Justin A Steggerda

Dr. Justin A Steggerda

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTing Liu
Ting Liu
HYHeping Yang
Heping Yang
WFWei Fan
Wei Fan
JTJian Tu
Jian Tu
TLTony W.H. Li
Tony W.H. Li
SLShelly Lu
Shelly Lu
MAF bZIP transcription factor G (MAFG) is activated by the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) to repress bile acid synthesis. However, expression of MAFG increases during cholestatic liver injury in mice and in cholangiocarcinomas. MAFG interacts directly with methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) and other transcription factors at the E-box element to repress transcription. We studied mechanisms of MAFG upregulation in cholestatic tissues and the pathways by which S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prevent the increase in MAFG expression. We also investigated whether obeticholic acid (OCA), an FXR agonist, affects MAFG expression and how it contributes to tumor growth in mice. We obtained 7 human cholangiocarcinoma specimens and adjacent non-tumor tissues from patients that underwent surgical resection in California and 113 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens and adjacent non-tumor tissues from China, along with clinical data from patients. Tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. MAT1A, MAT2A, c-MYC, and MAFG were overexpressed or knocked down with small interfering RNAs in MzChA-1, KMCH, Hep3B, and HepG2 cells; some cells were incubated with lithocholic acid (LCA, which causes the same changes in gene expression observed during chronic cholestatic liver injury in mice), SAMe, UDCA (100 μM), or FXR agonists. MAFG expression and promoter activity were measured using real-time PCR, immunoblot, and transient transfection. We performed electrophoretic mobility shift, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to study proteins that occupy promoter regions. We studied mice with bile-duct ligation, orthotopic cholangiocarcinomas, cholestasis-induced cholangiocarcinoma, diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumors, and xenograft tumors. LCA activated expression of MAFG in HepG2 and MzChA-1 cells, which required the AP-1, NF-κB, and E-box sites in the MAFG promoter. LCA reduced expression of MAT1A but increased expression of MAT2A in cells. Overexpression of MAT2A increased activity of the MAFG promoter whereas knockdown of MAT2A reduced it; MAT1A and MAT2A had opposite effects on the AP-1, NF-κB, and E-box–mediated promoter activity. Expression of MAFG and MAT2A increased, and expression of MAT1A decreased, in diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumors in mice. SAMe and UDCA had shared and distinct mechanisms of preventing LCA-mediated increased expression of MAFG. OCA increased expression of MAFG, MAT2A, and c-MYC but reduced expression of MAT1A. Incubation of human liver and biliary cancer cells lines with OCA promoted their proliferation; in nude mice given OCA, xenograft tumors were larger than in mice given vehicle. Levels of MAFG were increased in human HCC and cholangiocarcinoma tissues compared with non-tumor tissues. High levels of MAFG in HCC samples correlated with hepatitis B, vascular invasion, and shorter survival times of patients. Expression of MAFG increases in cells and tissues with cholestasis, as well as in human cholangiocarcinoma and HCC specimens; high expression levels correlate with tumor progression and reduced survival time. SAMe and UDCA reduce expression of MAFG in response to cholestasis, by shared and distinct mechanisms. OCA induces MAFG expression, cancer cell proliferation, and growth of xenograft tumors in mice.

