GAEUN LEE

Mrs. GAEUN LEE

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJooae Choe
Jooae Choe
SLSang Min Lee
Sang Min Lee
KDKyung-Hyun Do
Kyung-Hyun Do
GLGAEUN LEE
GAEUN LEE
JLJune-Goo Lee
June-Goo Lee
JSJoon Beom Seo
Joon Beom Seo
CT image conversion using a convolutional neural network can reduce the effect of different reconstruction kernels on radiomic parameters. This will facilitate comparison of image features derived ... Background Intratumor heterogeneity in lung cancer may influence outcomes. CT radiomics seeks to assess tumor features to provide detailed imaging features. However, CT radiomic features vary accor...

1 January 2020 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHyun Jung Koo
Hyun Jung Koo
JLJune-Goo Lee
June-Goo Lee
JKJi Yeon Ko
Ji Yeon Ko
GLGAEUN LEE
GAEUN LEE
JKJoon-Won Kang
Joon-Won Kang
DYDong Hyun Yang
Dong Hyun Yang
Koo HJ, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2020 Feb;21:e64. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0378

1 January 2024 in Korean Circulation Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GJGyu-Jun Jeong
Gyu-Jun Jeong
GLGAEUN LEE
GAEUN LEE
JLJune-Goo Lee
June-Goo Lee
SKSoo-Jin Kang
Soo-Jin Kang
Jeong GJ, et al. Korean Circ J. 2024 Jan;54(1):30-39. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2023.0166

11 May 2024 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSung Huyn Noh
Sung Huyn Noh
GLGAEUN LEE
GAEUN LEE
HBHyun-Jin Bae
Hyun-Jin Bae
JHJu Yeon Han
Ju Yeon Han
SSSu Jeong Son
Su Jeong Son
YHYoon Ha
Yoon Ha
This study measured parameters automatically by marking the point for measuring each parameter on whole-spine radiographs. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1017 sequential lateral whole-spine radiographs were retrospectively obtained. Of these, 819 and 198 were used for training and testing the performance of the landmark detection model, respectively. To objectively evaluate the program’s performance, 690 whole-spine radiographs from four other institutions were used for external validation. The combined dataset comprised radiographs from 857 female and 850 male patients (average age 42.2 ± 27.3 years; range 20–85 years). The landmark localizer showed the highest accuracy in identifying cervical landmarks (median error 1.5–2.4 mm), followed by lumbosacral landmarks (median error 2.1–3.0 mm). However, thoracic landmarks displayed larger localization errors (median 2.4–4.3 mm), indicating slightly reduced precision compared with the cervical and lumbosacral regions. The agreement between the deep learning model and two experts was good to excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient values >0.88. The deep learning model also performed well on the external validation set. There were no statistical differences between datasets in all parameters, suggesting that the performance of the artificial intelligence model created was excellent. The proposed automatic alignment analysis system identified anatomical landmarks and positions of the spine with high precision and generated various radiograph imaging parameters that had a good correlation with manual measurements.