Daniel D Eun

Dr. Daniel D Eun

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZiho Lee
Ziho Lee
BMBlake Moore
Blake Moore
LGLaura Giusto
Laura Giusto
DEDaniel D Eun
Daniel D Eun

1 June 2022 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAlessandro Veccia
Alessandro Veccia
UCUmberto Carbonara
Umberto Carbonara
HDHooman Djaladat
Hooman Djaladat
RMReza Mehrazin
Reza Mehrazin
DEDaniel D Eun
Daniel D Eun
RARiccardo Autorino
Riccardo Autorino
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RRNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) within a large multi-institutional worldwide dataset. Materials and Methods: The ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) includes data from 17 centers worldwide regarding 877 RRNU and LRNU performed between 2015 and 2019. Baseline features, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, were included. A 2:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching with a 0.001 caliper was performed. A univariable and a multivariable logistic regression model were built to evaluate the predictors of a composite “tetrafecta” outcome defined as occurrence of bladder cuff excision+LND+no complications+negative surgical margins. Results: After matching, 185 RRNU and 91 LRNU were assessed. Patients in the RRNU group were more likely to undergo bladder cuff excision (81.9% vs 63.7%; p < 0.001) compared to the LRNU group. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of overall postoperative complications ( p = 0.003) and length of stay ( p < 0.001) in favor of RRNU. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LRNU was an independent predictor negatively associated with achievement of “tetrafecta” (odds ratio: 0.09; p = 0.003). Conclusions: In general, RRNU and LRNU offer comparable outcomes. While the rate of overall complications is higher for LRNU in this study population, this is mostly related to low-grade complications, and therefore with more limited clinical relevance. RRNU seems to offer shorter hospital stay, but this might also be related to the different geographical location of participating centers. Overall, the implementation of robotics might facilitate achievement of a “tetrafecta” outcome as defined in the present study.

1 May 2021 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UCUmberto Carbonara
Umberto Carbonara
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
AMAndrea Minervini
Andrea Minervini
CSChandru P. Sundaram
Chandru P. Sundaram
ALAlessandro Larcher
Alessandro Larcher
RARiccardo Autorino
Riccardo Autorino

1 May 2016 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZiho Lee
Ziho Lee
JKJoshua Kaplan
Joshua Kaplan
LGLaura Giusto
Laura Giusto
DEDaniel D Eun
Daniel D Eun

1 December 2022 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KOKennedy E. Okhawere
Kennedy E. Okhawere
ABAlp Tuna Beksac
Alp Tuna Beksac
MWMichael P. Wilson
Michael P. Wilson
TKTalia G. Korn
Talia G. Korn
KMKirolos N. Meilika
Kirolos N. Meilika
KBKetan K. Badani
Ketan K. Badani
Purpose Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a new technology and early in its adoption curve. The goal of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of single port (SP) to multi-port (MP) robotic technology for partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods This is a prospective cohort study of patients who have undergone robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using SP and MP technology. Baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor-specific characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ 2, T-test and Mann-Whitney U test in the overall cohort and in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results After propensity matching, 146 SP patients were matched with 146 MP patients. Single port and multiport groups had similar mean age (58 ± 12 years vs. 59 ± 12 years; p =0.606) and proportion of males (54.11% vs. 52.05%; p=0.725). The SP had a longer mean ischemia (18.29 ± 10.49mins vs. 13.79 ± 6.29mins; p <0.001). Estimated blood loss and Length of stay, operative time, positive margin rate and any complication rate were similar between the two groups. Conclusions SP partial nephrectomy had a longer ischemia time, and a comparable LOS, EBL, operative time, positive margin rates and complication rates to multi-port. This early data is encouraging. However, the role of SP requires further study and should evaluate safety and long-term data when compared to the standard multi-port technique.

1 February 2013 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZiho Lee
Ziho Lee
RCRonald Cadillo-Chavez
Ronald Cadillo-Chavez
DLDavid I. Lee
David I. Lee
ELElton Llukani
Elton Llukani
DEDaniel D Eun
Daniel D Eun
Purpose: To describe a novel technique for a single setup approach for robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) that does not require patient repositioning, port reassignment, or redocking of the robotic arms. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients underwent RANU at a single institution between January 2009 and January 2012. We implemented a unique port placement strategy based on a modified paramedian line (MPL), which allowed sufficient access to both the upper abdomen and the deep pelvis for radical NU with bladder cuff excision and concomitant lymphadenectomy. Results: The mean operative time was 161.3 minutes (range 91–330 minutes), mean estimated blood loss was 98.8 (range 50–200), and the mean hospital stay was 3 days (median 2 days, range 1–16 days). None of the procedures were converted to open or required blood transfusions. Lymphadenectomy was performed on 16 out of 20 patients, and the mean number of lymph nodes removed per patient when lymphadenectomy was performed was 14.1 (range 2–35). Three patients had positive lymph nodes. One patient had prolonged postoperative ileus, and one had a hospital course that was complicated by pneumonia. Mean patient follow-up was 13.5 months (range 1–24 months); one patient was found to have a recurrence at 3 month follow-up. Conclusion: The use of our MPL line for novel port placement allows for an effective, efficient, and reproducible method for RANU without the need for repositioning of the patient or the robot.