Michael Roos

Dr. Michael Roos

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2005 in Journal of Economic Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos

20 July 2006 in Applied Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos
Cross-sectional evidence on price levels is scarce for all countries. However, several studies suggest that there might exist considerable differences in price levels within countries, which has obvious welfare implications. A sample of price levels in 50 German cities in 1993 is used to analyse the determinants of inter-city price level differentials. The most important explanatory variables for price level differentials are population size and density and the average wage level. Using this information, the price levels are predicted in all 440 German districts and aggregated to the state level. At the state level convergence of the price levels to a common mean is found, but at a very low speed. The estimated half-life is about 19 years.

1 May 2012 in German Economic Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos
USUlrich Schmidt
Ulrich Schmidt

1 May 2008 in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos

31 July 2019 in Social Choice and Welfare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWolfgang J. Luhan
Wolfgang J. Luhan
OPOdile Poulsen
Odile Poulsen
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos
We augment the Nash bargaining solution by fairness ideals in order to predict the outcomes of unstructured bargaining after the individual production of a joint surplus. If production depends on individual effort, talent, and luck, fairness ideals might be based on the accountability principle. In a lab experiment with real production and unstructured bargaining, we investigate subjects’ fairness ideals, their bargaining behaviour, and the outcomes of the bargaining process. As impartial spectators, about 75% of the subjects hold meritocratic or libertarian fairness ideals. However, these ideals do not affect their bargaining behaviour which is strongly opportunistic. Therefore the fairness-augmented Nash solution with opportunistic fairness ideals predicts the bargaining outcome best.

31 March 2008 in European Journal of Political Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichael Roos
Michael Roos