Background: Early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TKP) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is thought to have a worse visual prognosis than the delayed optical penetrating keratoplasty (OKP) after successful conservative treatment of AK. This has led to a tendency to prolong conservative therapy and delay penetrating keratoplasty in patients with AK. This retrospective series presents the results of patients with AK that underwent early penetrating keratoplasty after reducing the corneal amoeba load through intensive conservative therapy, so-called “low load keratoplasty” (LLKP). Patients and methods: The medical records of our department were screened for patients with AK, confirmed by histological examination and/or PCR and/or in vivo confocal microscopy, which underwent ab LLKP and had a follow-up time of at least one year between 2009 and 2023. Demographic data, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure at first and last visit, secondary glaucoma (SG), and recurrence and graft survival rates were assessed. Results: 28 eyes of 28 patients were included. The average time from initiation of therapy to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was 68 ± 113 days. The mean follow-up time after LLKP was 53 ± 42 months. BCVA (logMAR) improved from 1.9 ± 1 pre-operatively to 0.5 ± 0.6 at last visit (p < 0.001). A total of 14% of patients were under medical therapy for SG at the last visit, and two of them underwent glaucoma surgery. The recurrence rate was 4%. The Kaplan–Meier graft survival rate of the first graft at four years was 70%. The second graft survival rate at four years was 87.5%. Conclusion: LLKP appears to achieve a good visual prognosis with an earlier visual and psychological habilitation, as well as low recurrence and SG rates. These results should encourage us to reconsider the optimal timing of PKP in therapy-resistant AK.

To compare prevalence of positive PCR tests for herpesviruses between patients with and without a history of clinical corneal endothelial allograft rejection (AGR). Retrospective cross‐sectional study with two‐group comparison. A total of 307 aqueous humor (AH) samples from 235 Patients and 244 eyes who underwent penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty or had a diagnostic AH aspiration due to clinical AGR between 2019 and 2023 were tested for DNA of herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella‐zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV). PCR test results were compared between the two groups (with/without AGR). Another sub‐analysis examined the results of patients without a history of herpetic keratitis. A total of 8% of eyes with clinical AGR (9/108) had a positive PCR result for one of the herpesviruses (HSV:3, CMV:3, EBV:2, VZV:1). All patients in the group without AGR had negative PCR results for all previous viruses (0/136). The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The sub‐analysis of eyes without a history of herpetic keratitis also revealed significantly more positive herpes PCR results (7/87) in eyes with AGR than in eyes without AGR (0/42, p = 0.005). Clinical AGR after keratoplasty shows a significant correlation to viral replication. Herpetic infection and AGR could occur simultaneously and act synergistically. Timely differentiation between active herpetic infection and/or AGR is pivotal for proper treatment and graft preservation.

Purpose: To compare the effects of monotherapy with intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab on retinal ganglion cell layer (RGCL) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) in patients with naïve neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD).Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with three‐groups comparison. 83 patients and 97 eyes on continuous monotherapy with an intravitreal anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) were followed for 24 months and divided into three groups according to anti‐VEGF (aflibercept: 25 eyes, ranibizumab: 34 eyes, bevacizumab: 38 eyes). Main outcome measures included: RGCL and RNFL thickness, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), macular volume (MV) and the presence of intraretinal fluids (IRF), subretinal fluids (SRF) and retinal pigment epithelial atrophy (RPE‐atrophy). All outcome measures were recorded at the time of the first injection, 1 and 2 years after treatment and compared longitudinally and between groups.Results: The mean age was 79 ± 7 years. The RGCL thickness, MV, CMT and the presence of IRF and SRF decreased significantly within all three medication groups (p < 0.05 for all) with no significant difference between groups over the 2‐year follow‐up period (p > 0.10 for all). The decrease in RNFL thickness was not significant within or between the groups after a 2‐year follow‐up (p > 0.055 for all). RPE‐atrophy increased significantly after 2 years in all three groups (p < 0.028 for all) with no significant difference between groups at all three time points (p > 0.307 for all). BCVA was comparable between the three groups over the 2‐year follow‐up period (p > 0.22 for all).Conclusions: Monotherapy with intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab was associated with comparable significant decreases in RGCL thickness, CMT, MV, IRF and SRF in naïve nAMD patients during the first 2 years of treatment. Furthermore, no significant differences either in BCVA or RNFL thickness were observed between the three intravitreal anti‐VEFGs during the first 2 years of treatment.

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops (NSAIDs) combined with oral acetazolamide for postoperative macular edema (PME) after uncomplicated phacoemulsification (PE) and identify predictors of non-response. Methods: We analyzed data of uncomplicated PE and identified eyes with PME. First-line therapy included topical NSAIDs combined with oral acetazolamide. In the case of non-response, triamcinolone was administered subtenonally. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: 94 eyes out of 9750 uncomplicated PE developed PME, of which 60 eyes were included. Follow-ups occurred 6.4 ± 1.8, 12.5 ± 3.7 and 18.6 ± 6.0 weeks after diagnosis. BCVA and CMT improved significantly in all follow-ups. In total, 40 eyes showed a response to first-line therapy at the first follow-up (G1). The remaining 20 eyes showed no response and required subtenon triamcinolone (G2), of which 11 eyes showed complete regression at the second follow-up and 4 eyes at third follow-up. A further 5 eyes showed no response and required intravitreal injection. Multivariate linear regression model showed that Diabetes mellitus (DM) and increased cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) are predictors of non-response. Conclusion: Topical NSAIDs with acetazolamide resulted in complete regression of PME in 67% of all cases. DM and increased CDE might be considered as predictors of non-response to this treatment.

Acanthamoebic keratitis (AK) is a sight-threatening infectious keratitis caused by Acanthamoeba. Timely and appropriate conservative treatment of AK can lead to a cure of the keratitis with good visual acuity, without the need for keratoplasty in the further course of the disease. In treatment-resistant cases, keratoplasty after intensive anti-amoebic therapy (AAT), so-called “low-load keratoplasty”, appears to offer a better overall prognosis and earlier visual and psychological rehabilitation than actively delayed keratoplasty (optical/therapeutic). Further studies directly comparing early and delayed keratoplasty are needed to even better determine the optimal timing of corneal transplantation in AK.