Todd J Kilbaugh

Dr. Todd J Kilbaugh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 November 2020 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDCaroline Diorio
Caroline Diorio
SHSarah E. Henrickson
Sarah E. Henrickson
LVLaura A. Vella
Laura A. Vella
KMKevin O. McNerney
Kevin O. McNerney
JCJulie Chase
Julie Chase
HBHamid Bassiri
Hamid Bassiri
BACKGROUND. Initial reports from the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV-2) pandemic described children as being less susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than adults. Subsequently, a severe and novel pediatric disorder termed multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) emerged. We report on unique hematologic and immunologic parameters that distinguish between COVID-19 and MIS-C and provide insight into pathophysiology. METHODS. We prospectively enrolled hospitalized patients with evidence of SARS–CoV-2 infection and classified them as having MIS-C or COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were classified as having either minimal or severe disease. Cytokine profiles, viral cycle thresholds (Cts), blood smears, and soluble C5b-9 values were analyzed with clinical data. RESULTS. Twenty patients were enrolled (9 severe COVID-19, 5 minimal COVID-19, and 6 MIS-C). Five cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) contributed to the analysis. TNF-α and IL-10 discriminated between patients with MIS-C and severe COVID-19. The presence of burr cells on blood smears, as well as Cts, differentiated between patients with severe COVID-19 and those with MIS-C. CONCLUSION. Pediatric patients with SARS–CoV-2 are at risk for critical illness with severe COVID-19 and MIS-C. Cytokine profiling and examination of peripheral blood smears may distinguish between patients with MIS-C and those with severe COVID-19. FUNDING. Financial support for this project was provided by CHOP Frontiers Program Immune Dysregulation Team; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Cancer Institute; the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society; Cookies for Kids Cancer; Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer; Children’s Oncology Group; Stand UP 2 Cancer; Team Connor; the Kate Amato Foundations; Burroughs Wellcome Fund CAMS; the Clinical Immunology Society; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; and the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics.

12 January 2016 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJavier J. Lasa
Javier J. Lasa
RRRachel S. Rogers
Rachel S. Rogers
RLRussell Localio
Russell Localio
JSJustine Shults
Justine Shults
TRTia Raymond
Tia Raymond
ATAlexis Topjian
Alexis Topjian
Background—: Although extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can result in survival after failed conventional CPR (C-CPR), no large, systematic comparison of pediatric E-CPR and continued C-CPR has been reported. Methods and Results—: Consecutive patients <18 years old with CPR events ≥10 minutes in duration reported to the Get With the Guidelines–Resuscitation registry between January 2000 and December 2011 were identified. Hospitals were grouped by teaching status and location. Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Regression modeling was performed, conditioning on hospital groups. A secondary analysis was performed with the use of propensity score matching. Of 3756 evaluable patients, 591 (16%) received E-CPR and 3165 (84%) received C-CPR only. Survival to hospital discharge and survival with favorable neurological outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1–3 or unchanged from admission) were greater for E-CPR (40% [237 of 591] and 27% [133 of 496]) versus C-CPR patients (27% [862 of 3165] and 18% [512 of 2840]). Odds ratios (ORs) for survival to hospital discharge and survival with favorable neurological outcome were greater for E-CPR versus C-CPR. After adjustment for covariates, patients receiving E-CPR had higher odds of survival to discharge (OR, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.13–3.69; P <0.001) and survival with favorable neurological outcome (OR, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.91–3.64; P <0.001) than patients who received C-CPR. This association persisted when analyzed by propensity score–matched cohorts (OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.33–2.18; P <0.001; and OR, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–2.41; P <0.001, respectively]. Conclusion—: For children with in-hospital CPR of ≥10 minutes duration, E-CPR was associated with improved survival to hospital discharge and survival with favorable neurological outcome compared with C-CPR.

1 May 2015 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlbert Faro
Albert Faro
RWRobert E. Wood
Robert E. Wood
MSMichael S. Schechter
Michael S. Schechter
ALAlbin B. Leong
Albin B. Leong
EWEric Wittkugel
Eric Wittkugel
PMPeter H. Michelson
Peter H. Michelson
Background: Flexible airway endoscopy (FAE) is an accepted and frequently performed procedure in the evaluation of children with known or suspected airway and lung parenchymal disorders. However, published technical standards on how to perform FAE in children are lacking. Methods: The American Thoracic Society (ATS) approved the formation of a multidisciplinary committee to delineate technical standards for performing FAE in children. The committee completed a pragmatic synthesis of the evidence and used the evidence synthesis to answer clinically relevant questions. Results: There is a paucity of randomized controlled trials in pediatric FAE. The committee developed recommendations based predominantly on the collective clinical experience of our committee members highlighting the importance of FAE-specific airway management techniques and anesthesia, establishing suggested competencies for the bronchoscopist in training, and defining areas deserving further investigation. Conclusions: These ATS-sponsored technical standards describe the equipment, personnel, competencies, and special procedures associated with FAE in children.

