Homocysteine has long been studied as a potential cardiovascular risk factor due to its biochemical role in endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, and thrombogenesis. Despite strong epidemiological and mechanistic support, the translation of homocysteine-lowering interventions into clinical benefit remains controversial. This non-systematic review aims to clarify the current understanding of homocysteine in the cardiovascular setting by distinguishing between well-established facts, clinically relevant interventions, and persistent misconceptions. We first revisit the historical emergence of homocysteine as a cardiovascular biomarker and explore its pathophysiological mechanisms, including endothelial damage, atherosclerosis progression, and prothrombotic effects—supported by in vitro and animal model studies. Subsequently, we evaluate evidence-based interventions such as B-vitamin supplementation (folate, B6, B12), lifestyle modifications, and the clinical relevance of homocysteine monitoring in specific populations (e.g., MTHFR mutations, chronic kidney disease). We then discuss common pitfalls, including the overinterpretation of genetic variants, the inappropriate use of supplementation, and the overreliance on surrogate biomarkers in clinical trials. Although elevated homocysteine remains a reproducible biomarker of cardiovascular risk, current evidence does not support routine intervention in unselected populations. A precision medicine approach—targeting high-risk subgroups and integrating homocysteine into broader cardiometabolic management—may help unlock its therapeutic relevance. Future pharmacological strategies should prioritize mechanistic insight, patient stratification, and clinically meaningful endpoints.

Long COVID is a persistent post-viral syndrome with the significant involvement of both the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, often extending well beyond the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerging evidence has highlighted a spectrum of chronic alterations, including endothelial dysfunction, microvascular inflammation, perivascular fibrosis, and in some cases, the persistence of viral components in the cardiac and pulmonary tissues. At the molecular level, a sustained inflammatory milieu—characterized by elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6)—and chronic platelet hyperreactivity contribute to a prothrombotic state. These mechanisms are implicated in microvascular damage, cardiac strain, and impaired gas exchange, correlating with clinical manifestations such as fatigue, dyspnea, chest discomfort, and reduced exercise capacity. In certain patients, especially those who were not hospitalized during the acute phase, cardiac MRI and myocardial biopsy may reveal signs of myocardial inflammation and autonomic dysregulation. These often subclinical cardiovascular alterations underscore the need for improved diagnostic strategies, integrating molecular and histopathological markers during post-COVID evaluations. Recognizing persistent inflammatory and thrombotic activity may inform risk stratification and individualized therapeutic approaches. The interdependence between pulmonary fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction highlights the importance of multidisciplinary care. In this context, molecular and tissue-based diagnostics play a pivotal role in elucidating the long-term cardio-pulmonary sequelae of long COVID and guiding targeted interventions. Early identification and structured follow-up are essential to mitigate the burden of chronic complications in affected individuals.

In recent decades, the novel role of Galectin-3 (Gal-3) in both physiological and pathological conditions has emerged. Gal-3 is a key protein involved in immunity, inflammation, cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Its physiological role is crucial for the regulation of these cellular functions. In pathological settings, elevated levels of Gal-3 are associated with diseases such as cancer, heart failure, and fibrotic diseases, making it an important diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in these conditions. It seems that Gal-3 acts as a bridge between different diseases. Because of its pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic properties, it connects atherosclerosis and cancer, regulating inflammation, cell proliferation, immune evasion, angiogenesis and survival in both diseases. Specifically, in atherosclerosis, Gal-3 promotes plaque formation by driving inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid deposition, and vascular cell migration. In cancer, Gal-3 influences tumor growth and metastasis by modulating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, increasing cell survival, and enhancing cell–matrix and cell–cell interactions. Moreover, by stimulating fibroblasts, Gal-3 favors matrix deposition and tissue fibrosis that together with the inflammatory properties contributes to adverse ventricular remodeling leading to heart failure. Finally, taking into account its role in pathogen recognition and immune cells (B and T cells) modulation, Gal-3 might be a critical factor in host defense, disease progression, and the development of autoimmune conditions. Thus, targeting Gal-3 might be a promising therapeutic strategy to pursue for management of different pathological scenarios.

Arterial hypertension remains the major cardiovascular risk worldwide. It is estimated that under 50 years of age one in every three adults is hypertensive while beyond the age of 50 the prevalence is almost 50% globally. The latest World Health Organization (WHO) Global Report on Hypertension indicated that the global number of hypertensive patients almost doubled in the last three decades, with related increasing deaths, disability, and costs annually. Because of this global increase, early diagnosis and timely treatment is of great importance. However, based on the WHO Global Report, it is estimated that up to 46% of individuals were never diagnosed. Of those diagnosed, less than 50% were on treatment, with nearly half among these at target according to the current guidelines. It is also important to note that an increasing number of hypertensive patients, despite the use of three or more drugs, still do not achieve a blood pressure normalization, thus defining the clinical scenario of resistant hypertension (RH). This condition is associated to a higher risk of hypertension-mediated organ damage and hospitalization due to acute cardiovascular events. Current guidelines recommend a triple combination therapy (renin angiotensin system blocking agent + a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic + a dihydropyridinic calcium-channel blocker) to all patients with RH. Beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, should be also considered based on concomitant conditions and potential contraindications. Finally, the renal denervation is also proposed in patients with preserved kidney function that remain hypertensive despite the use of maximum tolerated medical treatment. However, the failure of this procedure in the long term and the contraindication in patients with kidney failure is a strong call for a new therapeutic approach. In the present review, we will discuss the pharmacological novelties to come for the management of hypertension and RH in the next future.

Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a powerful vasodilator approved for treating acute hypertensive crises, acute heart failure, aortic dissection, and both controlled perioperative hypotension and perioperative hypertension. Its unique ability to cause both venous and arterial dilation makes it an invaluable option in critical care settings. Despite concerns regarding its manageability due to potential toxicity, it is a safe choice if properly used, as highlighted by its short half-life and minimal side effects. This review aims to summarize its pharmacological properties, toxicology, and various clinical applications, particularly focusing on acute heart failure and hypertensive emergencies.

Cardiovascular diseases represent one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide despite tremendous advancements in therapeutic interventions. Prevention remains one of the most effective strategies to reduce individual risk. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), through its genetic variants (ε2, ε3, ε4), is a well-known modulator of cardiovascular risk, traditionally studied for its role in lipid metabolism. However, recent evidence suggests that ApoE also influences endothelial function and thrombotic processes, opening new perspectives for an integrated approach to risk assessment. This narrative review explores the potential of using the APOE genotype as a key genetic biomarker, integrated with emerging endothelial markers (e.g., plasma levels of endothelin-1, nitric oxide, von Willebrand factor, endothelial adhesion molecules) to achieve a more accurate and personalized stratification of cardiovascular and thrombotic risk. The combined approach may overcome the limitations of traditional thrombophilia screening, which is often poorly informative when performed without clear clinical criteria, and may guide more targeted therapeutic decisions, particularly in borderline-risk individuals or those with unexplained thrombotic events. Finally, the review discusses the clinical implications, current challenges, and future perspectives for integrating this model into clinical practice within the framework of precision medicine. The early identification of genetically predisposed patients, together with functional endothelial assessment, could represent a breakthrough in modern cardiovascular prevention.