Previous studies have indicated that trunk muscle strength decreases with chronic low back pain, and is associated with poor balance, poor functional performance, and falls in older adults. Strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain are considered the most effective intervention to improve functional outcomes. We developed an innovative exercise device for abdominal trunk muscles that also measures muscle strength. The correlation between muscle weakness, as measured by our device, the presence of chronic low back pain, and decreased physical ability associated with a risk of falling were evaluated in older women. Thirty-eight elderly women, who could walk without support during daily activities and attended our outpatient clinic for treatment of chronic low back pain, knee or hip arthritis, or osteoporosis, were included in this study. Anthropometric measurements were performed. Grip power and one-leg standing time with eyes open were measured, and abdominal trunk muscle strength was measured using our device. History of falling in the previous 12 months was noted. Subjects with chronic low back pain (visual analog scale score ≥ 20 mm) for over 3 months were assigned to the low back pain group (n = 21). The remaining subjects formed the non-low back pain group (n = 17). Abdominal muscle strength of subjects in the low back pain group, and with history of falling, was significantly lower compared with that of subjects in the non-low back pain group, and in subjects without a history of falling, respectively. There was a moderate positive correlation between abdominal trunk muscle strength and one-leg standing time with eyes open. We measured abdominal muscle strength in older women with chronic low back pain using our device, and it was significantly lower than that of those without chronic low back pain. Muscle weakness was associated with a history and risk of falling.

Object: The prognosis in patients with a distant spinal metastasis from the lung is dismal. The role of radical surgery in such cases has been questioned because of the excessive morbidity, blood loss, and operative time as well as the tumor's extreme malignancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical results and the prognosis associated with radical surgery for lung cancer metastasis to the spine in carefully selected patients and to clarify whether there is an indication for radical surgery such as total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in lung cancer metastasis. Methods: The author performed a retrospective review of patients with lung cancer spinal metastasis treated by TES during a 10-year period. Total en bloc spondylectomy for lung cancer metastasis to the spine was performed in 6 patients without visceral or other bony metastases. Outcome measures were prognostic score, mean survival time, and perioperative complications. The histological type was adenocarcinoma in all 6 cases. In 4 cases the surgical strategy prognostic score was 5. In the other 2 cases the score was 6 because there were skip metastases to adjacent vertebra. In the 2 cases with adjacent vertebral metastasis, the adjacent vertebra was excised en bloc together. Results: The mean estimated blood loss was 1076 ml and the mean operative time was 7 hours 20 minutes. Perioperative complications were found in 2 cases. One was deep infection after CSF leakage, and the other was paralysis due to postoperative hematoma. At the end of follow-up period, 4 of 6 patients are still living after a mean of 46.3 months (range 36–62 months). In the other 2 cases, 1 patient died of a heart attack and the other of mediastinitis due to surgical site infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In this series, local recurrence was not found. Conclusions: Total en bloc spondylectomy has been shown to be associated with excessive morbidity, blood loss, and operative time; however, the procedure is becoming less invasive. The authors conclude that TES is appropriate in selected cases with controllable primary lung cancer, localized spinal metastasis, and no visceral metastasis. In such patients, improvement in the prognosis can be expected after TES. However, even in selected cases and with skilled surgical technique, the complication rate remains high. Total en bloc spondylectomy should be performed after a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits.

A retrospective review of patients with interruption of the artery of Adamkiewicz during total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). To assess neurologic function after interruption of the artery of Adamkiewicz in TES. The most important feeding artery of the thoracolumbar spinal cord is the great anterior radiculomedullary artery, also called the artery of Adamkiewicz. The artery of Adamkiewicz supplies the lower two-thirds of the spinal cord via the anterior spinal artery. It is naturally believed among spine surgeons that interruption of the artery of Adamkiewicz during surgeries is absolutely contraindicated. However, it is necessary to sacrifice the artery of Adamkiewicz during TES, when the tumor, by chance, exists at the level of the artery of Adamkiewicz. Between 1990 and 2009, we have performed 180 cases of TES. All cases except for few emergency cases received preoperative embolization. The artery of Adamkiewicz was verified by angiography of the segmental arteries. There were 15 patients in which the artery of Adamkiewicz was found at the levels of resected vertebrae. Interruption of the artery was performed during surgery in these 15 cases. Neurologic function was analyzed retrospectively. Of the 15 patients, the Frankel grade before surgery was C in 1, D in 5, and E in 9. At follow-up, the Frankel grade was D in 1 and E in 14. There were no cases of neurologic deterioration or paralysis after TES. On the basis of our results of TES on up to 3 vertebrae, interruption of the artery of Adamkiewicz for TES does not adversely affect neurologic function. We advocate strongly that our surgeons are allowed to sacrifice up to 3 pairs of segmental arteries, even including the artery of Adamkiewicz, if necessary.

