Frank Porreca

Prof. Frank Porreca

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2021 in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLee S. Simon
Lee S. Simon
PTPeter C. Taylor
Peter C. Taylor
ECErnest H. Choy
Ernest H. Choy
ASAnthony Sebba
Anthony Sebba
AQAmanda Quebe
Amanda Quebe
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca
Pain is a manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is mediated by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms and negatively affects quality of life. Recent findings from a Phase 3 clinical trial showed that patients with RA who were treated with a Janus kinase 1 (Jak1) and Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) inhibitor achieved significantly greater improvements in pain than those treated with a tumor necrosis factor blocker; both treatments resulted in similar changes in standard clinical measures and markers of inflammation. These findings suggest that Jak1 and Jak2 inhibition may relieve pain in RA caused by inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms and are consistent with the overarching involvement of the Jak-signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak/STAT) pathway in mediating the action, expression, and regulation of a multitude of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. In this review, we provide an overview of pain in RA, the underlying importance of cytokines regulated directly or indirectly by the Jak/STAT pathway, and therapeutic targeting of the Jak/STAT pathway in RA. As highlighted herein, multiple cytokines directly or indirectly regulated by the Jak/STAT pathway play important roles in mediating various mechanisms underlying pain in RA. Having a better understanding of these mechanisms may help clinicians make treatment decisions that optimize the control of inflammation and pain.

25 January 2021 in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCaroline E. Phelps
Caroline E. Phelps
ENEdita Navratilova
Edita Navratilova
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca

5 February 2020 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYanxia Chen
Yanxia Chen
AMAubin Moutal
Aubin Moutal
ENEdita Navratilova
Edita Navratilova
CKCaroline Kopruszinski
Caroline Kopruszinski
XYXu Yue
Xu Yue
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca
Female selective nociceptor sensitization and opioid-induced hyperalgesia result from an imbalance of prolactin receptor isoforms.

2 July 2020 in Cephalalgia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ENEdita Navratilova
Edita Navratilova
SBSasan Behravesh
Sasan Behravesh
JOJanice Oyarzo
Janice Oyarzo
DDDavid W Dodick
David W Dodick
PBPradeep Banerjee
Pradeep Banerjee
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca
Background: Ubrogepant, a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, was recently approved as an oral medication for the acute treatment of migraine. This study aimed to determine whether ubrogepant shows efficacy in a preclinical model of migraine-like pain and whether repeated oral administration of ubrogepant induces latent sensitization relevant to medication overuse headache in rats. Methods: A “two-hit” priming model of medication overuse headache was used. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received six oral doses of sumatriptan 10 mg/kg over 2 weeks to induce latent sensitization (i.e. “priming”). Cutaneous allodynia was measured periodically over 20 days in the periorbital and hindpaw regions using von Frey filaments. The rats were then subjected to a 1-hour bright light stress challenge on two consecutive days. At the start of the second bright light stress exposure, oral sumatriptan 10 mg/kg, oral ubrogepant 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg, or vehicle was administered; thereafter, cephalic and hindpaw sensory thresholds were monitored hourly over 5 hours to determine the efficacy of ubrogepant in reversing bright light stress-induced cutaneous allodynia. A dose of ubrogepant effective in the medication overuse headache model (100 mg/kg) was then selected to determine if repeated administration would produce latent sensitization. Rats were administered six oral doses of ubrogepant 100 mg/kg, sumatriptan 10 mg/kg (positive control), or vehicle over 2 weeks, and cutaneous allodynia was evaluated regularly. Testing continued until mechanosensitivity returned to baseline levels. Rats were then challenged with bright light stress on days 20 and 21, and periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia was measured. On days 28 to 32, the same groups received a nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside 3 mg/kg, i.p.), and cutaneous allodynia was assessed hourly over 5 hours. Results: Sumatriptan elicited cutaneous allodynia in both cephalic and hindpaw regions; cutaneous allodynia resolved to baseline levels after cessation of drug administration (14 days). Sumatriptan priming resulted in generalized and delayed cutaneous allodynia, evoked by either bright light stress (day 21) or nitric oxide donor (day 28). Ubrogepant dose-dependently blocked both stress- and nitric oxide donor-induced cephalic and hindpaw allodynia in the sumatriptan-induced medication overuse headache model with a 50% effective dose of ∼50 mg/kg. Unlike sumatriptan, ubrogepant 100 mg/kg in repeated effective doses did not produce cutaneous allodynia or latent sensitization. Conclusions: Both ubrogepant and sumatriptan demonstrated efficacy as acute medications for stress- and nitric oxide donor-evoked cephalic allodynia in a preclinical model of medication overuse headache, consistent with their clinical efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, in contrast to sumatriptan, repeated treatment with ubrogepant did not induce cutaneous allodynia or latent sensitization. These studies suggest ubrogepant may offer an effective acute treatment of migraine without risk of medication overuse headache. Trial Registration Number: Not applicable

1 February 2019 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ENEdita Navratilova
Edita Navratilova
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca

3 June 2024 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHarrison Stratton
Harrison Stratton
GLGrace Lee
Grace Lee
MDMahdi Dolatyari
Mahdi Dolatyari
AGAndre Ghetti
Andre Ghetti
TCTamara Cotta
Tamara Cotta
FPFrank Porreca
Frank Porreca
The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nociceptors. Peripheral nociceptor sensitization has been demonstrated to be clinically relevant in many pain conditions. Whether peripheral nociceptor sensitization can occur in a sexually dimorphic fashion, however, has not been extensively studied. To address this fundamental knowledge gap, we used patch clamp electrophysiology to evaluate the excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from male or female rodents, non-human primates, and humans following exposure to putative sensitizing agents. Previous studies from our laboratory, and others, have shown that prolactin promotes female-selective pain responses in rodents. Consistent with these observations, dorsal root ganglion neurons from female, but not male, mice were selectively sensitized by exposure to prolactin. The sensitizing action of prolactin was also confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons from a female macaque monkey. Critically, neurons recovered from female, but not male, human donors were also selectively sensitized by prolactin. In the course of studies of sleep and pain, we unexpectedly observed that an orexin antagonist could normalize pain responses in male animals. We found that orexin B produced sensitization of male, but not female, mouse, macaque, and human dorsal root ganglion neurons. Consistent with functional responses, increased prolactin receptor and orexin receptor 2 expression was observed in female and male mouse dorsal root ganglia, respectively. Immunohistochemical interrogation of cultured human sensory neurons and whole dorsal root ganglia also suggested increased prolactin receptor expression in females and orexin receptor 2 expression in males. These data reveal a functional double dissociation of nociceptor sensitization by sex, which is conserved across species and is likely directly relevant to human pain conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of functional sexual dimorphism in human sensory neurons. Patient sex is currently not a common consideration for the choice of pain therapy. Precision medicine, based on patient sex could improve therapeutic outcomes by selectively targeting mechanisms promoting pain in women or men. Additional implications of these findings are that the design of clinical trials for pain therapies should consider the proportions of male or female patients enrolled. Lastly, re-examination of selected past failed clinical trials with subgroup analysis by sex may be warranted.