Liz Lenz

Prof. Liz Lenz

Kinesiology, Sports Studies, Physical Education, SUNY Brockport, Brockport, New York, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSScott Strath
Scott Strath
MGMichael J Greenwald
Michael J Greenwald
RIRaymond Isaacs
Raymond Isaacs
THTeresa L Hart
Teresa L Hart
Liz LenzLiz Lenz
Liz Lenz
ASAnn M. Swartz
Ann M. Swartz
Few studies have investigated both the self-perceived and measured environment with objectively determined physical activity in older adults. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to examine measured and perceived environmental associations with physical activity of older adults residing across different neighborhood types.

1 January 2012 in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDChristopher J Dondzila
Christopher J Dondzila
ASAnn M. Swartz
Ann M. Swartz
NMNora E Miller
Nora E Miller
Liz LenzLiz Lenz
Liz Lenz
SSScott Strath
Scott Strath
The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of uploadable pedometers to accurately count steps during treadmill (TM) and overground (OG) walking, and during a 24 hour monitoring period (24 hr) under free living conditions in young and older adults. One hundred and two participants (n=53 aged 20-49 yrs; n=49 aged 50-80 yrs) completed a TM protocol (53.6, 67.0, 80.4, 93.8, and 107.2 m/min, five minutes for each speed) and an OG walking protocol (self-determined "< normal", "normal", and "> normal" walking speeds) while wearing two waist-mounted uploadable pedometers (Omron HJ-720ITC [OM] and Kenz Lifecorder EX [LC]). Actual steps were manually tallied by a researcher. During the 24 hr period, participants wore a New Lifestyles-1000 (NL) pedometer (standard of care) attached to a belt at waist level over the midline of the left thigh, in addition to the LC on the belt over the midline of the right thigh. The following day, the same procedure was conducted, replacing the LC with the OM. One-sample t-tests were performed to compare measured and manually tallied steps during the TM and OG protocols, and between steps quantified by the NL with that of the OM and LC during the 24 hr period. Mean error step scores (MES, criterion - device) and 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) were calculated. There were no significant differences between the OM and tallied steps for any of the TM speeds for either the young or older adult groups. The LC significantly underestimated steps for the young adult group during the 53.6 m/min TM speed (MES 31.4 [14.5, 48.3]) and during the OG < normal walking speed (MES 12.0 [0.9, 23.1] (p<0.01 for both age groups). The LC also significantly underestimated steps for the older adult group during the TM speeds of 53.6 m/min (MES 64.5 [45.6, 83.4]), 67.0 m/min (MES 15.1 [6.1, 24.0]), and 80.4 m/min (MES 3.2 [0.6, 5.9]) (p<0.01 for all speeds), in addition to the OG < normal walking speed (MES 14.7 [-13.3, 42.6] (p<0.01). The OM reported significantly lower steps during the 24 hr period for the young adult group by 949.1 steps (t=6.111, p<0.025) and for the older adult group by 612.9 steps (t=2.397, p<0.025). Both the OM and LC pedometers were more accurate as TM and OG walking speed increased. The OM significantly underestimated steps during the 24 hr compared with a standard of care evaluation. Overall, both uploadable pedometers appear acceptable to use in young or old age groups to measure walking behavior.

29 April 2024 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJamie Pacenta
Jamie Pacenta
Brooke StarkoffBrooke Starkoff
Brooke Starkoff
Liz LenzLiz Lenz
Liz Lenz
ASAmanda Shearer
Amanda Shearer
Given the financial demands of attending college, the transition to new living situations, abrupt changes in social support, and overall lifestyle adjustments, college students are at an increased risk of food insecurity (FI) compared to the general population. Collegiate athletes experience an even greater risk of FI as a result of greater time commitments and energy demands associated with their sports. This heightened vulnerability poses a tremendous threat to student-athletes’ academic and athletic achievements. This study aims to address the prevalence and primary determinants of FI among collegiate athletes while providing potential solutions to navigate and alleviate the effects of diminished food security among this demographic. To address these aims, a total of 18 articles were selected from both peer-reviewed and gray literature. The U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (US-HFSSM) survey tools were predominantly utilized across universities throughout the United States to gather data on FI. Student-athletes reported experiencing FI across various regions of the United States, including universities in the northeastern states (n = 5), the southwest region (n = 3), the southeast region (n = 3), the northwest (n = 1), and the Midwest (n = 1). Overall, FI prevalence rates ranged from 9.9% to 65%, and the most significant contributors included limited financial resources, time management, meal plans, and housing location/amenities. These findings highlight a need for screening, education, and interventions to address FI among collegiate athletes.

5 April 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JPJamie Pacenta
Jamie Pacenta
Brooke StarkoffBrooke Starkoff
Brooke Starkoff
Liz LenzLiz Lenz
Liz Lenz
ASAmanda Shearer
Amanda Shearer
Given the financial demands of attending college, the transition to new living situations, abrupt changes in social support, and overall lifestyle adjustments, college students are at an increased risk of food insecurity (FI) compared to the general population. Collegiate athletes experience an even greater risk of FI as a result of greater time commitments and energy demands associated with their sports. This heightened vulnerability poses a tremendous threat to student-athletes’ academic and athletic achievements. This study aims to address the prevalence and primary determinants of FI among collegiate athletes while providing potential solutions to navigate and alleviate the effects of diminished food security among this demographic. To address these aims, a total of 18 articles were selected from both peer-reviewed and gray literature. The U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (US-HFSSM) survey tools were predominantly utilized across universities throughout the United States to gather data on FI. Student-athletes reported experiencing FI across various regions of the United States, including universities in northeastern states (n=5), the southwest region (n=3), the southeast region (n=3), the northwest (n=1), and the Midwest (n=1). Overall, FI prevalence rates ranged from 9.9% to 65% and the most significant contributors included limited financial resources, time management, meal plans, and housing location/amenities. These findings highlight a need for screening, education, and intervention to address FI among collegiate athletes.

1 May 2016 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Liz LenzLiz Lenz
Liz Lenz
Brooke StarkoffBrooke Starkoff
Brooke Starkoff
LLLauren J. Lieberman
Lauren J. Lieberman
JFJohn Foley
John Foley
DTDanny Too
Danny Too