Background: Dermatology in healthcare is changed by technological advancements, patient awareness, and developing healthcare needs. In Saudi Arabia, choosing a dermatologist is influenced by various factors, including patient satisfaction, digital technology use, and the physician’s characteristics and qualities. Purpose: The major aim of this research was to evaluate factors influencing patients’ choice of dermatologists in Saudi Arabia, including past experiences, reputation, social media influence, and access to care. Methods: A comprehensive national survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia. The research included 1038 participants using stratified sampling, predominantly from the 18–25 age group (67.1%). The distribution covered all regions of Saudi Arabia, with a larger portion from the Central and Western regions. The survey included quantitative and qualitative questions, assessing factors such as previous experiences with dermatologists, the importance of physician reputation, the role of digital platforms, and access to care. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS 22; IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA), with continuous variables expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as percentages. Results: Our study highlighted a strong preference for dermatologists based on previous positive experiences (95.3%) and reputable dermatologists (95.2%). Factors like social media presence were less influential. Demographics matter, with younger and female participants favoring female doctors. The education level affects preference factors like ads, and the convenience of their location holds minimal sway. Recommendations from peers and healthcare professionals carry significant weight in the decision. Conclusions: Positive patient experiences and professional reputation suggest that these are the factors that affect patients’ selection of a dermatologist the most. The research findings indicated that while digital platforms are important for information dissemination, they play a minimal role in the actual selection process. The findings can guide dermatologists and healthcare policymakers in enhancing patient-centered care and adapting to evolving patient preferences in the digital age.

Background Burn is a skin injury that results in the death of the impacted cells. Burn injuries are frequently unintentional and very avoidable. With proper management, the outcome is improved, and the need for surgical intervention is reduced. This article discusses healthcare providers' knowledge and practice of burn first aid and management to highlight the need for the enhanced practice of burn management and first-aid skills. Objective This study aims to assess the knowledge and practice of burn injuries management among healthcare workers in different specialties in Hail city. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted via an interviewer-administrated face-to-face questionnaire and video recording of a simulated case of burn injury collected from our skill lab at Hail University and evaluated by a board-certified plastic surgeon. Result The study analyzed 119 physicians (mean age = 36.3 years, SD = 6.7) managing burn cases. Of these, 59.7% were male, and 40.3% were female. The mean evaluation score was 7.71 (SD = 2.84). None of the factors studied, including gender (p = 0.353), age (p = 0.970), education level (p = 0.127), specialty (p = 0.871), professional experience (p = 0.118), working sector (p = 0.178), nationality (p = 0.742), or participation in burn management course (p = 0.131), had a significant effect on burn management skills of physicians. However, some groups had higher mean evaluation scores than others. Further research is needed to explore potential reasons for the observed differences in mean evaluation scores among different groups of physicians. Conclusion We discovered that most physicians were found to have poor practical knowledge of proper burn management, and most of them had not engaged in a burn first aid training, therefore more courses targeting physicians who may meet burn patients are required.

A methodical approach to health services called “quality of care” places an emphasis on both interpersonal and technical competence in the delivery of medical care. One of the key elements of high-quality care is the client's or patient's satisfaction, which includes treating them with respect, being aware of their needs, and meeting those needs. Dermatologists are forced to expand service availability and respond to patients' needs and desires as required through satisfaction surveys as a result of an increase in the number of insured patients and demand for services. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia to measure patient satisfaction with the medical care provided to patients in dermatology clinics affiliated with the government and private hospitals by recording the responses received from a questionnaire assessing the doctor’s attitude, such as whether the dermatologist was punctual and had the patient’s medical records. The modified Arabic language digitally administered questionnaire with 17 closed-ended items was used to collect data from respondents. In total, 1002 patients, including 70.76% females and 29.24% males, participated in the study; 83.33% of patients visited a dermatology clinic of which 74.61% visited private clinics, and the disease had already developed in 64.55% of patients. A 5-point Likert scale with six statements was used to measure patient satisfaction with the visiting doctor. Overall, the mean score was very high (4.41 ± 0.92). According to the results of this study, respect for patients’ wishes, emotional support, and physical comfort appear to be the most crucial factors in determining patient happiness. Healthcare systems should strive to achieve a balance in services that not only offer clinically effective care but are also perceived by the patients as acceptable and beneficial. This is true regardless of demographic status.