Using orthopedic devices or prosthetic joints to treat various conditions is expected in a Traumatology and Orthopedics Unit. Recently, the materials used to build these different devices have evolved; however, pathogens can still infect these materials. Additionally, the immune system has limitations when defending against these pathogens, which results in bacterial infections like Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A total of 276 patients who attended the Traumatology and Orthopedics Unit of our hospital from 1 June 2018 to 1 June 2019, were included in the present study. Our study analyzed the incidence of S. aureus and other bacterial pathogens in the surgical sites of patients with orthopedic implants, as well as the most used types of implants and implant materials. The specimens obtained from the surgical sites of the patients were cultured in anaerobic and aerobic media for subsequent identification using their phenotypic characteristics. Subsequently, antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed to establish the appropriate treatment. The primary pathogens identified were Staphylococcus aureus (26.4%), followed by Escherichia coli (21.0%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (15.8%). The most commonly used implants were plates (41.7%), followed by endomedullary nails (20%), Kirschner wires (14.1%), and fixators (10.1%). As for the anatomical regions of the implants, the most frequent sites were the legs, followed by the thighs, wrists, and ankles. The pathogens were more susceptible to ciprofloxacin (95%), clindamycin (89%), and cefotaxime (86%). S. aureus is the primary infectious agent in our hospital, with an incidence of 26.4% after the placement of orthopedic implants. Although its incidence was lower compared to other tertiary hospitals, it is necessary to improve aseptic techniques in such a way as to reduce the incidence of this pathogen further.

Orthopedic emergencies due to fractures are one of the main reasons for surgical intervention. The distal radius is a structure prone to fractures, particularly in young people. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the success rate of methoxyflurane in the reduction in distal radius fractures that required conservative treatment. The medical records of all the patients with Frykman type I and type II distal radius fractures who underwent fracture reduction with methoxyflurane or propofol from December 2021 to January 2023 were reviewed. The success rate of distal radius fracture reduction with methoxyflurane was analyzed, and the secondary outcomes, such as the recovery time and length of stay in the orthopedic emergency department, were assessed and compared with propofol. A total of 145 patients with distal radius fractures presented to the emergency department during the study period. Seventy-five patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifty patients had a fracture reduction with methoxyflurane, while twenty patients received propofol. The median recovery time and reduction duration were 30 min and 65.5 min, respectively, resulting in a shorter period for the methoxyflurane group. Methoxyflurane was successfully used in 48 of the 82 patients undergoing Frykman type I and type II distal radius fracture reduction while improving the recovery time due to its easy self-delivery and rapid effectiveness in the patient, as well as being able to estimate the level of pain so that the amount of anesthetic needed can be estimated and adverse effects avoided. Methoxyflurane represents a great candidate for surgical interventions like the reduction in distal radius fractures.