8 November 2024 in Transplantation Direct
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SWSteven A Wisel
Steven A Wisel
JSJustin A Steggerda
Justin A Steggerda
IKIrene K. Kim
Irene K. Kim
Background.: Adoption of machine perfusion (MP) technology has rapidly expanded in liver transplantation without real-world data on utilization and outcomes, which are critical to understand the appropriate application of MP technology. Methods.: The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database was used to identify all deceased donor livers procured with intent for transplant between October 27, 2015 (date of first recorded MP) and June 30, 2023 (n = 67 795). Liver allografts were cohorted by donation after brain death (DBD; n = 59 957) or circulatory death (DCD; n = 7873) and analyzed by static cold storage (SCS) or MP preservation method. Donor demographics, organ utilization, and graft survival were evaluated. Results.: By 2023, 12.5% of all livers and 37.2% of DCD livers underwent MP preservation (82.6% normothermic, 6.7% hypothermic, and 10.8% other/unknown). Compared with SCS, MP liver donors were older (DBD: 48 versus 40 y [P < 0.001]; DCD: 43 versus 38 y [P < 0.001]) with higher body mass index (DBD: 28.8 versus 26.9 kg/m2 [P < 0.001]; DCD: 27.7 versus 26.9 kg/m2 [P = 0.004]). Donor livers had similar levels of macrosteatosis (median 5%). Graft utilization was higher for MP than SCS after DBD (96.4% versus 93.0%, P < 0.001) and DCD (91.4% versus 70.3%, P < 0.001) donation. Graft survival was similar between MP and SCS livers from DBD donors (P = 0.516), whereas MP-preserved grafts had superior survival from DCD donors at 1 and 3 y posttransplant (P = 0.013 and 0.037). Patient survival was similar across all groups at 3 y (P = 0.322). Conclusions.: The use of MP in liver transplantation increased rates of liver utilization and improved graft survival after DCD. Further monitoring of MP outcomes is required to understand long-term benefits.

27 March 2022 in Pediatric Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJustin A Steggerda
Justin A Steggerda
HPHelen Pizzo
Helen Pizzo
JGJonathan Garrison
Jonathan Garrison
XZXiaohai Zhang
Xiaohai Zhang
MHMark Haas
Mark Haas
DPDechu P. Puliyanda
Dechu P. Puliyanda

2 April 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJustin A Steggerda
Justin A Steggerda
MBMatthew B Bloom
Matthew B Bloom
MNMazen Noureddin
Mazen Noureddin
TBTodd V Brennan
Todd V Brennan
TTTsuyoshi Todo
Tsuyoshi Todo
IKIrene K Kim
Irene K Kim
Historically, liver allografts with >30% macrosteatosis (MaS) on donor biopsy have been associated with early allograft dysfunction and worse graft survival; however, successful outcomes have been reported in small cohorts. This study proposes an elevated MaS threshold for organ utilization without detriment to graft survival. The UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database was evaluated for transplants between 2006–2015. Graft survival up to 1-year was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses, and by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, including donor and recipient characteristics. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of graft loss are reported. Thirty-day risk of graft loss was increased with MaS as low as 10–19% (OR [95% CI] 1.301 [1.055–1.605], p<0.0001) and peaked with MaS 50–59% (2.921 [1.672–5.103]). At 1-year, risk of graft loss remained elevated with MaS 40–49% (1.465 [1.002–2.142]) and MaS 50–59% (1.978 [1.281–3.056], p = 0.0224). Multivariable models were created for Lower and Higher MELD recipients and MaS cutoffs were established. In Lower MELD recipients, organs with ≥50% MaS had increased risk of graft loss at 30 days (2.451 [1.541–3.897], p = 0.0008) and 1-year post-transplant (1.720 [1.224–2.418], p = 0.0125). Higher MELD recipients had increased risk of graft loss at 30 days with allografts showing MaS ≥40% (4.204 [1.440–5.076], p = 0.0016). At 1-year the risk remained increased, but MaS was not significant predictor of graft loss.048 [1.131–3.710], p = 0.0616). In both MELD cohorts, organs with MaS levels below threshold had similar survival to those transplanted without a donor biopsy. In conjunction with recipient selection, organs with MaS up to 50% may be safely used without detriment to outcomes.

