering land-use change estimations, compared with petroleum diesel. Converting tallow, used cooking oil, and distillers corn oil to biodiesel and RD could achieve higher GHG reductions of 79% to 86% lower than petroleum diesel. The biodiesel route has lower GHG emissions for oilseed-based pathways than the RD route because transesterification is less energy-intensive than hydro-processing. In contrast, processing feedstocks with high free fatty acid such as tallow via the biodiesel route results in slightly higher GHG emissions than the RD route, mainly due to higher energy use for pretreatment. Besides land-use change and allocation methods, key factors driving biodiesel and RD life-cycle GHG emissions include fertilizer use and nitrous oxide emissions for crop farming, energy use for grease rendering, and energy and chemicals input for biofuel conversion.

1 September 2019 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wenze YueWenze Yue
Wenze Yue
SQShuangshuang Qiu
Shuangshuang Qiu
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
LXLihua Xu
Lihua Xu
LZLinlin Zhang
Linlin Zhang

6 January 2023 in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
UGUlises R. Gracida-Alvarez
Ulises R. Gracida-Alvarez
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
PBPahola Thathiana Benavides
Pahola Thathiana Benavides
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang
THTroy R. Hawkins
Troy R. Hawkins

15 August 2022 in ACS ES&T Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSabyasachi Das
Sabyasachi Das
MOMargaret G. O’cOnnell
Margaret G. O’cOnnell
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
RBRoy Bernstein
Roy Bernstein
JKJae-Hong Kim
Jae-Hong Kim
Jennifer B.  DunnJennifer B. Dunn
Jennifer B. Dunn

26 May 2019 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
HSHeidi Sieverding
Heidi Sieverding
HKHoyoung Kwon
Hoyoung Kwon
DCDavid Clay
David Clay
CSCatherine Stewart
Catherine Stewart
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang
Corn (Zea mays L.) stover is a global resource used for livestock, fuel, and bioenergy feedstock, but excessive stover removal can decrease soil organic C (SOC) stocks and deteriorate soil health. Many site‐specific stover removal experiments report accrual rates and SOC stock effects, but a quantitative, global synthesis is needed to provide a scientific base for long‐term energy policy decisions. We used 409 data points from 74 stover harvest experiments conducted around the world for a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression to quantify removal rate, tillage, soil texture, and soil sampling depth effects on SOC. Changes were quantified by: (a) comparing final SOC stock differences after at least 3 years with and without stover removal and (b) calculating SOC accrual rates for both treatments. Stover removal generally reduced final SOC stocks by 8% in the upper 0–15 or 0–30 cm, compared to stover retained, irrespective of soil properties and tillage practices. A more sensitive meta‐regression analysis showed that retention increased SOC stocks within the 30–150 cm depth by another 5%. Compared to baseline values, stover retention increased average SOC stocks temporally at a rate of 0.41 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (statistically significant at p < 0.01 when averaged across all soil layers). Although SOC sequestration rates were lower with stover removal, with moderate (<50%) removal they can be positive, thus emphasizing the importance of site‐specific management. Our results also showed that tillage effects on SOC stocks were inconsistent due to the high variability in practices used among the experimental sites. Finally, we conclude that research and technological efforts should continue to be given high priority because of the importance in providing science‐based policy recommendations for long‐term global carbon management.

15 October 2021 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HXHui Xu
Hui Xu
GLGregory Latta
Gregory Latta
ULUisung Lee
Uisung Lee
JLJan Lewandrowski
Jan Lewandrowski
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang
This study presents a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis (LCA) of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the electricity generated from forest biomass in different regions of the United States (U.S.), taking into consideration regional variations in biomass availabilities and logistics. The regional biomass supply for a 20 MW bioelectricity facility is estimated using the Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) model. Results from LURA and data on regional forest management, harvesting, and processing are incorporated into the GHGs, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model for LCA. The results suggest that GHG emissions of mill residues-based pathways can be 15–52% lower than those of pulpwood-based pathways, with logging residues falling in between. Nonetheless, our analysis suggests that screening bioenergy projects on specific feedstock types alone is not sufficient because GHG emissions of a pulpwood-based pathway in one state can be lower than those of a mill residue-based pathway in another state. Furthermore, the available biomass supply often consists of several woody feedstocks, and its composition is region-dependent. Forest biomass-derived electricity is associated with 86–93% lower life-cycle GHG emissions than the emissions of the average grid electricity in the U.S. Key factors driving bioelectricity GHG emissions include electricity generation efficiency, transportation distance, and energy use for biomass harvesting and processing.