Marleen van Gelder

Dr. Marleen van Gelder

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2010 in American Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
RBReini W Bretveld
Reini W Bretveld
NRNel Roeleveld
Nel Roeleveld
The traditional epidemiologic modes of data collection, including paper-and-pencil questionnaires and interviews, have several limitations, such as decreasing response rates over the last decades and high costs in large study populations. The use of Web-based questionnaires may be an attractive alternative but is still scarce in epidemiologic research because of major concerns about selective nonresponse and reliability of the data obtained. The authors discuss advantages and disadvantages of Web-based questionnaires and current developments in this area. In addition, they focus on some practical issues and safety concerns involved in the application of Web-based questionnaires in epidemiologic research. They conclude that many problems related to the use of Web-based questionnaires have been solved or will most likely be solved in the near future and that this mode of data collection offers serious benefits. However, questionnaire design issues may have a major impact on response and completion rates and on reliability of the data. Theoretically, Web-based questionnaires could be considered an alternative or complementary mode in the range of epidemiologic methods of data collection. Practice and comparisons with the traditional survey techniques should reveal whether they can fulfill their expectations.

1 November 2011 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnnemarie Boleij
Annemarie Boleij
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
DSDorine W. Swinkels
Dorine W. Swinkels
HTHarold Tjalsma
Harold Tjalsma
Background. Streptococcus bovis has long been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, not all genospecies are as closely related to CRC. With this systematic review, we aim to increase the awareness of the association between S. bovis biotype I (Streptococcus gallolyticus) and CRC and urge for uniform molecular microbiological classification. Methods. In January 2011, the PubMed database was searched for all studies that investigated the association between S. bovis, infective endocarditis (IE), and CRC. A total of 191 studies were screened for eligibility and yielded 52 case reports and 31 case series, of which 11 were used for meta-analysis on the association between S. bovis biotype, IE, and adenomas/carcinomas (CRC). Results. Among the S. bovis–infected patients who underwent colonic evaluation, the median percentage of patients who had concomitant adenomas/carcinomas was 60% (interquartile range, 22%), which largely exceeds the disease rate reported in the general asymptomatic population. Meta-analysis showed that patients with S. bovis biotype I infection had a strongly increased risk of having CRC (pooled odds ratio [OR], 7.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.94–13.36) and IE (pooled OR, 16.61; 95% CI, 8.85–31.16), compared with S. bovis biotype II–infected patients. Notably, CRC occurred more often among patients with S. bovis IE than among patients with S. bovis infection at other sites (pooled OR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.03–6.81). Conclusions. Our meta-analysis clearly indicates that S. bovis should no longer be regarded as a single species in clinical practice, because S. gallolyticus (S. bovis biotype I) infection, in particular, has an unambiguous association with CRC.

7 January 2010 in Human Reproduction Update
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
IRI. A. L. M. van Rooij
I. A. L. M. van Rooij
RMRichard K. Miller
Richard K. Miller
GZGerhard A. Zielhuis
Gerhard A. Zielhuis
LBLolkje T.W. de Jong-Van Den Berg
Lolkje T.W. de Jong-Van Den Berg
NRNel Roeleveld
Nel Roeleveld
Although prescription drug use is common during pregnancy, the human teratogenic risks are undetermined for more than 90% of drug treatments approved in the USA during the past decades. A particular birth defect may have its origins through multiple mechanisms and possible exposures, including medications. A specific pathogenic process may result in different outcomes depending upon factors such as embryonic age at which a drug is administered, duration and dose of exposure and genetic susceptibility. This review focuses on the teratogenic mechanisms associated with a number of medications. We used three methods to identify the teratogenic mechanisms of medications: the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, two recent books on teratogenic agents and a list of drugs classified as U.S. Food and Drug Administration class D or X. Mechanisms were included only if they are associated with major structural birth defects and medications that are used relatively frequently by women of reproductive age. We identified six teratogenic mechanisms associated with medication use: folate antagonism, neural crest cell disruption, endocrine disruption, oxidative stress, vascular disruption and specific receptor- or enzyme-mediated teratogenesis. Many medications classified as class X are associated with at least one of these mechanisms. Identifying teratogenic mechanisms may not only be relevant for etiologic and post-marketing research, but may also have implications for drug development and prescribing behavior for women of reproductive age, especially since combinations of seemingly unrelated prescription and over the counter medications may utilize similar teratogenic mechanisms with a resultant increased risk of birth defects.

