Purpose: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of HER2 expression could potentially be used to select patients for HER2-targed therapy, predict response based on uptake and be used for monitoring. In this phase I/II study the HER2-binding Affibody molecule ABY-025 was labeled with ⁶⁸Ga-gallium ([⁶⁸Ga]ABY-025) for PET to study effect of peptide mass, test-retest variability and correlation of quantified uptake in tumors to histopathology.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a major prognostic and predictive marker overexpressed in 15–20% of breast cancers. The diagnostic reference standard for selecting patients for HER2-targeted therapy is based on the analysis of tumor biopsies. Previously patients were defined as HER2-positive or -negative; however, with the approval of novel treatment options, specifically the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan, many breast cancer patients with tumors expressing low levels of HER2 have become eligible for HER2-targeted therapy. Such patients will need to be reliably identified by suitable diagnostic methods. Biopsy-based diagnostics are invasive, and repeat biopsies are not always feasible. They cannot visualize the heterogeneity of HER2 expression, leading to a substantial number of misdiagnosed patients. An alternative and highly accurate diagnostic method is molecular imaging with radiotracers. In the case of HER2, various studies demonstrate the clinical utility and feasibility of such approaches. Radiotracers based on Affibody^® molecules, small, engineered affinity proteins with a size of ~6.5 kDa, are clinically validated molecules with favorable characteristics for imaging. In this article, we summarize the HER2-targeted therapeutic landscape, describe our experience with imaging diagnostics for HER2, and review the currently available clinical data on HER2-Affibody-based molecular imaging as a novel diagnostic tool in breast cancer and beyond.

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa) and in hormone-driven breast cancer (BCa). The aim of this phase I clinical trial was to evaluate safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry after the administration of the recently developed GRPR-targeting antagonistic bombesin analogue [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 in PCa and BCa patients. Planar and whole-body SPECT/CT imaging was performed in six PCa patients and seven BCa patients 2, 4, 6, and 24 h post the intravenous administration of 40 µg of [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 (600–700 MBq). No adverse events or pathological changes were observed. The rapid blood clearance of [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 was observed with predominantly hepatobiliary excretion. The effective doses were 0.0053 ± 0.0007 for male patients and 0.008 ± 0.003 mSv/MBq for female patients. The accumulation of [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 in tumors was observed in four out of six PCa and in seven out of seven BCa patients. In four BCa patients, a high uptake of the agent into the axillary lymph nodes was detected. Immunohistochemistry revealed positive GRPR expression in 60% of primary PCa, 71.4% of BCa tumors, and 50% of examined BCa lymph nodes. In conclusion, a single administration of [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 was safe and well tolerated. [^99mTc]Tc-maSSS-PEG₂-RM26 SPECT may be useful for tumor detection in PCa and BCa patients, pending further studies.

Myocardial external efficiency (MEE) is defined as the ratio of kinetic energy associated with cardiac work [forward cardiac output (FCO)*mean systemic pressure] and the chemical energy from oxygen consumed (MVO₂) by the left ventricular mass (LVM). We developed a fully automated method for estimating MEE based on a single ¹¹C-acetate PET scan without ECG-gating.

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an automated method for extracting forward stroke volume (FSV) using indicator dilution theory directly from dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) studies for two different tracers and scanners. 35 subjects underwent a dynamic 11C-acetate PET scan on a Siemens Biograph TruePoint-64 PET/CT (scanner I). In addition, 10 subjects underwent both dynamic 15O-water PET and 11C-acetate PET scans on a GE Discovery-ST PET/CT (scanner II). The left ventricular (LV)-aortic time-activity curve (TAC) was extracted automatically from PET data using cluster analysis. The first-pass peak was isolated by automatic extrapolation of the downslope of the TAC. FSV was calculated as the injected dose divided by the product of heart rate and the area under the curve of the first-pass peak. Gold standard FSV was measured using phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). FSVPET correlated highly with FSVCMR (r = 0.87, slope = 0.90 for scanner I, r = 0.87, slope = 1.65, and r = 0.85, slope = 1.69 for scanner II for 15O-water and 11C-acetate, respectively) although a systematic bias was observed for both scanners (p < 0.001 for all). FSV based on 11C-acetate and 15O-water correlated highly (r = 0.99, slope = 1.03) with no significant difference between FSV estimates (p = 0.14). FSV can be obtained automatically using dynamic PET/CT and cluster analysis. Results are almost identical for 11C-acetate and 15O-water. A scanner-dependent bias was observed, and a scanner calibration factor is required for multi-scanner studies. Generalization of the method to other tracers and scanners requires further validation.

High interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) in colorectal cancer metastases may decrease the uptake and, thus, the effects of antitumor drugs. Imatinib, a selective inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, respectively, increase drug uptake or decrease IFP in preclinical models of carcinoma. Drug-induced decrease in IFP in human metastases has not been objectively shown but should be reflected by an increase in water-perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) or tumor blood flow (TBF) using ¹⁵O-water PET/CT and kinetic modeling. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of imatinib and anakinra on PTF and TBF in colorectal cancer metastases in patients. Methods: Nine patients with documented progressive disease despite all established therapy underwent ¹⁵O-water PET/CT at baseline and at 2 d and 6–7 d after the start of oral administration of imatinib (400 mg/d). After a washout period of 1 wk, the protocol was repeated with anakinra (100 mg/d) subcutaneously. Six patients underwent a second baseline scan on the same day to assess reproducibility of PTF and TBF measurements. Volumes of interest were drawn over liver metastases and aorta. PTF and TBF were calculated using the standard single-tissue-compartment model. Results: Imatinib administration during 6–7 d increased PTF from 0.62 ± 0.12 to 0.69 ± 0.13, compared with baseline and day 2 (P = 0.02, Wilcoxon test). No significant changes were found in TBF. PTF values were no longer significantly different from baseline 1 wk after the last imatinib dosage. Anakinra induced no significant change in PTF or TBF. The repeatability coefficients of PTF and TBF in liver lesions were 22% and 28%, respectively. Conclusion: Imatinib increases PTF of colorectal cancer metastases in patients and hence may increase the delivery of antitumor drugs. ¹⁵O-water PET/CT and kinetic modeling provide insights into the microenvironment of human cancers.