Curvature sensors are used to measure wave-front aberrations in a number of different applications ranging from adaptive optics to optical testing. In practice, their performance is limited not only by the quality of the detector used for irradiance measurements but also by the separation between measurement planes used for the calculation of the axial derivative of intensity. This work resolves the problem of determining the separation between intensity measurement planes thus optimizing the variance in experimental measurements. To do this, the variance of the local curvature of the phase will be analyzed as a function of the noise level in the measurements and the separation between planes. Moreover, error bounds will be established for experimental measurements.

Optics InfoBase is the Optical Society's online library for flagship journals, partnered and copublished journals, and recent proceedings from OSA conferences.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual quality when changing the intraocular orientation of the Lentis Mplus LS-312MF nonrotational symmetric +3.00 diopters aspheric multifocal intraocular lens ([IOL] Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in normal eyes. METHODS: An artificial eye was used to measure the in vitro wavefront of the IOL. The corneal topography of 20 healthy patients was obtained. For each eye, a computational analysis simulated the implantation of the IOL. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and an image quality parameter (visually modulated transfer function [VSMTF] metric) were calculated for a 5.0-mm pupil and for three conditions: distance, intermediate, and near vision. The procedure was repeated for each eye after a rotation of the IOL with respect to the cornea from 0° to 360° in 1° steps. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed significant differences in mean VSMTF values between orientations for distance vision. Optimal orientation of the IOL (different for each eye) showed a mean improvement of 58% ± 19% (range: 20% to 121%) in VSMTF values with respect to the worst possible orientation. For these orientations, intermediate and near vision quality were statistically indistinguishable. The MTFs were different between orientations, showing a mean difference of approximately 5 cycles per degree in the maximum spatial frequencies that can be transferred between the best and the worst orientations for distance vision. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that implantation of this nonrotational symmetric IOL should improve visual outcomes if it is oriented to coincide with a customized meridian. A simple, practical method is proposed to find an approximation to the angle that an Mplus IOL should be inserted. [ J Refract Surg. 2015;31(10):651–656.]

An intensity enhancement of the green upconversion emission from a codoped Er³⁺ -Yb³⁺ fluoroindate glass has been obtained by coating the glass surface with silica microspheres (3.8 µm diameter). The microspheres focus an incoming beam (λ ≈950 nm) on the surface of the fluoroindate glass. The green emission (λ ≈545 nm) of the Er³⁺ ions located in the microsphere focus was measured with a microscope in reflection mode, being the peak intensity 4.5 times the emission of the bare substrate. The transversal FWHM of the upconversion spot was experimentally determined by deconvolution with the experimental Point Spread Function of the system, obtaining a value of 309 nm. This value is in good agreement with Finite-Difference Time-Domain simulations taking into account the magnification of the image due to the microsphere.

A conventional Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor works with an array of lenslets which produces an array of focal spots in the back focal plane of the lenses. The displacements of the focal spots from a reference position give a measure of the mean local wavefront slopes. To determine the positions of the focal spots, centroiding algorithms have to be used. In this work, the use of superresolution pupil filters to reduce the size of the focal spots is analyzed, as well as its effect on the variance of the centroid estimate, seeking for an enhancing of the sensor accuracy.