Marwa M Esawy

Dr. Marwa M Esawy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2020 in Current Problems in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
KAKhalid M. Abdel-Samd
Khalid M. Abdel-Samd

1 November 2019 in Immunobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarwa Shabana
Marwa Shabana
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
NINagwan A. Ismail
Nagwan A. Ismail
ASAhmed M. Said
Ahmed M. Said

30 January 2020 in Clinical Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
WMWafaa K. Makram
Wafaa K. Makram
WAWaleed Albalat
Waleed Albalat
MSMarwa Shabana
Marwa Shabana

1 December 2018 in Immunobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBShereen A. Baioumy
Shereen A. Baioumy
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
MSMarwa A. Shabana
Marwa A. Shabana

19 June 2020 in The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNoha Ali Hashim
Noha Ali Hashim
HFHala Ahmed Fathy
Hala Ahmed Fathy
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
MSMarwa Ahmed Shabana
Marwa Ahmed Shabana
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve as it traverses the wrist at the carpal tunnel.Objectives: To compare the effect of single dose of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injected locally with that of corticosteroid in patients with CTS.Subjects and methods: A total of 60 patients with very mild to moderate unilateral CTS were recruited to the study. PRP was prepared via two centrifugation procedures. The patients were randomly divided into three groups PRP [i] group, PRP [ii] group, and a third group that received local corticosteroid injection (CS). The patients were followed up at 1.5 and 3 months by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. The severity and functional outcomes were evaluated through Boston CTS, and neurophysiological analyses were carried out.Results: On comparing the PRP [i], PRP [ii], and CS groups, a statistically significant enhancement of all outcome variables was observed in both PRP groups at follow-up except VAS at 3 and 6 months (P= 0.073 andP= 0.068, respectively) in PRP [ii] group.Conclusion: In CTS, PRP was a better treatment alternative with respect to pain and functional outcome. In addition, it was associated well with improved neurophysiological values than those observed after corticosteroid injection.Trial registration: Zagazig University, ZU-IRB#5014. Registered 18 December 2018, http://www.IRB_123@medicine.zu.edu.eg. ISRCTN Registry,ISRCTN16755281; 20 March 2020

1 August 2019 in Clinica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MEMarwa M Esawy
Marwa M Esawy
MSMarwa A. Shabana
Marwa A. Shabana
MMMahmoud M. Magdy
Mahmoud M. Magdy