This was a retrospective clinical study. This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience with total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in patients treated for primary lumbar spine tumors and investigate postoperative clinical outcomes. TES is a widely accepted by spinal and musculoskeletal surgical oncologists and results in favorable health-related quality of life outcomes. However, this procedure still imposes major risks and complications. The cases of TES performed for primary lumbar spine tumors between 1993 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome measures were the rates of perioperative complications and reoperation for instrumentation failure. We enrolled 30 patients (13 men and 17 women; median age and follow-up, 38 years and 87 months, respectively). Three, 7, and 5 cases involved previous radiotherapy, intralesional resection, and chemotherapy, respectively. The most common tumor was giant cell tumor (14 cases) followed by osteosarcoma (4 cases) and plasmacytoma (3 cases). The median estimated blood loss was 1450 mL, and the median operative time was 11 hours. At least 1 perioperative complication occurred in 26 patients (86.7%), with the most common being postoperative muscle weakness (24 patients, 80.0%) followed by surgical site infection and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (7 patients, respectively; 23.3% each). Revision surgery for instrumentation failure was required in 6 patients (20.0%) at a median of 33 months after the index TES. Four patients experienced local tumor recurrence (13.3%), and their 10-year disease-free rate was 75.0%. TES is a feasible and effective procedure for primary lumbar spine tumors, but the risks of perioperative complications and late instrumentation failure should be acknowledged. Surgical oncologic outcomes were good, especially in patients who underwent TES as their first surgical treatment. Therefore, being familiar with the indications for TES and the surgical technique is important.

Two case reports of telangiectatic osteosarcoma treated with complete segmental resection of the spine, including the spinal cord. To report the en bloc tumor excision, including the spinal cord, for telangiectatic osteosarcoma, and discuss the indication of cord transection and influence after cutting the spinal cord. To our knowledge, there are no previous reports describing telangiectatic osteosarcoma of the spine and the subsequent en bloc excision of the spine, including the spinal cord. The clinical and radiographic presentations of 2 cases with telangiectatic osteosarcoma are presented. Because these 2 cases already had complete paralysis for at least 1 month, it was suspected that there was no possibility of recovering spinal cord function. Complete segmental spinal resection (total en bloc spondylectomy) was performed. At that level, the spinal cord was also cut and resected. En bloc excision of the tumor with a wide margin was achieved in both cases. In the resected specimen, the nerve cells in the spinal cord had lapsed into degenerative necrosis. The pathologic findings showed that there was no hope for recovery of spinal cord function. En bloc spinal resection, including the spinal cord, is an operation allowed when there is no hope for recovery of spinal cord function. This surgery should be accepted as an option in spine tumor surgeries.

Object: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for thoracic spinal tumors may in theory produce neurological dysfunction as a result of ischemic or mechanical damage to the spinal cord. Potential insults include preoperative embolization at 3 levels, intraoperative ligation of segmental arteries, nerve root ligation, and circumferential dural dissection. The purpose of this study was to assess neurological function after thoracic TES. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 79 patients with thoracic-level spinal tumors that had been treated with TES between 1989 and 2006. Neurological function was retrospectively analyzed according to the Frankel grading system. Of the 79 cases, 26 involved primary tumors and 53 involved metastatic tumors. The number of excised vertebrae was 1 in 60 cases, 2 in 13, and ≥ 3 in 6. The Frankel grade before surgery was B in 1 case, C in 16, D in 29, and E in 33. Results: At the follow-up, the Frankel grade was C in 2 cases, D in 24, and E in 53. Of 46 cases with neurological deficits before surgery, neurological improvement of at least 1 Frankel grade was achieved in 25 cases (54.3%). Although the Frankel grade did not change in 21 patients, improvement in neurological symptoms within the same Frankel grade did occur in these patients. There were no cases of neurological deterioration. Conclusions: There was no neurological deterioration due to preoperative embolization, ligation of segmental arteries, or ligation of thoracic nerve roots. Each of the cases with preoperative neurological deficits showed improvement in neurological symptoms. Data in the current study clinically proved that TES is a safe operation with respect to spinal cord blood flow. In TES, the spinal cord is circumferentially decompressed and the spinal column is shortened. An increase in spinal cord blood flow due to spinal shortening in addition to decompression was considered to have brought about a resolution of neurological symptoms with TES.