Mark King

Dr. Mark King

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
MHMazharul Haque
Mazharul Haque
MKMark King
Mark King
SWSimon Washington
Simon Washington

1 April 2017 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
MHMazharul Haque
Mazharul Haque
MKMark King
Mark King
SWSimon Washington
Simon Washington

6 September 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OOOscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
MKMark King
Mark King
MHMazharul Haque
Mazharul Haque
SWSimon Washington
Simon Washington
Distracted driving is one of the most significant human factor issues in transport safety. Mobile phone interactions while driving may involve a multitude of cognitive and physical resources that result in inferior driving performance and reduced safety margins. The current study investigates characteristics of usage, risk factors, compensatory strategies in use and characteristics of high-frequency offenders of mobile phone use while driving. A series of questions were administered to drivers in Queensland (Australia) using an on-line questionnaire. A total of 484 drivers (34.9% males and 49.8% aged 17–25) participated anonymously. At least one of every two motorists surveyed reported engaging in distracted driving. Drivers were unable to acknowledge the increased crash risk associated with answering and locating a ringing phone in contrast to other tasks such as texting/browsing. Attitudes towards mobile phone usage were more favourable for talking than texting or browsing. Lowering the driving speed and increasing the distance from the vehicle in front were the most popular task-management strategies for talking and texting/browsing while driving. On the other hand, keeping the mobile phone low (e.g. in the driver’s lap or on the passenger seat) was the favourite strategy used by drivers to avoid police fines for both talking and texting/browsing. Logistic regression models were fitted to understand differences in risk factors for engaging in mobile phone conversations and browsing/texting while driving. For both tasks, exposure to driving, driving experience, driving history (offences and crashes), and attitudes were significant predictors. Future mobile phone prevention efforts would benefit from development of safe attitudes and increasing risk literacy. Enforcement of mobile phone distraction should be re-engineered, as the use of task-management strategies to evade police enforcement seems to dilute its effect on the prevention of this behaviour. Some countermeasures and suggestions were proposed in the design of public education campaigns and driver-mobile phone interaction.

1 May 2009 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMark King
Mark King
DSDavid Soole
David Soole
AGAmeneh Ghafourian
Ameneh Ghafourian

1 November 2009 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBridie Scott-Parker
Bridie Scott-Parker
BWBarry Watson
Barry Watson
MKMark King
Mark King

1 July 2009 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJoanne M. Wood
Joanne M. Wood
PLPhilippe F. Lacherez
Philippe F. Lacherez
RMRalph P. Marszalek
Ralph P. Marszalek
MKMark King
Mark King