22 June 2023 in Hepatology Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BYBing Yang
Bing Yang
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
JWJiaohong Wang
Jiaohong Wang
WFWei Fan
Wei Fan
LTLucía Barbier Torres
Lucía Barbier Torres
HYHeping Yang
Heping Yang
Background: We established a novel diethylnitrosamine (DEN) -induced mouse model that reflected the progression of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) from atypical cystic hyperplasia. Methods: BALB/c mice were administered DEN by oral gavage. Cells isolated from livers were analyzed for expression of CSNK2A1, MAX and MAX-interacting proteins. Human CCA cell lines (MzChA-1, HuCCT1), normal human cholangiocyte (H69), human hepatic stellate cells (LX-2), macrophages (RAW 264.7), and primary hepatic cells were used for cellular and molecular biology assays. Results: Expression of MAX, CSNK2A1, C-MYC, β-catenin, HMGB1, and IL-6 was upregulated in hepatic cells from CCA liver tissue. The half-life of MAX is higher in CCA cells, and this favors their proliferation. Overexpression of MAX increased growth, migration, and invasion of MzChA-1, whereas silencing of MAX had the opposite effect. MAX positively regulated IL-6 and HMGB1 through paracrine signaling in HepG2, LX2, and RAW cells and autocrine signaling in MzChA-1 cells. CSNK2A1-mediated MAX phosphorylation shifts MAX-MAX homodimer to C-MYC-MAX and β-catenin-MAX heterodimers and increases the HMGB1 and IL-6 promoter activities. Increase of MAX phosphorylation promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cholangiocarcinogenesis. The casein kinase 2 inhibitor CX-4945 induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and carcinogenesis in MzChA-1 cells through the downregulation of CSNK2A1, MAX, and MAX-interaction proteins. Conclusion: C-MYC-MAX and β-catenin-MAX binding to E-box site or β-catenin-MAX bound to TCFs/LEF1 enhanced HMGB1 or IL-6 promoter activities, respectively. IL-6 and HMGB1 secreted by hepatocytes, HSCs, and KCs exert paracrine effects on cholangiocytes to promote cell growth, migration, and invasion and lead to the progression of cholangiocarcinogenesis. CX-4945 provides perspectives on therapeutic strategies to attenuate progression from atypical cystic hyperplasia to cholangiocarcinogenesis. The schematic diagram shows a novel cross talk between MYC-associated factor X (MAX) and CSNK2A1, C-MYC, β-catenin, high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), and IL-6 in CCA. On the one hand, CSNK2A1 activates and CX-4945 inhibit MAX phosphorylation. The former leads to shift of MAX-MAX homodimer to MAX-C-MYC/MAX-β-catenin heterodimers and promotes HMGB1 transcription in MzChA-1 cell. On the other hand, high expression of CSNK2A1 and MAX in hepatocytes, KCs, and HSCs and cholangiocytes in liver tissues with CCA leads to increase in MAX phosphorylation and promotes paracrine and autocrine signaling of HMGB1 and IL-6. HMGB1 and IL-6 can regulate the occurrence of biliary proliferation, atypical hyperplasia, cholangiomas, and CCA. Export

1 January 2019 in Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJustin A Steggerda
Justin A Steggerda
IKIrene K. Kim
Irene K. Kim
DMDarren Malinoski
Darren Malinoski
AKAndrew S. Klein
Andrew S. Klein
MBMatthew B. Bloom
Matthew B. Bloom
Background: Obesity, defined as a high body mass index (hBMI) of 30 kg/m2 or greater, is a growing epidemic worldwide and is associated with multiple comorbidities. High BMI individuals account for an increasing portion of potential liver donors. Here we evaluate trends in the utilization and outcomes of hBMI donors on a national and regional level and the potential role of liver biopsy in donor evaluation. Methods: United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database was evaluated for deceased donor liver transplants between 2006 and 2016 across 11 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions. High BMI donors were compared with lower BMI counterparts and evaluated for biopsy rates, utilization rates and allograft outcomes. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: Seventy-seven thousand fifty potential donors were identified and 60 200 transplants were evaluated. Utilization rates for hBMI donors were 66.1% versus 78.1% for lower BMI donors (P < 0.001). Pretransplant biopsy was performed more frequently in hBMI donors (52.1% vs 33.1%, P < 0.001) and macrosteatosis of 30% or greater was identified more often (21.1% vs 12.2%, P < 0.001). Biopsy performance increased utilization rate of hBMI donors in 7 of 11 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions. region 6 showed the highest rate of biopsy performance, high rate of hBMI donor utilization, and highest 5-year estimated graft survival rates of all regions. Conclusions: High BMI donors have not previously been associated with worse graft survival in multivariable analyses; however, they are used much less frequently. Liver biopsy may increase the utilization rate of hBMI donors and improve donor selection. Further evaluation of regions with high rates of utilization and good outcomes is warranted.