5 November 2015 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKim F.E. van de Loo
Kim F.E. van de Loo
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
JRJolt Roukema
Jolt Roukema
NRNel Roeleveld
Nel Roeleveld
PMPeter J.F.M. Merkus
Peter J.F.M. Merkus
CVChristianne M. Verhaak
Christianne M. Verhaak
The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies on prenatal maternal psychological stress and the subsequent development of asthma and wheezing in early childhood.All available published literature from 1960 until November 2013 was systematically searched through electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and Web of Science). All observational studies assessing associations between any form of prenatal maternal psychological stress and respiratory morbidity in the child were included. Data extraction, quality assessment and meta-analyses were performed.The overall meta-analysis included 10 studies and showed that the prevalence of wheezing, asthma and other respiratory symptoms is higher in children of mothers who were exposed to or experienced some form of psychological stress during pregnancy than in mothers who did not (pooled OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.36–1.80)). Comparable results were observed in subgroup analyses of stress exposure, perceived stress, asthma and wheezing.This study demonstrates that prenatal maternal psychological stress is associated with respiratory morbidity, including asthma and wheezing in the child. Future studies examining the early origins of asthma and wheezing need to account for the impact of prenatal maternal stress.

1 June 2010 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
JRJennita Reefhuis
Jennita Reefhuis
ACAlissa R. Caton
Alissa R. Caton
MWMartha M Werler
Martha M Werler
CDCharlotte M. Druschel
Charlotte M. Druschel
NRNel Roeleveld
Nel Roeleveld
According to the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 4.6% of American women reported use of an illicit drug during pregnancy. Previous studies on illicit drug use during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes showed inconsistent results. This population-based study included mothers who delivered live-born infants without birth defects between 1997 and 2004 and completed interviews for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (response rate 69%; n=5871). Prevalence of self-reported illicit drug use (specifically cannabis, cocaine, and stimulants) during pregnancy and its associations with demographic and social factors were assessed. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses to study the associations of cannabis use with birth weight and gestational age. The prevalence of reported illicit drug use during pregnancy was 3.6% (standard error 0.24). Pregnant users of cannabis, cocaine, and stimulants were younger, had a lower level of education and lower household income, and were less likely to have used folic acid in the periconceptional period than nonusers. Illicit drug users were also more likely to have used alcohol and tobacco. After adjustment for confounding, cannabis use was not associated with mean birth weight or gestational age or with low birth weight or preterm delivery. Women who report use of illicit drugs during pregnancy differ in demographic and socioeconomic background from nonusers. Reported cannabis use does not seem to be associated with low birth weight or preterm birth.

1 April 2012 in Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HNHedvig Nordeng
Hedvig Nordeng
MGMarleen van Gelder
Marleen van Gelder
OSOlav Spigset
Olav Spigset
GKGideon Koren
Gideon Koren
AEAdrienne Einarson
Adrienne Einarson
MEMalin Eberhard-Gran
Malin Eberhard-Gran
Results of previous studies on the safety of antidepressants during pregnancy have been conflicting. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether first-trimester exposure to antidepressants, specifically selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), was associated with increased risk of congenital malformations. The secondary objective was to examine the effects of exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy on birth weight and gestational age. We included 63,395 women from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. The women had completed 2 self-administered questionnaires at gestational weeks 17 and 30 on medication use and medical, sociodemographic, and psychological factors. Data on pregnancy outcome were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Of the 63,395 women, 699 (1.1%) reported using antidepressants during pregnancy, most frequently SSRIs (0.9%). Exposure to SSRIs during the first trimester was not associated with increased risk of congenital malformations in general (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–1.84) or cardiovascular malformations (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.67–3.43). Exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.87–1.69) or low birth weight (adjusted OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.33–1.16). This study does not suggest a strongly increased risk of malformations, preterm birth, or low birth weight following prenatal exposure to antidepressants. Without adjustments for level of maternal depression and various sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, antidepressant use during pregnancy would wrongly have been associated with an increased risk of preterm birth.