This article presents the results of computational studies investigating the ignition of high-pressure natural gas jets in a compression-ignition engine with glow plug ignition assist. The simulation was conducted using a KIVA-3V-based three-dimensional engine model, along with an improved fuel injector model, a detailed cut-off glow plug shield model and a modified two-step methane reaction mechanism, to simulate the natural gas injection and ignition. The simulated results demonstrate the significance of using a shield for the glow plug. Compared to an unshielded (bare) glow plug, the shield not only reduces the heat loss from the hot glow plug surface to the cold intake air charge and the cold injected gas jet but also traps the fuel mixture to increase its residence time adjacent to the hot surface. Over a representative range of heavy-duty diesel engine operating conditions, a shielded glow plug greatly improves the natural gas engine performance and provides reliable ignition, while an unshielded glow plug can only be optimized for specific conditions. The understanding of glow plug shield behavior gained from the simulations suggests avenues for improved shield designs that would yield further reduced ignition delays.

The results of a previous study, part 1, showed that use of a shield can improve the thermal performance of a glow plug, and thereby reduce ignition time. However, the part 1 study also found that use of a simple shield with only one circular opening can delay flame propagation out of the shield. The conclusions of that study suggested that there is scope for further improvements of the shield design, especially the shield opening geometry. Accordingly, this article presents the results of computational studies investigating the influence of multi-opening shield designs on natural gas ignition characteristics in glow plug–assisted compression–ignition engines. Two types of multi-opening glow plug shield, consisting of four small circular openings distributed in either diamond-pattern or square-pattern arrangements, were employed. The simulated results demonstrated that both multi-opening shields can not only increase glow plug surface temperature, but also increase the residence time of fuel mixture adjacent to the glow plug surface in the early injection stage, resulting in a faster ignition than the single-opening shield. Furthermore, the diamond-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield provides a faster or comparable flame propagation path back to combustion chamber, compared to single-opening glow plug shield, while the square-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield delays the flame propagation under several specific engine conditions. Compared to the single-opening glow plug shield, the overall natural gas ignition delays are further reduced by 6%–44% when using the diamond-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield, while the square-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield is only able to reduce the natural gas ignition delay under a few specific conditions.