Daniel S Childs

Dr. Daniel S Childs

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2013 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJeremy Day
Jeremy Day
DCDaniel S Childs
Daniel S Childs
MGMikael C Guzman-Karlsson
Mikael C Guzman-Karlsson
MKMercy Kibe
Mercy Kibe
JMJerome Moulden
Jerome Moulden
JSJ David Sweatt
J David Sweatt
This study shows that associative reward learning produces dynamic experience-dependent alterations in DNA methylation and immediate-early gene expression in ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons and that DNA methylation in the VTA is required for the formation of new reward-related memories. Reward-related memories are essential for adaptive behavior and evolutionary fitness, but they are also a core component of maladaptive brain diseases such as addiction. Reward learning requires dopamine neurons located in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which encode relationships between predictive cues and future rewards. Recent evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, are essential regulators of neuronal plasticity and experience-driven behavioral change. However, the role of epigenetic mechanisms in reward learning is poorly understood. Here we show that the formation of reward-related associative memories in rats upregulates key plasticity genes in the VTA, which are correlated with memory strength and associated with gene-specific changes in DNA methylation. Moreover, DNA methylation in the VTA is required for the formation of stimulus-reward associations. These results provide the first evidence that that activity-dependent methylation and demethylation of DNA is an essential substrate for the behavioral and neuronal plasticity driven by reward-related experiences.

1 September 2021 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDaniel Hertz
Daniel Hertz
DCDaniel S Childs
Daniel S Childs
SPSusanna B. Park
Susanna B. Park
SFSara Faithfull
Sara Faithfull
YKYu Ke
Yu Ke
MLMaryam Lustberg
Maryam Lustberg

1 May 2026 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAndrew J Armstrong
Andrew J Armstrong
MMMichael J Morris
Michael J Morris
WAWassim Abida
Wassim Abida
RARahul Aggarwal
Rahul Aggarwal
Emmanuel S. AntonarakisEmmanuel S. Antonarakis
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
PGPCWG4 Writing Group
PCWG4 Writing Group
PURPOSE: The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods: We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS: PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION: PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.

30 November 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
COChris Olsen
Chris Olsen
DCDaniel S Childs
Daniel S Childs
GSGregg D Stanwood
Gregg D Stanwood
DWDanny G Winder
Danny G Winder
Pharmacological and genetic studies have suggested that the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is critically involved in mediating the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse, but not food. The purpose of this study was to use mGluR5 knockout (KO), heterozygous (Het), and wildtype (WT) mice to determine if mGluR5 modulates operant sensation seeking (OSS), an operant task that uses varied sensory stimuli as a reinforcer. We found that mGluR5 KO mice had significantly reduced OSS responding relative to WT mice, while Het mice displayed a paradoxical increase in OSS responding. Neither KO nor Het mice exhibited altered operant responding for food as a reinforcer. Further, we assessed mGluR5 KO, Het and WT mice across a battery of cocaine locomotor, place preference and anxiety related tests. Although KO mice showed expected differences in some locomotor and anxiety measures, Het mice either exhibited no phenotype or an intermediate one. In total, these data demonstrate a key role for mGluR5 in OSS, indicating an important role for this receptor in reinforcement-based behavior.

1 January 2019 in Annals of Palliative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniel S Childs
Daniel S Childs
AJAminah Jatoi
Aminah Jatoi
Cancer-associated anorexia, or loss of appetite, is prevalent, distressing to patients and their families, and associated with poorer outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. A well-defined therapeutic strategy remains to be defined. We present here a review of appetite loss in cancer patients with a summary of how best to manage this symptom.

30 April 2024 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMiguel Muniz
Miguel Muniz
CLCharles Lawrence Loprinzi
Charles Lawrence Loprinzi
JOJacob Orme
Jacob Orme
RKRegina M Koch
Regina M Koch
AMAhmed Mahmoud
Ahmed Mahmoud
DCDaniel S Childs
Daniel S Childs