1 February 2017 in Resuscitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRyan W. Morgan
Ryan W. Morgan
TKTodd J Kilbaugh
Todd J Kilbaugh
WSWesley Shoap
Wesley Shoap
GBGeorge Bratinov
George Bratinov
YLYuxi Lin
Yuxi Lin
RSRobert M. Sutton
Robert M. Sutton

1 May 2011 in Journal of Neurotrauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTodd J Kilbaugh
Todd J Kilbaugh
SBSunita Bhandare
Sunita Bhandare
DLDavid H. Lorom
David H. Lorom
MSManda Saraswati
Manda Saraswati
CRCourtney L. Robertson
Courtney L. Robertson
SMSusan S. Margulies
Susan S. Margulies
Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to be neuroprotective in mature animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its effects on immature animal models of TBI are unknown. In mature animal models, CsA inhibits the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP), thereby maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis following injury by inhibiting calcium influx and preserving mitochondrial membrane potential. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CsA's ability to preserve mitochondrial bioenergetic function following TBI (as measured by mitochondrial respiration and cerebral microdialysis), in two immature models (focal and diffuse), and in two different species (rat and piglet). Three groups were studied: injured+CsA, injured+saline vehicle, and uninjured shams. In addition, we evaluated CsA's effects on cerebral hemodynamics as measured by a novel thermal diffusion probe. The results demonstrate that post-injury administration of CsA ameliorates mitochondrial dysfunction, preserves cerebral blood flow (CBF), and limits neuropathology in immature animals 24 h post-TBI. Mitochondria were isolated 24 h after controlled cortical impact (CCI) in rats and rapid non-impact rotational injury (RNR) in piglets, and CsA ameliorated cerebral bioenergetic crisis with preservation of the respiratory control ratio (RCR) to sham levels. Results were more dramatic in RNR piglets than in CCI rats. In piglets, CsA also preserved lactate pyruvate ratios (LPR), as measured by cerebral microdialysis and CBF at sham levels 24 h after injury, in contrast to the significant alterations seen in injured piglets compared to shams (p<0.01). The administration of CsA to piglets following RNR promoted a 42% decrease in injured brain volume (p<0.01). We conclude that CsA exhibits significant neuroprotective activity in immature models of focal and diffuse TBI, and has exciting translational potential as a therapeutic agent for neuroprotection in children.

1 March 2019 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndrew Lautz
Andrew Lautz
RMRyan W. Morgan
Ryan W. Morgan
MKMichael Karlsson
Michael Karlsson
CMConstantine D. Mavroudis
Constantine D. Mavroudis
TKTiffany S. Ko
Tiffany S. Ko
TKTodd J Kilbaugh
Todd J Kilbaugh
Objectives: Less than half of the thousands of children who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrests annually survive, and neurologic injury is common among survivors. Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves short-term survival, but its impact on longer term survival and mitochondrial respiration—a potential neurotherapeutic target—remains unknown. The primary objectives of this study were to compare rates of 24-hour survival with favorable neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest treated with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus standard depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to compare brain and heart mitochondrial respiration between groups 24 hours after resuscitation. Design: Randomized preclinical large animal trial. Setting: A large animal resuscitation laboratory at a large academic children’s hospital. Subjects: Twenty-eight 4-week-old female piglets (8–11 kg). Interventions: Twenty-two swine underwent 7 minutes of asphyxia followed by ventricular fibrillation and randomized treatment with either hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 10; compression depth titrated to aortic systolic pressure of 90 mm Hg, vasopressors titrated to coronary perfusion pressure ≥ 20 mm Hg) or depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 12; depth 1/3 chest diameter, epinephrine every 4 min). Six animals (sham group) underwent anesthesia and instrumentation without cardiac arrest. The primary outcomes were favorable neurologic outcome (swine Cerebral Performance Category ≤ 2) and mitochondrial maximal oxidative phosphorylation utilizing substrate for complex I and complex II (OXPHOSCI+CII) in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Measurements and Main Results: Favorable neurologic outcome was more likely with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (7/10) than depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1/12; p = 0.006). Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher intra-arrest coronary perfusion pressure, aortic pressures, and brain tissue oxygenation. Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher OXPHOSCI+CII (pmol oxygen/s × mg/citrate synthase) in the cortex (6.00 ± 0.28 vs 3.88 ± 0.43; p < 0.05) and hippocampus (6.26 ± 0.67 vs 3.55 ± 0.65; p < 0.05) and higher complex I respiration (pmol oxygen/s × mg) in the right (20.62 ± 1.06 vs 15.88 ± 0.81; p < 0.05) and left ventricles (20.14 ± 1.40 vs 14.17 ± 1.53; p < 0.05). Conclusions: In a model of asphyxia-associated pediatric cardiac arrest, hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases rates of 24-hour survival with favorable neurologic outcome, intra-arrest hemodynamics, and cerebral and myocardial mitochondrial respiration.