MYRTO ASTRITI

Dr. MYRTO ASTRITI


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2024 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChristos Thomadakis
Christos Thomadakis
DBDimitrios G Basoulis
Dimitrios G Basoulis
Olga TsachouridouOlga Tsachouridou
Olga Tsachouridou
Konstantinos ProtopapasKonstantinos Protopapas
Konstantinos Protopapas
VPVassilios A. Paparizos
Vassilios A. Paparizos
GTGiota Touloumi
Giota Touloumi
People living with HIV-HCV co-infection comprise a target group for HCV-micro-elimination. We conducted an HCV cascade of care (CoC) for HIV-HCV co-infected individuals living in Greece and investigated factors associated with different HCV-CoC stages. We analyzed data from 1213 participants from the Athens Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. A seven-stage CoC, overall and by subgroup (people who inject drugs (PWID), men having sex with men (MSM), men having sex with women (MSW), and migrants], was constructed, spanning from HCV diagnosis to sustained virologic response (SVR). Logistic/Cox regression models were employed to identify factors associated with passing through each CoC step. Among 1213 anti-HCV-positive individuals, 9.2% died before direct-acting antiviral (DAA) availability. PWID exhibited higher mortality rates than MSM. Of 1101 survivors, 72.2% remained in care and underwent HCV-RNA testing. Migrants and PWID showed the lowest retention rates. HCV-RNA was available for 79.2% of those in care, with 77.8% diagnosed with chronic HCV. Subsequently, 71% initiated DAAs, with individuals with very low CD4 counts (<100 cells/μL) exhibiting lower odds of DAA initiation. SVR testing was available for 203 individuals, with 85.7% achieving SVR. The SVR rates did not differ across risk groups. In 2023, significant gaps and between-group differences persisted in HCV-CoC among HIV-HCV co-infected individuals in Greece.

5 August 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAntonios Papadopoulos
Antonios Papadopoulos
MAMYRTO ASTRITI
MYRTO ASTRITI
VPVasileios Papastamopoulos
Vasileios Papastamopoulos
VPVassilios A. Paparizos
Vassilios A. Paparizos
HSHelen G Sambatakou
Helen G Sambatakou
LPLazaros Poughias
Lazaros Poughias
Background: Doravirine (DOR) is a new-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which has emerged as an option for people living with HIV (PLWH) owing to its favorable efficacy and safety profile, unique resistance pathway and limited potential for drug-drug interactions. Methods: This retrospective chart review study aimed to better understand DOR-based treatment use in Greece, PLWH characteristics, and drivers of treatment switch. Eligible individuals were adult PLWH who were switched to a DOR-based regimen based on the physician’s decision. Individuals exposed to DOR at any time prior to switching to the DOR-based regimen were excluded. Results: From 12 July 2023 to 31 October 2023, 110 PLWH were consecutively enrolled across 6 public hospital clinics. At baseline (closest prior to or on the date of first DOR prescription), the mean age of PLWH was 49.3 years, 90.9% were males, 88.2% were asymptomatic, 86.5% were virologically suppressed, 33.6% were suffering from multimorbidity (excluding infections/infestations), 45.5% were receiving comedications for their comorbidities, and 5.5% were co-infected with Hepatitis C virus. Most PLWH (98.2%) were prescribed DOR plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; 87.3% were prescribed DOR/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate fixed-dose combination. PLWH started DOR a median of 11.7 years after first-ever antiretroviral therapy initiation, corresponding to 2nd/3rd/≥4th antiretroviral line in 33.6%/33.6%/32.7% of participants, respectively; 60.9% of them were proactively switched to a DOR-based regimen. The most common reasons for switching were ‘regimen simplification’ (42.7%), ‘tolerability’ (26.4%) and ‘prevention of toxicities’ (18.2%). Conclusions: This study highlights the patterns of DOR use in real-life clinical practice in Greece among treatment-experienced PLWH. Physicians switch HIV-1-infected individuals from prior ART to DOR-based regimens to offer a simplified regimen or to avoid or prevent toxicity.